ronan posted:

there is a special carve-out in the Guyana Constitution - Article 106 - dealing with the 'overthrow' of a legally elected Government by NCV for a reason

it is grave business

i again offer the USA comparison which, while inexact, provides a kind of clarity the scampish, hurry-up-before-they-ketch-on, GT media assets of Jagdeo husslin to avoid at ALL COSTS:

- what if Charandaas Persaud was a (Canadian) dual-citizen US Senator illegally occupying that seat who cast the deciding vote to impeach a hypothetical sitting US president?

then promptly requests Canadian Consular assistance as he rushes to the airport, leaves the country using his Canadian passport, and hunkers down in Toronto telling all who would listen "so what if i was bribed?"

how do y'all think the Supreme Court would rule?

how do y'all think the court of public opinion would rule?

how would a free, independent media treat this? -

 

 

 

A 23-year-old woman was Wednesday committed to stand trial at the High Court for stabbing her husband to death in 2017.

Lisa Keisha Halley, of Lot 55 David Street, Kitty was committed by Magistrate Leron Daly for the indictable manslaughter charge which alleged that on July 29, 2017, at Lot 30 Queen Street, Kitty, she unlawfully killed Dailson Halley.

She was released on $250,000 bail pending her hearing at the High Court.

According to reports, the couple shared a relationship and have two kids together during which Halley allegedly suffered abuse at the hands of her husband.

 

It is alleged that on the day in question, the two had an argument when the man armed him himself with a knife and threatened to kill her.

Halley reportedly retaliated, disarmed her husband and stabbed him.

The injured man was taken to the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation (GPHC) where he succumbed to his injuries.

oh ress yuh razz. get a better life than chasing after east indians.

seignet posted:

oh ress yuh razz. get a better life than chasing after east indians.

He is the Guyana black man noise machine on GNI.

ronan posted:

there is a special carve-out in the Guyana Constitution - Article 106 - dealing with the 'overthrow' of a legally elected Government by NCV for a reason

it is grave business

i again offer the USA comparison which, while inexact, provides a kind of clarity the scampish, hurry-up-before-they-ketch-on, GT media assets of Jagdeo husslin to avoid at ALL COSTS:

- what if Charandaas Persaud was a (Canadian) dual-citizen US Senator illegally occupying that seat who cast the deciding vote to impeach a hypothetical sitting US president?

then promptly requests Canadian Consular assistance as he rushes to the airport, leaves the country using his Canadian passport, and hunkers down in Toronto telling all who would listen "so what if i was bribed?"

how do y'all think the Supreme Court would rule?

how do y'all think the court of public opinion would rule?

how would a free, independent media treat this? -

@Former Member

Quite an impressive rebuttals on this thread.

Django posted:

@Former Member

Quite an impressive rebuttals on this thread.

Rass, like you wake up late bhai?

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

@Former Member

Quite an impressive rebuttals on this thread.

Rass, like you wake up late bhai?

Up a long while bhai, noticeably when there are no answers, thread are derailed.

Today is the deadline for all sides in the trials before Chief Justice (acting) Roxane George to present their arguments. Hopefully we will get more information on the LEGAL submissions as so far it has only been political posturing. Hopefully we will get the information that Norton told the media the PNC had regarding bribery to Charrandas. Based on the posturing of the AFC members regarding their other dual citizenship MPs, it seems that they are only arguing that Charrandas' votes is invalid because of his treacherous actions via taking a bribe to vote against his party. This will place that accusation of bribery front and center in this case and Norton and the others who have information will have to present them. The light is about to be switched on.

Django posted:

@Former Member

Quite an impressive rebuttals on this thread.

How many times yo gotta daal. 

APNU - AFC is DEAD MEAT - ayo get use to it 

we the Guyanese citizen  will nail the final nail in a few months.. brace yo self for the explosive news in a few days 

Dave posted:

Django posted:

@Former Member

Quite an impressive rebuttals on this thread.

How many times yo gotta daal. 

APNU - AFC is DEAD MEAT - ayo get use to it 

we the Guyanese citizen  will nail the final nail in a few months.. brace yo self for the explosive news in a few days 

Sorry bhai, you may got another rude awakening like 2015, don't forget it's only 3+ yrs since the last  R+G Elections.

Django posted:

Dave posted:

Django posted:

@Former Member

Quite an impressive rebuttals on this thread.

How many times yo gotta daal. 

APNU - AFC is DEAD MEAT - ayo get use to it 

we the Guyanese citizen  will nail the final nail in a few months.. brace yo self for the explosive news in a few days 

Sorry bhai, you may got another rude awakening like 2015.

Those words sound familiar from u 

- Local Government Election.

- No confidence Motion. 

HAHAHA  BRAY DONKEY BRAY DONKEY BRAY. GUYANA IS NOT AFRICA OR LATIN AMERICA, OVERTHROW MY ASS!!  STUPID AS STUPID GETS!!

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Dave posted:

Django posted:

@Former Member

Quite an impressive rebuttals on this thread.

How many times yo gotta daal. 

APNU - AFC is DEAD MEAT - ayo get use to it 

we the Guyanese citizen  will nail the final nail in a few months.. brace yo self for the explosive news in a few days 

Sorry bhai, you may got another rude awakening like 2015.

Those words sound familiar from u 

- Local Government Election.

- No confidence Motion. 

 

The last LGE  and few other frivolous claims isn't the will of the Nation for the recent NCM tabled by BJ.

This sis evidence of the depth of ILLITERACY, IGNORANCE and plain STUPIDITY of the FILTH HEADS!!!

ronan posted:

there is a special carve-out in the Guyana Constitution - Article 106 - dealing with the 'overthrow' of a legally elected Government by NCV for a reason

it is grave business

i again offer the USA comparison which, while inexact, provides a kind of clarity the scampish, hurry-up-before-they-ketch-on, GT media assets of Jagdeo husslin to avoid at ALL COSTS:

- what if Charandaas Persaud was a (Canadian) dual-citizen US Senator illegally occupying that seat who cast the deciding vote to impeach a hypothetical sitting US president?

then promptly requests Canadian Consular assistance as he rushes to the airport, leaves the country using his Canadian passport, and hunkers down in Toronto telling all who would listen "so what if i was bribed?"

how do y'all think the Supreme Court would rule?

how do y'all think the court of public opinion would rule?

how would a free, independent media treat this? -

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

Billy, it is the SHIT in his head, not his fault

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

Rupert Roopnarine confessed that he has been a naturalized UK citizens for over a decade. Overnight Yankees, Englishmen, and Canadians.  You all find out if Dave Martins holds citizenship for Canada.  

Time for another tune. 

Billy, are you a Surgeon?  Cause dem need to get the SHIT out of their heads

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

His vote was valid when passing budgets and legislations.  Why suddenly his vote is invalid?

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

His vote was valid when passing budgets and legislations.  Why suddenly his vote is invalid?

The Judge will decide. There are some grey areas with his NCV.

Nehru posted:

Billy, are you a Surgeon?  Cause dem need to get the SHIT out of their heads

Django is an independent thinker who has no affiliation with any party. He is non-aligned when it comes to the PPP and PNC.   

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

His vote was valid when passing budgets and legislations.  Why suddenly his vote is invalid?

The Judge will decide. There are some grey areas with his NCV.

You can’t have it both ways. 

you claimed the judge will decide then follow up with “ some grey areas with the NCM” 

WTF. 

@ Django.

Do you agree all of Charandass  vote prior to the NCV are valid in the National Assembly. 

Please provide a honest straight forward answer. 

Yes or No. to my question.

What a waste of space by an uneducated jackass, writing such a post that does not make sense. 

Charrandas was ELECTED by the people{regrettably} and he is their representative in parliament. Ministers of the government are selected by the President. So what actions Charrandas took, that's on behalf of the people he represents. A simple example in the UK, many of May's party supporters voted against her that made the Brexit vote failed, she passed the no confidence vote but eventually she may have to resign. 

 Let's get to the main issue, the fight is not to lose power at all cost, because the g lottery pay off is coming, OIL Revenue in one year time.

Politics is a game of chest, who can topple the king, and capture the pawns.Jagdeo played well and won for the PPP, now the PNC wants a replay, too late, game over!!!

KP, some people are dedicated to their Masters all the way to their grave. We can witness that in many parts of the world!!

I would have been personally embarrassed if the PPP had been behaving in such a pathetic manner. These PNC politicians can't even act like they have been there done that before. They look like Trump with all his buffoonery amongst other less than impressive actions.

Waiting for their next silly straw clutching action. 

Kasz, dont insult the FOOL Trump  Those SHIT HEADS dont know their mouths from their asses.

Dave posted:

@ Django.

Do you agree all of Charandass  vote prior to the NCV are valid in the National Assembly. 

Please provide a honest straight forward answer. 

Yes or No. to my question.

What makes you think it's that simple ? any way that's not a huge red herring.

Dave posted:

@ Django.

Do you agree all of Charandass  vote prior to the NCV are valid in the National Assembly. 

Please provide a honest straight forward answer. 

Yes or No. to my question.

That's a hard one, wait for awhile, answers are being emailed from Guyana. You don't want the man to implicate himself, then he will be fired.

kp posted:

Politics is a game of chest, who can topple the king, and capture the pawns.Jagdeo played well and won for the PPP, now the PNC wants a replay, too late, game over!!!

Jumping too fast !!!

kp posted:

Dave posted:

@ Django.

Do you agree all of Charandass  vote prior to the NCV are valid in the National Assembly. 

Please provide a honest straight forward answer. 

Yes or No. to my question.

That's a hard one, wait for awhile, answers are being emailed from Guyana. You don't want the man to implicate himself, then he will be fired.

Always making up stories, fired from what ??

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

His vote was valid when passing budgets and legislations.  Why suddenly his vote is invalid?

The Judge will decide. There are some grey areas with his NCV.

You can’t have it both ways. 

you claimed the judge will decide then follow up with “ some grey areas with the [NCM”] NCV

WTF. 

Too hard for you !!!

ronan posted:

there is a special carve-out in the Guyana Constitution - Article 106 - dealing with the 'overthrow' of a legally elected Government by NCV for a reason

it is grave business

i again offer the USA comparison which, while inexact, provides a kind of clarity the scampish, hurry-up-before-they-ketch-on, GT media assets of Jagdeo husslin to avoid at ALL COSTS:

- what if Charandaas Persaud was a (Canadian) dual-citizen US Senator illegally occupying that seat who cast the deciding vote to impeach a hypothetical sitting US president?

then promptly requests Canadian Consular assistance as he rushes to the airport, leaves the country using his Canadian passport, and hunkers down in Toronto telling all who would listen "so what if i was bribed?"

how do y'all think the Supreme Court would rule?

how do y'all think the court of public opinion would rule?

how would a free, independent media treat this? -

- what if Charandaas Persaud was a (Canadian) dual-citizen US Senator illegally occupying that seat who cast the deciding vote to impeach a hypothetical sitting US president?

There are several Congressmen (even Obama and Trump) who claim dual citizenship. The US Constitution does not address this issue. The Guyana Constitution does. I am sure dual citizens would have voted for impeachment in the past, but this has not been a factor. Those Parliamentarians in Guyana must have known or should have known, and had an obligation to know what the Constitution says about this issue. The fact that they choose to ignore it is no excuse. Its not OK to claim precedent that dates back to Janel Jagan.

Comparison with the US is not a good one…maybe a parliamentary democracy, rather than a presidential democracy like the US, might be better looked at for lessons learned.  

then promptly requests Canadian Consular assistance as he rushes to the airport, leaves the country using his Canadian passport, and hunkers down in Toronto telling all who would listen "so what if i was bribed?"

If Charandass was doing this in the US, he would have no need to hurriedly leave the country. The man was threaten in broad daylight, could not even trust the Home Minister…and lets not pretend, you know very well that the man’s life would have been in danger and he would have been subjected to the worst type of society. Guyana’s political culture, either welcomes or sanctions political violence…Rodney, the Buxton killings, Sash Sawh…the list goes on.

how do y'all think the Supreme Court would rule?

how do y'all think the court of public opinion would rule?

None of the GNIers have a crystal ball. In my opinion, if its not in the US Constitution, then the US Supreme Court might sanction the impeachment without consideration that the American Charandas is also a US citizen.  The sanction on the individual would be a political, rather than legal, because members of his constituency may not re-elect him to office.

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

His vote was valid when passing budgets and legislations.  Why suddenly his vote is invalid?

The Judge will decide. There are some grey areas with his NCV.

Djangy bhai, How come when you are cornered about facts and legal decisions, you resort to: let the courts decide and the judge will decide that? Isn't this a cop-out or dodging the issue?

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

His vote was valid when passing budgets and legislations.  Why suddenly his vote is invalid?

The Judge will decide. There are some grey areas with his NCV.

Djangy bhai, How come when you are cornered about facts and legal decisions, you resort to: let the courts decide and the judge will decide that? Isn't this a cop-out or dodging the issue?

Where am copping out bhai, made a post on another thread concerning dual citizenship sitting as MP,s  and when the amendment was made.

It's unconstitutional the members who hold dual citizenship lied on their declaration forms submitted to GECOM.Some of the members from both political parties are culprits. Lying are common grounds for debarment.

Django posted:

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

How the hell did the government get into office with the vote of that same illegal member? 

So Charrandass vote get the Coalition Gov't in office ? think and rephrase your post. Noticeably some one like your erroneous post.

His vote was valid when passing budgets and legislations.  Why suddenly his vote is invalid?

The Judge will decide. There are some grey areas with his NCV.

Djangy bhai, How come when you are cornered about facts and legal decisions, you resort to: let the courts decide and the judge will decide that? Isn't this a cop-out or dodging the issue?

Where am copping out bhai, made a post on another thread concerning dual citizenship sitting as MP,s  and when the amendment was made.

It's unconstitutional the members who hold dual citizenship lied on their declaration forms submitted to GECOM.Some of the members from both political parties are culprits.

With all due respect, does this hold true before the NCV? If it doesn't, please explain why? If it does, does this mean all APNU members must resign their seats immediately and every bill they voted for will be null and void? Does this mean the PNC/AFC government is minority government and should vacate office immediately?