Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
There are rogue elements everywhere. I'd bet if you had lived a that time you would've been one, as you are now.


Oh so its the rogues who chased the Arawaks out of many Caribbean islands, and harassed them throughout South America. Well how come the peaceful Caribs didnt stop them?
FM
quote:
Originally posted by caribj:
quote:
Originally posted by antabanta:
This was unique to Amerinds at the time? The rest of you weren't killing each other? You never stopped!!


Anta tell me who else other than Amerindians lived in Guyana before it was colonized.

Dou you mean before it was colonised by the English? Then the answer is: Spanish and their descendants, the Venezuelans.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
]
Dou you mean before it was colonised by the English? Then the answer is: Spanish and their descendants, the Venezuelans.



Yes I know you loved Spanish domination. Especially the way they abused the bodies of Amerindian females and killed the males.

face it Lucas the Spanish had no interest in what is todays Guyana which is way tiny bands of Dutch traders were able to set up shop.

You really are ignorant of your country's history.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by caribj:
quote:
Originally posted by antabanta:
This was unique to Amerinds at the time? The rest of you weren't killing each other? You never stopped!!


Anta tell me who else other than Amerindians lived in Guyana before it was colonized.
No one. Once again allow me explain the error in your argument. Were there other peoples throughout the world killing each other at the time, and if so, and if killing each other is your criteria for inferiority, how does that make anyone better than the Amerindians?
A little bit more clarity... just for you. Before you arrived from wherever were you not killing each other?
A
It is an ass that thinks a group falling under the rubric of a race however it is conceived to be can ever be neutral. That much is self evident as the term implies the are not like others and have their reasons why.

It also matters not whether they quarreled or were cannibals or whatever other pejorative one may establish as typical of them they; their land is their land and only the emerged conventions as to ownership matters. All of us have such conventions otherwise we cannot be speaking of rights one way or another.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
It is an ass that thinks a group falling under the rubric of a race however it is conceived to be can ever be neutral. That much is self evident as the term implies the are not like others and have their reasons why.

It also matters not whether they quarreled or were cannibals or whatever other pejorative one may establish as typical of them they; their land is their land and only the emerged conventions as to ownership matters. All of us have such conventions otherwise we cannot be speaking of rights one way or another.

Those of us who are neither black or white are neutra! Big Grin
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×