baseman posted:Nah, Bush had to deal with 9/11 and an overheated housing market which exploded. He did not create that, he inherited it when it was already a run away train, green lighted by Greenspan!!
One would expect, with the major inflection under Bush's watch, the surge under Obama would have been a bit more acute!! That growth seen under Obama seem like natural workforce expansion as opposed to an absorption of the unemployed. Now, does that not square with the workforce participation? Who you think bore the brunt? That squares with the Black employment situation.
I ask again, tell me what has been done in almost eight years to correct the Black unemployment situation!
OK so net increase of 1.2 million under Bush, vs. 9 million (SO FAR AS OBAMA still had a year to go as those numbers refer to Dec 2015),and yet you still think that Bush was a better president!
But here is the joke. YOUR GOP want to remove the regulatory oversight and tighter compliance over the banking system that Obama put in place.
So why are you blaming Clinton and Obama when it is clear that Bush did NOTHING to regulate the banks, and Trump will REMOVE what regulation that there is!
Obama learned the lesson of lax regulation, and even Schumer, who was part of this mess, admit to their mistake.
NO. The GOP want to do it AGAIN!