Skip to main content

Reply to "Elderly couple explains how Ramjattan conspired with others to deprive them of property"

Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

Again, this exposes the shameless nature of the PPP.  Any payment to a client is made to the lawyer, regardless of the terms of representation.  Moreover, this payment will be made publicly.

Ramjattan was yesterday 'privately' badgering the AG to release the cheque to him during a side discussion in the lobby of parliament.

 

The victim in this matter was apparently paid off and left the jurisdiction so my question to you is; why is Ramjattan who claimed to have offered his services pro bono still interested in obtaining this cheque?

 

Could it be that he has been instructed by his client to do so?

If that's the case why didn't Ramjattan urge his client who was absent on 17 occasions, causing the case to be dismissed, to go to court?

Did Ramjattan facilitate the 'paying off' of his client by the tow accused?

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×