Skip to main content

Reply to "Granger names three sugar estates to be retained; calls on Region Five to “forget party loyalty”"

Drugb posted:
ba$eman posted:
 
 

If the PPP could not make it work, why anyone think the PNC could or will.  With all due respect, the PPP could not turn back the tide of inevitability, the writing was on the wall for a long time.

The question still remains, what did the PPP do to transform the fortunes of the average sugar worker?  Why did the PPP not spearhead diversification and alternative employment to keep the constituency intact?  Lack of action has provided the hand to the PNC for them to play as they wish, and it will not be to the benefit of the PPP. 

The PPP's back was not against the wall at the time, they themselves had not economic plan to move away from sugar, they were riding the run on gold. They kicked the can down the road and now the inept jackasses in the PNC are left to fumble the ball. 

They kicked the can down the road makes them as inept as the PNC.  The PNC is looking at this through the lenses of a strategic outcome, as such, the will kick the can in a corner and leave it to rust. They have nothing to lose, and more to gain!

The PPP did well tactically, but strategically they were/are inept.  They handed this on a platter to the PNC.  Don't blame the PNC for playing they game they want.

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×