Until you can show some proof of your allegations, it's just cheap rum shop gossip.
People on GNI think that they are so important. Its not up to Shaitaan to prove anything as he is merely repeating those accusations, and embellishing them.
It is up to the AFC to show proof that allegations of internal party corruption are lies, and that those who make them are PPP soup drinkers.
Because the PPP doesn't care whether these accusations are true or not. They want to highlight to Guyanese, that the AFC is no less corrupt than is the PPP. Silence on the part of the AFC then suggests that they are unable to discredit these reports.
No party can afford to have bad news sink in without responding to it, and definitely NOT the AFC, which already made a risky move by joining with the PNC.
If you make an allegation, you should have proof or you're just being a scandalous big man repeating gossip.
If I were Cathy Hughes, how do I go about providing proof that I accepted money which was not earned? Sounds a bit like providing proof that unicorns do not exist. If the woman is doing PR work, she ought to be paid for it as a professional. In the same manner that Moses was paid by NICIL for providing legal services to citizens who were relocated by the Berbice Bridge.