I might not have the intellectual acumen to understand all of this. However, my intellectually inhibited response is.
1. I thought granger was schooled in West Indian and Caribbean history. I might be wrong.
2. Your analogy does not work because your understanding and interpretation of Roman history is incorrect.
3. Men on mission often become dictators And have their own definition of benovelence which might include depriving people of their fundamental rights and to the extreme, their life. What needs to be created are institutions and processes that lend themselves to an inclusive democracy where we are provided opportunities to make meaning participation in government and opportunities and supports to develop our potential, lending to the development of our nation and family.
4. You are not asking for a honeymoon period, you want us to give just constructive criticism. i am ok with that but what about others, even you. So many crazy statements on this board. How is that going to happen.
5. are you suggesting that it is ok for the executive president to phone a member of the judiciary and influence the decisions made by that member of the judiciary? This is illegal, a breach of the constitution, dictatorial, etc.
6. This is a spin that David is the only one who can do it. 49.2 percent of the population disagree with this assertion and you depreciate so many people who can do the same thing, or even better. This is the same person who said that no rigging occurred during the pnc years, closed his eyes to the possibility that Rodney was assassinated.
7. Good leaders invite criticism and consider those criticisms when making decisions so that de ions include people instead if exclude.
i have other comments to make but leave it to others to add to the discussion. Ok, let's keep this civil and discuss the ideas presented.