Dave posted:Django, who has time to analyze those links . Charles Ramson, take the CCJ ruling and puts it in context.. it’s posted about.
The question is, did the brilliant lawyer said anything wrong- Djanjo
Django wutliss. The judges had set forth July 12, 2019 for consequential orders. It was under the threat of severe consequential orders that Patterson resigned prior to July 12, 2019. But his resignation does not relieve Granger of violating the constitution in 2017. If Granger did not violate the constitution in 2017, why did he appoint Singh only after getting Jagdeo to 'nominate' her. If Patterson just resigned ordinarily, why didn't he just despoticly appoint Singh without having Jagdeo 'nominate' her first?
Then we have the whooping that the CCJ placed on Granger for not having elections on time given the demands of the NCV. But if Django wishes to subject himself to willful ignorance, he can do so at his own peril.