Originally Posted by Mr.T:
The third man who had been charged, Kevin O’Neil, was earlier freed on a no-case submission by his counsel, Mr. George Thomas. Thomas’ submission was based on the ground that O’Neil was more of a spectator than a participant; the judge had agreed with the submission.
Surely he should have been given a prison sentence through guilt by association? He did not report the crime, so he was not an innocent bystander.
Well, Mr know iT all, that's some deep fact-base analysis you just elaborated above. The people close to the investigation seem to have come to a different conclusion. You need to go tell them why they wrong.