You had no damn point to begin with. One has to involve themselves with both sides to gain resonance with one or the other to contain the conflict. Your vainglorious assumption that you have something that is different and distinct from the legacy of the English ( hence the European entelechy) is your own delusion. All the intellectual gems you so gleefully cling to as the foundation of your thinking were seeded in the brains of western Europe.quote:Originally posted by Henry:
You manage to miss the point, while simultaneously oversimplifying matters. The British involve themselves in conflicts to which they are a third party, such as Gaddafi vs. the rebels, and they involve themselves on both sides. They are in fact intellectually empty, but they have a developed creed, sometimes called geopolitics, by which they mean to control and prolong other nations' disputes, to the effect of exhausting and dominating other nations.
