Skip to main content

Reply to "SOCU Refuses to Release Names of Those Blacklisted"

Keffer posted:
cain posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:
cain posted:

Stop being silly now. Imagine one (or more) of these people are guilty of an offense, do you really think they would want to see their name(s) being published for all to see? If this was done you crybabies would have complained bitterly about the govt exposing these poor poor people.

What offense are they guilty of?

More than likely tiefin. I agree this govt is moving too slow those persons who they have info on should be already charged. Anil's name should be first on the list, underscored and hilited.

As expected, Granger and his goons are operating in an 'ass-backward' and vindictive manner ! In law, there is the cardinal principle of  'presumption of innocence until proven guilty' so, if the modus operandi of the dumb-asses in the government is to prevent citizens from leaving the country, it seems to me that they are violating the rights of the people ! Why should Nandalall's name be on any list or highlighted? Has he been convicted of anything that renders him a risk to the country ?

Nations have different reasons and motives.  The whole world need not know as it breeds inaccuracies misjudgement.  If you have an unresolved case, not yet proven innocent or guilty, they may stop you from leaving.  It's not a judgement one way or the other.  If you owe debt, obligations, student loans (scholarship) etc then can prevent you leaving unless you leave collateral.  In Guyana, unpaid taxes are one reason as tax laws are not enforceable outside.  Nations have different rules based on how they feel their ability to get to you if you are abroad!

For this reason, it should not be made public as the person is not guilty until proven.  And even then, it may not be as people perceive!

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×