@Spugum posted:Do you even understand the arguments associated with the 33/32? You are a simpleton, period! Stop trying to play smart with your nonsense arguments, they are boring. It was Ralph Ramkarran that first advanced the argument about "half plus one" which is what the law actually says. But you are too mentally redundant to understand. The CCJ ruled differently but that does not mean the arguments shouldn't have been tested. You know nothing about Law and the Courts so quit the pretending
Both sides claimed to win. Have you observed the recent USA general elections? When the votes are close both sides will do that. Again pretender, stop playing smart, the nonsense you post betrays you
Which brings us back to what transpired at the recount - l know you hate facing the recount results. 47 boxes with no statutory documents, dead people voted and the police confirmed hundreds voted who were not in the country - the real finger is thought to be over four thousand eight hundred. Again, the PPP should stop hiding and face the figures in an investigation by the courts
Using Ralph Ramkarran as a measure of 32/33 interpretation is like referenced dankey behavior- one dankey bray the whole flock follows..lol..
Both sides claim to win yes but one side was using forged SOPs. The PPP plus all observers had in their possession copies of valid SOPs that confirmed their win. Check out initial results column where the riggers use a cardboard box and bedsheet to display forged SOPs numbers giving the coalition the victory.
It was only after the US, EU, OAS and caricom refuse to endorse a rigged election where the riggers action was broadcast live worldwide, the dead people vote theory came about.
I guess when the petition reached the CCJ y’all gona have Mingo and Lolobai to present the forged SOPs via their cardboard box and bedsheet hahahahaha [maniacal laughter]
