Shaitaan lets compare the PPP with APNU AFC.
PPP selects a black woman who has no political experience and will bring no votes. Her role will be like that of the First Lady...engaging in a few female empowerment programs and staying well away from issues of race. Indeed she is likely to be that bourgeois Negro who Hinds refers to who will aways try to negate the fact of race, merely because she is lucky enough to be one of the few black tokens selected by the PPP, and so she doesn't care about the majority of blacks EXCLUDED.
APNU AFC. The PM will be given a role is selecting appointees to a variety of committees, commissions, and state corporations, in addition to being responsible for designing the staffing and structure of the ministries. He will be assigned two ministries which address Indian security concerns Agriculture (sugar and rice) and National Security (the issue of Indian under representation in the armed forces). In addition the AFC is guaranteed 40% of the ministries, even though it will most likely not bring in more than 20% of the votes received by the coalition, and certainly no where near 40%, unless the PPP implodes.
The PM turns out to be an Indian who is quite popular among the grass roots Indian population, even if they are confused by what he is trying to do.
So we have.
1. The PPP which remains an Indian party, assigning blacks to token roles, and making not the slightest acknowledgement of African/mixed ethnic anxieties. The PPP feels that it can win by raising Indian anxieties about Africans, and clearly doesn't care how that impacts how Africans perceive them.
2. APNU AFC which will represent an African alliance with Indian interests. While this will be African dominated the Indians (Nagamootoo) will be assigned significant roles, and will also have the power to remove the Africans from power by merely exiting the coalition. The AFC will have 12 seats.
Given that the prospects of APNU winning 33 seats on its own are a zero probability (this will suggest that the PPP only wins 20 seats) then an AFC exit will trigger a constitutional crisis.
Now what power do Africans have over the PPP.
Shaitaan, try as you should to be a GUYANESE, in other words attempting to have empathy with BOTH the Indian and African security dilemma. Because if you do you will see that in PRACTICAL terms the APNU AFC allows more scope for this than does the PPP.
But of course you as an Indo KKK will never see this, because you care only about spreading racial panic.
FACT. APNU cannot and will NOT have the power that the PNC had, because there will be no tolerance for the blatant rigging which occurred in the Burnham years.