Skip to main content

Reply to "Vote recount order collides with election law- Caribbean Court judge, ANUG lawyer"

@BGMAN posted:

If you are referring to the observation reports, which I viewed some on livestream, dead people and migrants voting were allegations.

The CARICOM report called them a fishing expedition. The missing documents are the sole responsibility of the Secretariat, not the voters.

The 2011 and 2015 election results for each polling station cannot give anyone an idea of voting patterns. In many countries throughout the world there is a subset of voters called swing voters.

They change their party support based on many factors, for example, current economic conditions, party platforms, governing party performance, etc.. Statistically speaking, two election cycles cannot give anyone an idea of voting patterns. The ethnic make up of Guyana has changed over the years. Most of the swing voters most probably come from the Amerindians and Mixed Race groups.

Guyana is at a point whereby you will  see changes in the governing party because the people’s needs are changing and they are more demanding of their government. Political Parties will have to work very hard to maintain their bases.

Long Live Democracy.

On the live streams that's the only claims seen ? Guyana's voting pattern are race based by the two major ethnic group ,nothing can change that in a short span of time. There is no doubt about swing voters ,Amerindians and Mixed .I don't think your last two paragraph is applicable to Guyana .

Also the only data available in detail is 2011 and 2015 ,it's information one can use for voting patterns ,along with the demographics across the country .What's noticeable your arguments are dependent on others views ,instead of your own analysis.

Django
Last edited by Django
×
×
×
×
×
×