Drugb posted:Please provide the evidence of these claims. As usual you lie and expect us to believe. Show the numbers of Guyanese flooding the island prior to CSME implementation in 2006 and the amendment in 2008 citing sources. Lack of sources will incur marks being taken off of your final grade
--Prof Druggie.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/caribbean...guyaneseinbdos.shtml
In 2006 Barbados was quite hostile to Guyanese.
1. These Guyanese clearly had to have been present in large numbers in Barbados prior to 2006.
2. Barbados would NOT be tossing out teachers and nurses given that these people were specifically recruited into Barbados mainly to work in gov't owned institutions and had work permits.
3. I draw attention to the fact that the CSME rules in force in 2006 were limited to professionals and to people in managerial and supervisory positions. Please outline how many Guyanese would have had professional, managerial or supervisory expertise to work in the tourist industry. Clearly then the Guyanese in Barbados UNDER CSME would have been there in OTHER occupations, the largest being in teaching and nursing!