ksazma posted:ba$eman posted:ksazma posted:Very simple. Terrorism is if the act is definitely committed by a Muslim. Mostly, it is not terrorism if the act is committed by a non-Muslim. It is necessary to first cross the threshold of if the perpetrator is a Muslim or not before you can move to what their action is.
Stop talking schupitness. But when them bannas chant allah-o-akbar when dem shoot-up, it leads one to such conclusions.
I was asking about this particular incident.
You stated above that you don't know of this event. That is expected since the news today did not handle this shooting with the same frenzy they usually do the ones they suspect are by Muslims. I don't expect any memorials like we saw in the other cases either.
Unless we later determine that the perpetrator was indeed a Muslim.
In Western countries, whenever an attack is done by a Muslim ,it is announced through out the media, because there are copy cats to follow or there will be multiple attacks. Look at London today again there was another vehicle ran over a crowd of people, this is just days after the attack on the bridge to parliament.