The AFC has contested TWO elections and ha sfailed miserably TWICE. While they aren't perfect neither is either the PNC or the PPP.
Guyanese rejected the AFC TWICE. Why? RACE!
So don't come to me whining that Guyanese are mere victims of the PPP and the PNC. Indians and Africans created and sustain those DEMONS and we ought to take the responsibility for that.
CribMan, you're making my point for me. The AFC cannot crack the PPP/PNC Indian/Black polling divide. So try something different bannaz.
Indians vote PPP even though they think its corrupt, because they fear black man rule, and they insist that the PPP panders to black people (Cheddi Blackman, you might recall).
Africans vote PNC, even though they are self serving, potential soup lickers, and possibly corrupt because they feel that they are punishing under "collie rule". And now Granger goes and apologizes to get Indian votes. This in an era where some are resurrecting Burnham as a "hero" and damning black people like me who detest him. as being destructive to black people. I am told this by 30 something year olds who LIVE in Guyana.
So let Granger apologize and see what happens.
Note to you. The 41% who voted PNC aren't asking for an apology, so it will be obvious who is, even though you disguise it with the euphemistic "Guyanese".
Kari even David Hinds, who was highly critical of the PNC up to a mere 5 years ago, is now an active member of APNU. As a man who was almost killed by Burnham, he is a prefect candidate to demand an apology, and yet he is more concerned about the plight of poor young Africans, and the festering danger that this group potentially presents, if their concerns aren't addressed.
David Hinds has said that all (poor) black people have now is the PNC. This to illustrate the African dilemma, with a deep tone of regret. This a man who was an enemy of that party a scant 20 years ago!