Skip to main content

Reply to "Why isn't the PPP calling for neutral 3rd party oversight of H2H . . . it's obvious to all sane by now that "election date" is NOT the real issue"

ronan posted:
Stormborn posted:
ronan posted:
VishMahabir posted:
ronan posted:

the PPP opposition is hell bent on 'elections' with a FRAUDULENT, EXPIRED voters roll . . . period!! full stop

people, this may take some thought and fine tuning . . . but anyone hearing echoes of Jagdeo's scorn of ABC help during the narco-fueled 2000s 'crime wave' featuring Roger Khan?

i doubt is it just me

The Roger Khan issue is a separate issue (and the PPP should be attacked on that issue), but you sneak it in here...

my post has very little to do specifically with the Roger Khan "issue"

he is being used here as a marker for a particular time and circumstance

curb your enthusiasm for unthinking reaction to most everything i write that discomfits received wisdom of PPP 'civil society'

phone a friend before you hit "post reply" next time

arite?

The parallel you chose is specifically to suggest a crooked regime cannot protest the false claim that the current list is fraudulent ( ie someone padded it) Secondly, it is to that the PPP is a corrupt regime so they have no moral authority to disavow the fake claims you constantly repeat here. Lastly, H2H registration as a necessary exercise is bogus. We know that because free and fair elections are held by most democratic societies through voluntary registration.

what does all that have to do with my response to VishMahabir?

you too need to phone a friend

smh

It precisely illustrates your malicious intent. 

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×