Reply to "Wismar contextualized with the 1964 low-intensity tribal war . . . Eusi Kwayana is correct - there is no guilty "RACE""

ksazma posted:

Anyone making the claim that there is “no guilty race” in what occurred in Wismar in 1964 is at best grossly dishonest.

Using the term “no guilty race” as opposed to ‘no innocent race’ is a wicked way to try to minimize the violence of blacks on Indians as well as violence of blacks on blacks who defended Indians.

The keyword in both cases is ‘violence of blacks’. Unfortunately, violence of blacks continued for decades after 1964.

Wismar aside, all you heard was Blacks was committing violent acts, no East Indians committed any acts of violence, is that so ?

Did you make any attempt to read the report and the 19 days of transcripts of the Commission of Inquiry, just asking.