Zed posted:Assuming that you caterization of those individuals are correct, are we to assume that if someone has a leaning towards the PPP. Then that person is not fit and proper?
Then, how do you justify Patterson since he has a leaning towards the PNC and has lied on his resume. Is he fit and proper? Does he fit all the criteria Granger had demanded, especially does he have wide knowledge and experience in administering elections.
So, is a lawyer who represents a client in court, he has a leaning towards the philosophy of that individual? Also, as far as I know, the PPP nor Jagdeo never filed a third term lawsuit. Also, what about BS Roy. Why is he not fit and proper because he made a ruling supported by another learned judge?
also, what about Annette Arjuna Martin. Who is she leaning towards? What is your objection? Same for Earnest La Fleur, Datadin and the others you have not highlighted?
what is the problem with joe Singh? Is he PPP learning, not fit and able? He has conducted elections. Has integrity, impartial as far as we know.
From your highlights, 50 percent of the three lists were still fit and proper. And please do not give me the story that the whole list has to be fit and able. That is like goat shit waiting for breeze to blow.
I think that you got some talking points someplace and sticking by it. Trying to obfuscate by such nonsense.
I have more to say but no time. I am going to a function and I will pray that you use your god given sense and not think that we are stupid or use the usual refrain that who criticize Granger on this issue are ppp supporters. Should we use the same logic with you?
Spoken like a true Jagdeo follower,who the fella Richardson was instigated by to challenge the Presidential term limits??
Jagdeo have ambitions to be become President again,may be you don't observe that,my take is it will back fire.