That number is more like 1.00 today with the AFC effectively becoming dead meat. 

Excellent observation.

Na tek worries, Granger will bring back rigging and can easily change that number to suite himself. 

Suit

Thanks 

yuji22 posted:

That number is more like 1.00 today with the AFC effectively becoming dead meat. 

Excellent observation.

Na tek worries, Granger will bring back rigging and can easily change that number to suite himself. 

Where is AFC in the APNU equation ?

Gilbakka posted:

APNU = PNC + WPA, GAP, JP & NFA.

In the 2001 election the PNC got 165,866 votes. The other 4 parties together got 12,693 votes, ie 0.08% of the PNC votes.

2001 election was the last time these 5 parties contested separately.

Using that benchmark year, APNU = 1 + 0.08 =1.08. Put another way, 1 + 4  = 1.08. Bottom line, APNU is effectively PNC.

President David Granger speaks at the launching of the local government elections campaign for A Partnership for National Unity (APNU). Supporting him are (from left) Minister of Communities Ronald Bulkan, APNU Campaign Manager Amna Ally and APNU General Secretary Joseph Harmon. (Photo by Terrence Thompson)

https://www.stabroeknews.com/2...cal-govt-campaign-2/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This picture says it !!!

Django posted:

yuji22 posted:

That number is more like 1.00 today with the AFC effectively becoming dead meat. 

Excellent observation.

Na tek worries, Granger will bring back rigging and can easily change that number to suite himself. 

Where is AFC in the APNU equation ?

Django posted:

Gilbakka posted:

APNU = PNC + WPA, GAP, JP & NFA.

In the 2001 election the PNC got 165,866 votes. The other 4 parties together got 12,693 votes, ie 0.08% of the PNC votes.

2001 election was the last time these 5 parties contested separately.

Using that benchmark year, APNU = 1 + 0.08 =1.08. Put another way, 1 + 4  = 1.08. Bottom line, APNU is effectively PNC.

President David Granger speaks at the launching of the local government elections campaign for A Partnership for National Unity (APNU). Supporting him are (from left) Minister of Communities Ronald Bulkan, APNU Campaign Manager Amna Ally and APNU General Secretary Joseph Harmon. (Photo by Terrence Thompson)

https://www.stabroeknews.com/2...cal-govt-campaign-2/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This picture says it !!!

Are you pointing out Amna and Ronald?

Amna and Ronald are PNC,the picture shows members of the PNC and none from the other parties in APNU.

Suh Gill is correct APNU is effectively PNC.

Django posted:

Amna and Ronald are PNC,the picture shows members of the PNC and none from the other parties in APNU.

Suh Gill is correct APNU is effectively PNC.

There was no APNU or AFC or any other party since the government was formed. It was always PNC. The man is a Burnhamite. He will not disrespect Forbes' party.

Gill is right.

Anyway, LGE is not an accurate measure of the pulse of the nation.

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

Amna and Ronald are PNC,the picture shows members of the PNC and none from the other parties in APNU.

Suh Gill is correct APNU is effectively PNC.

There was no APNU or AFC or any other party since the government was formed. It was always PNC. The man is a Burnhamite. He will not disrespect Forbes' party.

Bhai,

AFC made up of political defectors from PNC and PPP. It's known PNC (APNU) with the majority wants to call the shots.

Granger may be Burnhamite,at the least he not corruptible.

If the 4 mini parties had decided to contest upcoming LGE separately and individually they would be wiped out most likely. That's the implication of the numbers. Ditto general election.

Mitwah posted:

Gill is right.

Anyway, LGE is not an accurate measure of the pulse of the nation.

Also the method of the LGE Election is different than National and Regional.

Winning majority doesn't equate to winning Nat.&Reg. Elections.

Django posted:

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

Amna and Ronald are PNC,the picture shows members of the PNC and none from the other parties in APNU.

Suh Gill is correct APNU is effectively PNC.

There was no APNU or AFC or any other party since the government was formed. It was always PNC. The man is a Burnhamite. He will not disrespect Forbes' party.

Bhai,

AFC made up of political defectors from PNC and PPP. It's known PNC (APNU) with the majority wants to call the shots.

Granger may be Burnhamite,at the least he not corruptible.

But he tolerates the shit. He knows about it and turns a blind eye. He is equally guilty...an unindicted co-conspirator.

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

Amna and Ronald are PNC,the picture shows members of the PNC and none from the other parties in APNU.

Suh Gill is correct APNU is effectively PNC.

There was no APNU or AFC or any other party since the government was formed. It was always PNC. The man is a Burnhamite. He will not disrespect Forbes' party.

Bhai,

AFC made up of political defectors from PNC and PPP. It's known PNC (APNU) with the majority wants to call the shots.

Granger may be Burnhamite,at the least he not corruptible.

But he tolerates the shit. He knows about it and turns a blind eye. He is equally guilty...an unindicted co-conspirator.

Disagree.

Look what happened to Norton.

I am being fair,no kowtowing.

Django posted:

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

Bhai,

AFC made up of political defectors from PNC and PPP. It's known PNC (APNU) with the majority wants to call the shots.

Granger may be Burnhamite,at the least he not corruptible.

But he tolerates the shit. He knows about it and turns a blind eye. He is equally guilty...an unindicted co-conspirator.

Disagree.

Look what happened to Norton.

I am being fair,no kowtowing.

One out of 100...batting 1%.

Currently -- 2015 -- it seems that ....

APNU = PNCR + AFC + GAP + WPA + JFAP + NFA

Now, it is probably

1 + 5 = 1.02