55,000-year-old human skull found in Israeli cave backs theory of African origins, researchers say
Shawn Conner, Postmedia News | January 29, 2015 | Last Updated: Jan 29 12:27 AM ET, Source
Shawn Conner, Postmedia News | January 29, 2015 | Last Updated: Jan 29 12:27 AM ET, Source
Shawn Conner, Postmedia News | January 29, 2015 | Last Updated: Jan 29 12:27 AM ET, Source
Omry Barzilai of the Israel Antiquities Authority on Wednesday holds a 55,000-year-old skull found in an excavation in Manot Cave near the northern Israeli city of Nahariya.
VANCOUVER β The discovery of part of an early human skull in Israel is shedding new light on the origins of man.
The 55,000-year-old skull is believed to have belonged to the oldest-known human species that is a direct ancestor of modern Homo sapiens.
Francesco Berna, an archeology professor at Simon Fraser University, and Megan Thibodeau, a masterβs student, were involved in the find.
βWhatβs surprising is the combination of the skull having very modern traits, which are very similar to modern African populations and European populations, and the age β about 55,000 years,β Prof. Berna said.
βTo my knowledge, this is probably one of, if not the, oldest fossils that is so close to us.β
The international team of researchers was led by Israel Hershkovitz of Tel Aviv University, Ofer Marder of Ben-Gurion University and Omry Barzilai of the Israel Antiquity Authority.
A paper published in Nature and co-authored by Prof. Berna documents the discovery of the skull at Manot Cave in western Galilee. The find supports the hypothesis that humansβ direct ancestors were originally from Africa, and not Europe.
βBeing in Israel, in the Middle East between Africa and Europe, it supports the out-of-Africa model of modern human origin,β Prof. Berna said. βWe came, in several waves, out of Africa into the Middle East, and into Europe and Asia. Thereβs strong fossil evidence of that.β
Other, even older, humanoid skulls have been discovered in the region, he said. βBut they differ from this new skull that was found, and from us. Theyβre older and more primitive.β
Prof. Bernaβs area of expertise is in site formation processes. He was able to help the Israeli team determine the geological processes involved in the formation of the site.
βAt the beginning, I was telling them, βOkay, I think we should excavate here rather than there because thatβs where weβre going to find stuff more [in position] and that is less re-worked.ββ
He could also determine the kind of activity the
inhabitants were doing in specific areas of the cave.
βIn one area, we can tell there were some established hearths, and another area, which is full of archeological material, we can see they werenβt there that much,β he said.
βIndirectly, I helped them understand the best dating methods and methodologies to assess the dating of the site and for the skull.β
Ms. Thibodeau helped Prof. Berna determine details about fire use in the cave.
Archeologists have been excavating at Manot since its discovery five years ago. Yet they have only scratched the surface.
βThe excavation is ongoing,β Prof. Berna said. βI think itβs going to go on for several years.β
Scientists not involved with the research team praised the βfascinating new fossilβ and the cautious interpretation of its broader implications understanding the early migrations into Eurasia.
βThis fossil fits previous predictions, which is a nice rarity in our field,β said Eric Delson, a paleoanthropologist at Lehman College of the City University of New York,
βAs always, we want more fossils to document variations in and details about this presumed fossil population.β
The partial skull combines a basically modern human form with a few features also found in Neanderthals, he said. In addition, the analysis βsupports the similarity of its shapesβ to those of modern Africans and early modern humans from Europe, such as the Cro-Magnons.
He agreed the evidence βmakes it possible that this individual is (or is descended from) a βhybridβ between modern humans and Neanderthals, but as the authors note, such a conclusion cannot be reached from a single fossil, especially as hybrids between species of modern primates usually have some genetically related anatomical oddities.β
Postmedia News, with files from The New York Times
Access to this requires a premium membership.