Skip to main content

Sunday Review | CONTRIBUTING OP-ED WRITER

A Racist Turn in India

African students demonstrated against discrimination at a protest in New Delhi last June.
Deepak Malik/Demotix via Corbis

 

NEW DELHI — The Africans — Nigerians, Ghanaians, Ugandans — began leaving my neighborhood in New Delhi around December. Each week, more and more families exited. Some went to parts of Delhi considered more accepting of Africans; others to areas where the residents were thought to be less interfering in general. I have heard that some of the Ghanaian families had gone back to Africa, but I don’t know that for sure.

 

For years, they had been a part of the swirl of cultures, languages and races that makes up this part of the capital. The Nigerian women in their bright dresses out for evening strolls and the Cameroonian family with the curious-eyed baby at the ice-cream van had made a life for themselves alongside the Afghans, Tamils and Iranians.

 

On Oct. 31, about a month before the departures started, a Nigerian national, rumored to have been in the drug trade, was found dead in Goa. Nigerians in the coastal state protested his murder as an act of racism, while posters read: “We want peace in Goa. Say no to Nigerians. Say no to drugs.” One state minister threatened to throw out Nigerians living illegally. Another equated them with a cancer. He later apologized, adding that he hadn’t imagined there would be a “problem” with his statement.

 

The controversy has reverberated across the country, including in Delhi, 1,200 miles away, where the tolerance of African neighbors has turned into suspicion and even hostility.

 

One night, a police constable rang my doorbell. “Have you seen any man from the Congo entering and leaving the building?” he asked. “African man,” he clarified. He said he had received a report that a local resident was friendly with Africans, and he wanted to know, was this true? The question surprised me; neighborhood battles here are waged over water and parking spaces, not over ethnicity. Now neighbors had become nervous of neighbors.

 

Once the African communities had been singled out, complaints against them bubbled up like filthy water, in Jangpura, in Khirki Extension, in the alleyways off Paharganj, anywhere in Delhi they lived.

 

The fragile hospitality gave way to a familiar litany of intolerance: They were too loud, exuberant and dirty; the women were loose, the men looked you directly in the eye, they were drug takers and traffickers, and worse.

Residents of Khirki Extension, whose rambling lanes had seen an influx of artists, journalists and migrants, conducted their own investigation of their African neighbors, which they called the “black beauty” sting.

 

Coinciding with the city’s darkening mood, the newly elected Aam Aadmi Party in Delhi started a wave of cleanups as part of its mission to control “lawlessness.” The city’s law minister, Somnath Bharti, led a raid into Khirki Extension, claiming to be acting on residents’ complaints that Nigerians and Ugandans were involved in prostitution and drug trafficking. Media reports suggest that on the night of Jan. 15, he entered Africans’ homes with a group of vigilantes, without a warrant. In the fracas, a Ugandan woman was allegedly forced to give a urine sample, on the street, in the middle of the crowd. After she filed a complaint, Delhi’s court ordered the Police Department to pursue her case against Mr. Bharti.

 

These recent events have awakened dormant prejudices against Africans in India, aggravated by our tendency to prize fair skin over dark. “Habshi,” derived from the word “Abyssinian,” has become a common epithet for people of African descent.

 

So, on one hand, the racist turn in Delhi and Goa is unsurprising. On the other hand, we have a long, and neglected, history of cross-migration with Africa. While Indians have been settling on that continent since at least the 15th century, African roots in India run even deeper. Africans were brought over in numbers around the 13th century as slaves, but also as generals, guards, merchants, bodyguards and craftsmen. Many never went back. Now tens of thousands are here to study, and others work as chefs and in the garment and textile businesses, among other industries.

Despite our close ties and the shared history of colonialism, Africa doesn’t figure on the Indian map of curiosity and desire. Our admiration of China’s economic prowess is commonplace and unabashed; we are obsessed with the West, in terms of education, ideals of beauty and economic might. But Africa is invisible. Racist views can be spouted without consequence. Africa simply doesn’t matter.

 

There will be few repercussions for the Aam Aadmi Party if it continues with blanket policies against Africans. The party won on the promise of change, yet here it is, proving that it shares the same blindness as other, older parties.

 

These days, the Afghans and Indians stroll in my neighborhood park, enjoying the winter breeze. The Ghanaian and Cameroonian families moved away when their landlords doubled the rent only for them; the young Nigerian women left after one police visit too many.

 

Delhi’s residents say that the city belongs to everybody, because it belongs to nobody. As Bangalore and Mumbai became insular possessions, with political parties often driving out anyone who was from elsewhere, the capital claimed that it had room for all kinds of migrants, expats and outsiders. If the Aam Aadmi Party continues the divisiveness that older parties have excelled at, we’ll soon find reasons to go after all the people who live differently from “us,” who don’t belong here, who should go back to the places they came from.

 

Nilanjana S. Roy is an essayist and critic, and author of the novel “The Wildings.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

QUOTE: ' “Habshi,” derived from the word “Abyssinian,” has become a common epithet for people of African descent.'

-------------------------------------------------

Oh shucks, Rev will stop using "Cuffy lovers" now.

Look out for "Habshi lovers" from that devil.

FM

QUOTE: "... we have a long, and neglected, history of cross-migration with Africa. While Indians have been settling on that continent since at least the 15th century, African roots in India run even deeper. Africans were brought over in numbers around the 13th century as slaves, but also as generals, guards, merchants, bodyguards and craftsmen. Many never went back."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Gilbakka didn't know that.

FM

QUOTE: "A Racist Turn in India - New York Times. Do Indo-Caribbeans have a lesson for India?"

----------------------

The Guyanese calypsonian Lord Canary might advise:

"Open de door leh de black man come in

All awee ah one family."

 

Seriously, African students and workers are guests in India. They should behave as good guests do and respect the host country's culture and customs, as well as their laws.

Indians, for their part, should be good hosts and not give way to xenophobia.

FM

There are two sides to the issue. It's true, there is discrimination against Afros, but there is the same discrimination against fellow Indians from different parts, religion and caste.  The other side, there is widespread Afro organized criminal activity, at least it was well known in Bombay and many Indians fell victim and lost a lot.  Afros will find it difficult in India due to the number of people vying for a living and due to work ethics.  I don't think it's deliberate, just a fact of the circumstances.

FM
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

QUOTE: "... we have a long, and neglected, history of cross-migration with Africa. While Indians have been settling on that continent since at least the 15th century, African roots in India run even deeper. Africans were brought over in numbers around the 13th century as slaves, but also as generals, guards, merchants, bodyguards and craftsmen. Many never went back."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Gilbakka didn't know that.

Here again, maybe Rev's family got dabbed with tar brush.

cain
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

QUOTE: "... we have a long, and neglected, history of cross-migration with Africa. While Indians have been settling on that continent since at least the 15th century, African roots in India run even deeper. Africans were brought over in numbers around the 13th century as slaves, but also as generals, guards, merchants, bodyguards and craftsmen. Many never went back."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Gilbakka didn't know that.

They are considered to be outcastes.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by baseman:

There are two sides to the issue. It's true, there is discrimination against Afros, but there is the same discrimination against fellow Indians from different parts, religion and caste.  The other side, there is widespread Afro organized criminal activity, at least it was well known in Bombay and many Indians fell victim and lost a lot.  Afros will find it difficult in India due to the number of people vying for a living and due to work ethics.  I don't think it's deliberate, just a fact of the circumstances.

Baseman is right on the money here.  There is plenty of discrimination in Delhi and other large Indian cities towards Indians from East India because they look Chinese.  I say this:  It is a mortal sin when an Indian cannot recognize the Indian in his fellow indian.

 

An Indian from Bihar once told me.  You seem to know many things about my country but I do not know anything about yours.

 

I wanted to bash that ediot over the head with a piece of wood.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by baseman:

There are two sides to the issue. It's true, there is discrimination against Afros, but there is the same discrimination against fellow Indians from different parts, religion and caste.  The other side, there is widespread Afro organized criminal activity, at least it was well known in Bombay and many Indians fell victim and lost a lot.  Afros will find it difficult in India due to the number of people vying for a living and due to work ethics.  I don't think it's deliberate, just a fact of the circumstances.

 

 

Africans are likely involved in the drug trade, but are hardly likely to be engaged in activities which directly harm the average Indian.  And those in the drug trade are likely to be the traffickers who pick up drugs from Africa, which they receive from South America, and then courier over to India, where local drug traffickers take over.

 

And complaints about African women being loose is also hypocrisy.  Yes its likely that more than a few might be prostitutes, but many Indian women are themselves engaged in this activity.

 

The violence against Africans is just plain bigotry based on the obsession that Indians have with whiteness.  Most assuredly Afghanis dominate the opium trade, much more than the Africans do the cocaine trade.  Nigeria is too far away for them to be a major force without cooperation from local interests.  I am sure that opiates are cheaper in India than is cocaine, which is most likely used mainly by the elites.

 

Also if Indians fell victim to those infamous Nigerian emails than they are stupid and deserve to lose everything.  The notion that Africans are involved in robberies etc., just reflects your own insecurities about black men.

 

The notion that Indo Caribbean people have anything to teach Indians is a joke, given that they have the same stereotypes against blacks, and also their aggressive attempt to turn blacks into 3rd class citizens in Guyana.  This has become so obvious that even Caribbean people visiting Guyana notice and increasingly comment on it.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:

The notion that Indo Caribbean people have anything to teach Indians is a joke, given that they have the same stereotypes against blacks, and also their aggressive attempt to turn blacks into 3rd class citizens in Guyana.  This has become so obvious that even Caribbean people visiting Guyana notice and increasingly comment on it.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans are not integrated in a West Indian way of life.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans do not eat African-West Indian foods.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans do not sing and dance to music African-West Indians sing and dance to.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans do not live and share a common social tradition with African-West Indians.

 

I can go on and on, but why do you have to make such a blanket statement about all Indo-Caribbean people. Might you not be better off leaving the bigotry of a tiny minority of Indo-Caribbeans to that tiny group and not paint all Indo-Caribbeans with this charge? You can do better than that surely!

 

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by caribny:

The notion that Indo Caribbean people have anything to teach Indians is a joke, given that they have the same stereotypes against blacks, and also their aggressive attempt to turn blacks into 3rd class citizens in Guyana.  This has become so obvious that even Caribbean people visiting Guyana notice and increasingly comment on it.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans are not integrated in a West Indian way of life.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans do not eat African-West Indian foods.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans do not sing and dance to music African-West Indians sing and dance to.

 

I take it that Indo-Caribbeans do not live and share a common social tradition with African-West Indians.

 

I can go on and on, but why do you have to make such a blanket statement about all Indo-Caribbean people. Might you not be better off leaving the bigotry of a tiny minority of Indo-Caribbeans to that tiny group and not paint all Indo-Caribbeans with this charge? You can do better than that surely!

 

 

 

No where did I mention anything about Indo Caribbean culture.  I mention the racist stereotypes that many hold against blacks being not too dissimilar from what people in India hold.  I also mention the blatant racism by the political and business elites against blacks in Guyana.  That elite might be tiny but they are very powerful.  And the political elite certainly didn't get there without the Indian masses, and one can argue about whether the new money class, with all their corruption, would have been as powerful were Guyana not the ethnically divided nation than it is.

 

So what do Indo Caribbean people have to teach Indians about dealing with blacks?  I suggest that they have enough issues in their dealings with their Afro Caribbean neighbors than to adopt some moral high ground on this topic.

 

 What Caribbean people, who visit Guyana, comment on is the fact that within the last 10 years, and especially within the last 5, it has become obvious that blacks have been squeezed out of any role in any aspect of leadership in Guyana.  Indeed some even going as far as commenting that they detect that these elites even see blacks as scum.    The days for those attitudes having long disappeared in most other parts of the English speaking Caribbean.

 

Don't even know why you as a Guyanese felt free to open up this topic thinking that Indo Caribbean people have something to teach India, when Guyana is the very country where black/Indian hostilities within the Caribbean are strongest.  Especially when Guyanese Indians, who have migrated to these islands, have often been accused of bringing with them racist attitudes towards blacks.  And FYI I have even heard Trinidadian Indians make this claim.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

And the political elite certainly didn't get there without the Indian masses, and one can argue about whether the new money class, with all their corruption, would have been as powerful were Guyana not the ethnically divided nation than it is.

 

CaribJ, you posed and answered a fundamental question about Guyana's socio-political situation.

 

Understand this, and you will understand some of the racist stuff by Indians here that I push back against, there is a real, deep-seated fear in the psyche of Indians over rule by a party dominated by African-Guyanese and the visceral presence of a largely African-Guyanese security force, who do not know better politically. Personally, the 1973 exercise and polling in Wakenaam, is seared in my memory. And I was a Sergeant in the Cadet Corps. I saw "G" company soldiers camped in Zeelandia, Wakenaam and they were like an occupying force.

 

Now you will understand the likes of Rev, GoadieWallah, and to a lesser extent, BaseBoard and D_G. You are no different than these characters, as your response "The notion that Indo Caribbean people have anything to teach Indians is a joke, given that they have the same stereotypes against blacks, and also their aggressive attempt to turn blacks into 3rd class citizens in Guyana." shows.

 

Be a smarter individual than the likes of Rev, et al.

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:

"The notion that Indo Caribbean people have anything to teach Indians is a joke, given that they have the same stereotypes against blacks, and also their aggressive attempt to turn blacks into 3rd class citizens in Guyana."of Rev, et al.

 

 

So yes you compare this response to you that many Indo Caribbean people have the same stereotypes (black man lazy, violent) with the fact that rev says exactly that.  Hmmmm.

 

I wonder if you really thought that you would get away with that on a Guyanese forum, given the strong black/Indian tensions which exist.

 

Now when certain PNC blacks who used to post here commented that Indians didn't suffer racism under Burnham I used to correct them on it.  Was I racist for telling them that when blacks had the boot their kick was every bit as harsh against Indians as the Indian boot against blacks is today?  No.

 

So why am I racist when I tell you that there is widespread economic and political exclusion of blacks in Guyana by an Indo dominated elite for reasons best known to themselves?

 

I don't accept political paranoia as an excuse because BOTH sides use it to justify racial insensitivity to others.  So don't bring it, because as we speak many blacks will tell you that Burnham was right to oppress Indians, knowing what they would do to blacks if they had the power. What is happening to blacks in Guyana in 2014, was told to blacks in 1973 as to what would happen to them if the PPP was allowed to run Guyana.

 

 

In fact I have been told by several blacks who live in Guyana, that when black people like me criticize Burnham, we undermine black people.  I don't agree with them, but I do note that some are too young to know what Burnham had done to Guyana.  So they engage in a nostalgia about that era being one where blacks weren't completely shut out. Yes blacks have equal paranoia, and each day of the socio-economic-political warfare that is being launched against them by the Indian elite strengthens this view.

 

Stop and think what that does to Guyana if these views become more entrenched, and we have already seen indications of this.  Many Guyanese blacks only know a PPP dominated Guyana, so unlike middle aged people like me, who know full well that racial abuse was also used by the African elites in the 70s and 80s, all though know is what they have endured, especially in the Jagdeo, and now post Jagdeo era.

 

Ksri I have been asked by many Caribbean people about what is happening to blacks in Guyana.  Why the almost total domination of top level positions in Guyana by Indians (G/twn Hospital was cited as an example by one person)?  This when Guyanese blacks emerged before blacks in the rest of the Caribbean in large numbers in professional capacities. Clearly it isn't due to the fact that Guyanese blacks lacked talent as for many years the Caribbean Development Bank was heavily run by Guyanese blacks, and that bank enjoyed a AAA rating by international agencies. 

 

Many black Guyanese are using CSME freedom of movement to find work in majority black islands, and inform the locals that its racism against blacks in Guyana that forces them to leave.  The notion that in 2014 black professionals would face racism in the English speaking Caribbean strikes people as indicative that something is wrong in Guyana.

 

You may not notice it, or if you do, you may wish to ignore it.  But just as how Indians during the Burnham era had legitimate grounds to speak out against the socio-economic-political warfare that had been launched against them by the African elites.  And many blacks like David Hinds, Eusi Kwayana, and Walter Rodney supported these claims, today we see an Indian elite doing the same to blacks,  and some might claim even worse as Burnham definitely had more Indian "tokens" who had some decision making role  than the PPP has black tokens today.

 

 

 

 And also please note that I didn't call you a racist because of your comments of the behavior of Burnham and his operatives in 1973.  Coming from a black middle class G/town background he largely ignored people like me, unless I became openly involved in what he would have called anti government activity.

 

I have no idea about what happened to Indians except what I have read about, and what Indians have directly told me.  I do not debate their views on this, nor do I call them I racist for discussing Burnham's ethnically targeted abuse.  Knowing how many in the African elite felt, it isn't hard for me to believe that what you said was done to Indians actually did happen.

 

You need to extend the same courtesy to blacks when they tell you that bias against them isn't minimal activity conducted by a few deranged individuals like rev, skeldon man and others. It is systemic and institutionalized against blacks, just as it was against Indians under PNC rule.

 

FM
Last edited by Former Member

And just for you info many Caribbean blacks find aspects of Indo Caribbean culture to be exotic, and the popularity of roti I testimony to that.

 

So don't place tensions on the fact that the cultures are different, because with every generation that becomes less so.

 

Its based on attitudes.  Whereas Guyanese and Trinidadian blacks might place these attitudes within our political stalemate, when Jamaicans, Bajans and other encounter these same attitudes from Guyanese Indians they want to know why.

FM
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by baseman:

There are two sides to the issue. It's true, there is discrimination against Afros, but there is the same discrimination against fellow Indians from different parts, religion and caste.  The other side, there is widespread Afro organized criminal activity, at least it was well known in Bombay and many Indians fell victim and lost a lot.  Afros will find it difficult in India due to the number of people vying for a living and due to work ethics.  I don't think it's deliberate, just a fact of the circumstances.

 

 

Africans are likely involved in the drug trade, but are hardly likely to be engaged in activities which directly harm the average Indian.  And those in the drug trade are likely to be the traffickers who pick up drugs from Africa, which they receive from South America, and then courier over to India, where local drug traffickers take over.

 

And complaints about African women being loose is also hypocrisy.  Yes its likely that more than a few might be prostitutes, but many Indian women are themselves engaged in this activity.

 

The violence against Africans is just plain bigotry based on the obsession that Indians have with whiteness.  Most assuredly Afghanis dominate the opium trade, much more than the Africans do the cocaine trade.  Nigeria is too far away for them to be a major force without cooperation from local interests.  I am sure that opiates are cheaper in India than is cocaine, which is most likely used mainly by the elites.

 

Also if Indians fell victim to those infamous Nigerian emails than they are stupid and deserve to lose everything.  The notion that Africans are involved in robberies etc., just reflects your own insecurities about black men.

 

The notion that Indo Caribbean people have anything to teach Indians is a joke, given that they have the same stereotypes against blacks, and also their aggressive attempt to turn blacks into 3rd class citizens in Guyana.  This has become so obvious that even Caribbean people visiting Guyana notice and increasingly comment on it.

African women being loose

 

Oh, really ! 

Africa women in Africa are some of the most conservative women on the face of the Earth.  You Caribj are not getting anywhere or anything without a gold ring, a father, a Chief and elder brother all saying yes and a payed up bride price.

 

 

FM

To CaribJ, an Indian is racist by default, while Blacks are angels. The fact remains that Blacks are associated with high crime and negative stereotype in every corner of the world, not only India. 

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

To CaribJ, an Indian is racist by default, while Blacks are angels. The fact remains that Blacks are associated with high crime and negative stereotype in every corner of the world, not only India. 

 

Mitwah
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

To CaribJ, an Indian is racist by default, while Blacks are angels. The fact remains that Blacks are associated with high crime and negative stereotype in every corner of the world, not only India. 

hehehe

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

To CaribJ, an Indian is racist by default, while Blacks are angels. The fact remains that Blacks are associated with high crime and negative stereotype in every corner of the world, not only India. 

hehehe

LOL! And India is the public defecating and rape capital of the world. 

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

To CaribJ, an Indian is racist by default, while Blacks are angels. The fact remains that Blacks are associated with high crime and negative stereotype in every corner of the world, not only India. 

To druggie blacks are lazy, welfare dependent, and violent and Indians who openly discriminate against them are not being racist. 

 

He lacks the sophistication to understand that most blacks aren't criminals and should not be stereotyped as such.

 

Honduras and El Salvador are among the worlds most violent nations and there aren't large numbers of blacks involved in their notorious gangs.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Nehru:
.The fact remains that Blacks are associated with high crime and negative stereotype in every corner of the world, not only India. 

hehehe

I see you agree.  No wonder the PPP cant get decent numbers of black votes.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×