Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

This document is a reprint of Mrs Valerie Garrido-Lowe’s online report. Our goal is to distribute this very valuable information to our readers. Ms. Garrido-Lowe has no affiliation with OVNN.


What is the Guyana LCDS?


According to the LCDS website, the LCDS sets out Guyana’s approach to transition to a green economy. Its stated aim is to combat climate change while simultaneously providing economic growth and development. It sets out how Guyana’s economy can be realigned along a low carbon development path by investing payments received for avoided deforestation into strategic low carbon sectors.

 

The LCDS and GRIF
The Guyana REDD+ Investment Fund (GRIF) is the fund for the financing of activities identified under the LCDS. The Government of Norway has committed to provide up to US4250 million to the Fund by 2015.
Under the agreement with Norway, the World Bank will be the Trustee of GRIF. It will receive the money from Norway and transfer this money to the Partner Entities when a request is made.

 

Who are the Partner Entities?
The Partner Entities are the Inter American Development Bank (IDB), the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the World Bank. (Not the Government of Guyana)


The Partner Entities carry out the projects that are requested by Guyana and approved by the Steering Committee that is made up of representatives from Norway and Guyana.

 

How are payments made from GRIF?
- Once the Steering Committee agrees the allocation it will notify the World Bank and the Partner Entity (IDB, UNDP or WB) of such approval.
– The Trustee (WB) will the issue a Letter of Commitment to pay over the approved allocation
– When the Partner entity receives this letter it will send a Transfer Request to the World Bank.
– When the Transfer Request is received the World Bank will pay the requested allocation to the Partner Entity.
– The Partner entity will then make all payments to the implementing agency.

 

Can the political opposition stop payments from the GRIF?
No! The process clearly sets out that the money from Norway will be kept by the World Bank. Payment from the Fund is the sole responsibility of the Steering Committee and the Partner Entity and payments will only be approved when the Steering Committee (including Norway) is satisfied that the project meets the eligibility criteria.

 

Can Amerindian Communities and other local entities still access money from the GRIF for LCDS projects?
Yes! The agreement provides that once the projects are approved by the Steering Committee and does not exceed the amount in the Fund, money will be allocated. All projects approved by the Steering Committee whether it be Amerindian Land Titling, provision of solar panels for Hinterland communities, Micro and Small Enterprise Development or any other approved project will receive funding once they reach the eligibility criteria of the Partner Entity and the Steering Committee.

 

Can this information be verified?
Yes! Persons can check this information against what is provided by the World Bank by visiting the World Bank website: www.worldbank.org/grif

To attempt to mislead the Parliament into thinking that the $18 billion was money that would form part of the treasury was dishonest to say the least and could very well be intended to establish a false defensive position the government intends to take when it fails to reach the standards set by IDB and UNDP for accessing the fund.

This would not be the first time that the PPP/C Government would have failed to meet internationally set standards for accessing financing.

Guyanese well remember the negligence of the PPP/C administration in 2011 that resulted in Guyana not accessing $3.8 billion of EU funding for the sugar industry and the failure of that same administration to agree to benchmarks that would have allowed Guyana to secure a $4 billion security sector reform project fund from the British Government. It is clear that that the PPP administration is unwilling to actively pursue any foreign funded project with high standards of accountability and transparency. [END]

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It is clear that that the PPP administration is unwilling to actively pursue any foreign funded project with high standards of accountability and transparency.

 

Who are the people that became rich during the past 5 years under the PPP watch?

Mitwah

 The PPP do not want their gravy train stopped. They are making our nation a more despicably corrupt state than Markos Philippines or Suharto's Indonesia.

 

For that they will have to detract with nonsense claims. Check how many thread they created on a little story. That is the poison the represent and the reason Ramotar will go down as the most divisive and despicable president. He either stop this nasty campaigning, accept we are in a new era and seek to reconcile himself to the task of facilitating a new Guyana.

 

FM

The LCDS does not have a comprehensive renewable energy strategy. Its financing comes from one source, which international politics make unlikely. When we pointed these things out they called us neemakaram.

FM
Originally Posted by Tar_K:

The LCDS does not have a comprehensive renewable energy strategy. Its financing comes from one source, which international politics make unlikely. When we pointed these things out they called us neemakaram.

 To everyone in the world except the PPP, carbon Credits is dead. In the US it is even come to be a venal sin to mention the term. No one is picking up on this idea. China and India killed it. When t he US withdrew their 32 billion from the pool that was the end of it.

 

The forests are inherently valuable in themselves for more reasons than their ability to recycle carbon. They are valuable to us as cover, as flora and fauna rapidly becoming rare and they are helping us with flood control which we badly need.

FM

Most the carbon credits were broked by Lehman Bros in London. When they collapsed, CC as a financial instrument also went with them. China who is building coal plants at the rate of 1 per week has no interest in obeying the diktats of the EPA or anyone else.

Sunil

They dont HAVE to give one Jill to Guyanaas they promised AND Guyana does NOT have to listen to them. Mayaysia, India and other Countries can buy ALL the Greenheart and Wallaba available in Guyana.

Nehru

It is clear that that the PPP administration is unwilling to actively pursue any foreign funded project with high standards of accountability and transparency.

 

Yuh mean fuh seh dat if dey cant teef den dem not gon be  part ah it.

 

Guyanese Screwed

Hope more people wake up ans soon

Pointblank
Originally Posted by Nehru:

They dont HAVE to give one Jill to Guyanaas they promised AND Guyana does NOT have to listen to them. Mayaysia, India and other Countries can buy ALL the Greenheart and Wallaba available in Guyana.

---------

 

Oh what strategic brilliance. Those wallaba and greenheart will be around forever. 

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:

The LCDS does not have a comprehensive renewable energy strategy. Its financing comes from one source, which international politics make unlikely. When we pointed these things out they called us neemakaram.

 To everyone in the world except the PPP, carbon Credits is dead. In the US it is even come to be a venal sin to mention the term. No one is picking up on this idea. China and India killed it. When t he US withdrew their 32 billion from the pool that was the end of it.

 

The forests are inherently valuable in themselves for more reasons than their ability to recycle carbon. They are valuable to us as cover, as flora and fauna rapidly becoming rare and they are helping us with flood control which we badly need.

=======

 

It is true that China their new best friend killed it. India too. 

FM
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

It is clear that that the PPP administration is unwilling to actively pursue any foreign funded project with high standards of accountability and transparency.

 

Yuh mean fuh seh dat if dey cant teef den dem not gon be  part ah it.

 

Guyanese Screwed

Hope more people wake up ans soon


This makes no sense, you made an accustion against the ppp administration, but then  neglected to provide a clear understanding of what you are accusing them of... ...

FM
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

It is clear that that the PPP administration is unwilling to actively pursue any foreign funded project with high standards of accountability and transparency.

 

Yuh mean fuh seh dat if dey cant teef den dem not gon be  part ah it.

 

Guyanese Screwed

Hope more people wake up ans soon


This makes no sense, you made an accustion against the ppp administration, but then  neglected to provide a clear understanding of what you are accusing them of... ...


Bhai, Deh man name Pointblank, should I say more.

Nehru

"It is clear that that the PPP administration is unwilling to actively pursue any foreign funded project with high standards of accountability and transparency."


That was part of the article If you PPP Piss drinkers woud have read the article you would have seen it.


It seems that ypou PPP piss drinkers just post what you are told and would just read the replies to your posts and reBUTT

Pointblank
Why would the PPP not pursue foreign funded projects? The fact is that the PPP has been criticized for every single venture they proposed. If they proceed they get criticized, and if they don't, they get criticized. Time the majority opposition get some balls and start making political progress instead of wasting time whining and complaining. From all appearances, the majority opposition seem toothless.
FM
Originally Posted by Sunil:

Most the carbon credits were broked by Lehman Bros in London. When they collapsed, CC as a financial instrument also went with them. China who is building coal plants at the rate of 1 per week has no interest in obeying the diktats of the EPA or anyone else.

 

========

 

 

 

That was part of it too. In addition, the Chinese, Indians and Americans are opposed to a carbon market or carbon tax. Recently these three countries killed the proposed EU carbon tax on airlines. This was crucial because you need a tax or mandate before the market can develop. So essentially the UN's REDD scheme, on which the LCDS is dependent, is dead. The appetite is not there. As an old tree hugger, I know there are better ways to do this, protect the forests and still create industry.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×