ACP countries follow Ramotar’s lead - stand in solidarity with Bouterse against EU boycott

They( APC NATIONS)  can do what the hell they want but if Ramotar and his Party want to have a moral footing to complain of the PNC almost  then they better treat all dictators and usurpers alike or be accused of gross hypocrisy.

Bouterse killed many East Indians. No surprise the PPP is on bed with him.

Bouterse is linked to Indians who killed Indians.  Hague is the answer for him

I must agree that Bourtese has blood on his hands. And do does Granger. Send both off to international courts.

----

 

Hmmm...this is quite a subdued and measured response by our cyber non-onion/garlic/meat/fish eating Brahmin. I guess you would have been hollering and bawling if Khemraj or Raphael was in bed with the Indo killer Bourtese. You even tried to pull in Mr Granger to cover for your lame howl.

TK Your weakness is your inability to engage in a debate. Is this your best response ? No wonder you lecture at a second grade college. Let us engage in a meaningful debate, until then you continue to expose your weaknesses.

---

 

Hehe...this is at best lame...I got my message over. Oh BTW yuh remembuh de football match in Buxton when Bourtese son attended? Hehe...

Who did Granger kill? List the persons and the direct link connecting him and the murders.

 

Do you hear anyone calling Ramotar a murderer while all indications are he has to have been informed of that tacitly if not explicitly as to  what RK and Gajraj was doing?

I am yet to see you make a linear argument from premise to conclusion that is valid. 

 

You make scatter brained assertions  and launch caustic attacks on those assertions that is all. Why don't you show us in the form of a simple syllogism how conclude TK does not know to debate.

 

Above you have three grandiose generalizations and each of them standing on air and yet you insist you are debating.

 

Are you mad or simply stupid and cannot help yourself?

Ramotar is right to insist upon the principle of national sovereignty. If we let that principle go, world war is next on the agenda. It is more important to re-assert that principle than it is to pass judgement on the internal affairs of other nations, and it is certainly a more honourable position than to suck up to the colonial powers as some opposition parties are wont to do.

The honorable thing is to condemn dictators who use force to oppress their people.  Sovereignty is not sacrosanct. If it were we would not have so many wars across the globe.  Further, sovereignty means others recognize in principle that within national borders one can act within the parameters of the laws of the state. That was trampled on when he overthrew a government and instituted harsh murderous rule. Ramotar would not like the PNC overthrow his government, murder his cabinet,  gerrymander a majority and then absolve themselves of their sins in.

These parties are in bed with Bourtese, Granger and Green.  I say Bourtese, Granger and Green for the Hague.  Indian Killers look out Hague is watching you. 

Thank you for making my point. Although it was inadvertent, it was nonetheless the only constructive thing you have done in your 75-80 posts so far today, using your assorted accounts.

 

The concept of sovereignty originated with the Peace of Westphalia, and it was incorporated into the UN charter after the sobering experience of two world wars. It was intended to be sacrosanct. But sovereignty is the enemy of Empire. When Hitler annexed the Sudetenland, he proclaimed that he was doing so to defend ethnic Germans from a "dictator" who was "using force to oppress his people." 

The most recent assault on sovereignty is the so-called "Blair Doctrine," from Tony Blair's 1999 speech in Chicago where he asserted to right to violate sovereignty for "humanitarian" reasons. He's such a humanitarian.

this move by ramotar tell me that he is a ass,and is not thinkng about guyanese welfare.first the EU is footing the bill and they have the right to choose where they want to hold this conference,why support a man that is wanted for murder and cannot help guyana,the EU  can help guyana.ramotar and the ppp crime family might find themself in the same boat  soon  

 First of all, in a decade of posting I doubt even the most prolific of posters, Freaky, ever made 75 posts in a day. Today, I made under ten so that bull is your usual begging the question.

 

No formal system can ever be 100%, not even our best scientific system. Human systems seeking to control human emotions I am sure do not get high  efficiency rates either.There are too many peculiar people in the world...you notwithstanding. To say something is sacrosanct means  respect for a principle that is at its best only among rational actors.

 

Blair did not need to affirm what is already an logical expression of our humanity. As noted above, sovereignty is about autonomy under the law. No right to autonomy exist in instances of genocidal wars of attrition against another in the same or extra territorial space.

 

A sort of good Samaritan right succeeds that. I already quoted the second treatise on Locke about the right of assist another in distress exceeding the right of any person on any principle insisting for example,  a moral authority  to pull another person's finger nails. The necessity to bitch slap that MFer to hell exists as a superior moral imperative. No infraction to the sanctity of the principle of non injury to a another would be deemed to have occurred!

 

You are appealing to nonsensical rule making.  Sovereignty is not meant as a shield to hide murderers. And Malaysia is not authoritative in my book on the nature of  rights.

If we're talking about Tony Blair, I'm all for it.

Bourtese and Surinaam are a stratgic hedge of the PPP.

And what might that be? 

Use your grey, connect the dots.

----

 

Yuji...you seem envious of TK. 

Why should I be jealous ? He is the one who started to post mockery at me. Read up on this forum. I have no problems engaging in a debate but it is disgraceful for him to engage in personal attacks rather than debates.

Have the courage of your convictions and speak plainly you cowardly bum!

 

Most of us are not members of your special 'club' . . . we don't know the secret 'codes' to decrypt . . . 

What sort of lie are you fabricating again?

 

Show me one post where you made a linear argument from premise to conclusion and I will frame it in terms of predicate calculus to demonstrate how hopelessly pathetic what you call argumentation is.

 

You trive on muck raking, nonsensical generalization and bigoted assumptions. You are after all a Brahmin!