I noted that the excuse used to close my thread at https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/pp...an-assasinates-rival that there is no evidence to support the notion that it was a PPP hit. Screams coming out of a cell at the local police station seem to suggest otherwise. However, that's not the point.

My complaint centers around the fact that posters friendly to the AFC are disproportionally targeted in a concerted effort to silence them. I provide as evidence the thread at:

https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/th...-just-give-up-linden

May I point out that there is no evidence in that thread either to support the notion that the tourism minister is a goon or has given up on Linden. What it does state inside the article is that the development of Silica City is the Guyana Government’s vision of creating a new, sustainable city which would be located in the Hilly Sands area along the Soesdyke Highway, the main artery connecting Brazil and the Cheddi Jagan International Airport (CJIA), Guyana’s principal airport.

The attention grabbing headline to suggest otherwise has however been allowed to go unchallenged, thereby demonstrating an affirmative understanding that certain PPP friendly posters are allowed to pen factually incorrect headlines and statement.

In view of these inconsistencies with how this forum is managed I would like to know what criteria of judgement is used to oppress positive AFC messages, whilst adulterated and damn right hate motivated expressions against the AFC are allowed to permeate this forum. Please note that I am in no way suggesting that antiman and batty boys are not allowed to post PPP friendly comments. Their sexual preferences are entirely between them and their client the PPP. But fairness should be extended to everyone.