Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

PEEPING TOM: What therefore accounts for the decision of the AFC to move in this direction through the tabling of a no-confidence motion? Is this related to a power struggle within the AFC?
The AFC emerged as a party that window dresses on the ethnic question. It emerged with two main leaders, one of whom was of Indian descent and the other of African descent. In this way, it promoted itself as a multi-ethnic party.
Under its leadership formula, the African Guyanese was the presidential candidate for the 2006 elections and the Indian Guyanese was the candidate for the 2011 elections. This seemed to be the logical succession policy within the AFC.
The only problem was that in 2011, the AFC did well enough to hold the balance of power in parliament between APNU and the PPPC. And under its present leader, the AFC made major inroads into the PPPC strongholds in 2011.
But there may still be an expectation within the party that the Presidential candidate for any future elections would have to be someone who is a Guyanese of African descent. The AFC has given no signal as to who will succeed the present leader and carry the AFC into any future election.
Could it be that the reason why the AFC is keen to go to the polls is to ensure that the status quo in its present leadership is maintained, since it would now be too late for the party to field a new person as its presidential candidate?

 

 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Opposition parties say Gov’t worried over no-confidence motion

August 25, 2014 | By | Filed Under News 

 

…employs β€œdelay tactics”

With the possible vote of β€œno confidence” against the incumbent People’s Progressive Party (PPP) government lingering, Opposition parties say they feel that all will be done to delay the holding of General Elections.  They are convinced that the government will go out of its way to set back the polls, β€œas much as they have delayed Local Government Elections.”Parliament Former Foreign Affairs Minister and People’s National Congress member, Aubrey Norton told Kaieteur News yesterday that there are several scenarios to be considered when assessing the country’s political situation. As it stands, the PPP-government is facing a majority vote-out by opposition members who have already pledged no-confidence in their manner of governance. Norton believes that the PPP will be embarrassed that in Guyana’s short post-independence history, it will be the first party forced out of office. He thinks that β€œdelay tactics” will be employed by the government because ground response might not be in their favour. β€œThe PPP is right now testing the ground, and I don’t think they like the response.” He told the newspaper that since the party no longer has a grip on the Guyana Elections Commission, it must be considered that the government, β€œalthough there is no basis, would still turn to the law where they believe they have more backing, to challenge the motion.” He said that with the release of former Chief Elections Commissioner Gocool Boodoo, the PPP has no β€œinsider.” Also government’s claim that GECOM is not prepared to host elections is another delay tactic. Norton opined that the contradiction of information from government and GECOM β€œis another signal that the PPP is no longer in control after 28 years.” β€œThe PPP is worried. There is a no-confidence motion, and no question that it will be addressed.” The opposition parties are unfazed by suggestion of a snap election. β€œThe faster, the better, we just want them out!” was the response by Alliance for Change’s (AFC) General Secretary, David Patterson when asked about early polls. General Secretary of the PPP, Clement Rohee, and Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr Roger Luncheon have questioned the readiness of GECOM to hold any kind of elections. Rohee had stated that β€œthe PPP is not confident this has been done thoroughly so as to ensure that every eligible voter will be correctly placed on his or her constituency list.” Kaieteur News was told that the Presidential Secretary had also inquired of the Parliament whether the no-confidence motion was legal. Inquires were also made as to why the motion should have one line. However with the provision of research documents and examples from other countries, it was explained that the motion was properly and legally worded.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Conscience:

PEEPING TOM: What therefore accounts for the decision of the AFC to move in this direction through the tabling of a no-confidence motion? Is this related to a power struggle within the AFC?
The AFC emerged as a party that window dresses on the ethnic question. It emerged with two main leaders, one of whom was of Indian descent and the other of African descent. In this way, it promoted itself as a multi-ethnic party.
Under its leadership formula, the African Guyanese was the presidential candidate for the 2006 elections and the Indian Guyanese was the candidate for the 2011 elections. This seemed to be the logical succession policy within the AFC.
The only problem was that in 2011, the AFC did well enough to hold the balance of power in parliament between APNU and the PPPC. And under its present leader, the AFC made major inroads into the PPPC strongholds in 2011.
But there may still be an expectation within the party that the Presidential candidate for any future elections would have to be someone who is a Guyanese of African descent. The AFC has given no signal as to who will succeed the present leader and carry the AFC into any future election.
Could it be that the reason why the AFC is keen to go to the polls is to ensure that the status quo in its present leadership is maintained, since it would now be too late for the party to field a new person as its presidential candidate?

 

 

 

It would be in the best interest of the AFC to form a coalition with the PNC.

 

I want to see a real political fight between the combined opposition and the PPP. We must all respect the results of such an election.

 

Winner takes all.

 

 

FM
Last edited by Former Member

I am curious about what message the AFC will take the people at the next general elections. Are they going to say the PPP bad and the PNC is good?  If the PNC is bad then why were you backing them in parliament and on the streets?  If the PNC is good then why don't you merge with them and be one happy family?  The AFC will have a difficult time sending an acceptable campaign message to the people. I expect to see the AFC winning less than 3% of the votes which will reflect the alienation among its supporters currently

Billy Ram Balgobin

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×