Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

AFC to take legal action against senior

officers who engage in ‘illegal

spending’

May 1, 2014 | By | Filed Under News
 

Considering that the 2014 Appropriation Bill has not been assented to, Leader of the Alliance for Change, Khemraj Ramjattan, said that any spending from today will be deemed illegal.

President Donald Ramotar has not assented to the Appropriation Bill and the deadline ended last night.

Ramjattan also sent a strong warning to senior officials that if they are engaged in such spending, the AFC will move to the courts to seek jail sentences.

The AFC Leader at a press conference yesterday at the Side Walk CafÉ on Middle Street, reminded that given the assent of President Donald Ramotar, the Appropriation Bill would then legally authorize spending of all monies approved in the National Assembly during the budget debates.

The AFC Leader said, “To date we have not seen any assent to that amended Appropriation Bill and the very important point is that at 12:00 midnight if there (was) no assent to that Bill as amended by the Committee of Supply, Government could not do any legal spending.

“Any spending after that will be deemed illegal spending. Very many may not know but once the legislative authorization is given by Parliament by virtue of the Assembly’s passage and the assent of the President, then and only then there is any authorization for legal spending.

For the previous months, Article 219 of the Constitution provided four months of latitude from January to April for the authorization of the legal spending.

“We have reached the last day (yesterday). We have taken a look at the Official Gazette and the last one was April 26, but this was nothing about the assent to the Bill.”

When asked by this publication what action the opposition party is prepared to take if government moves forward with any such spending, Ramjattan said that the relevant ministers will be brought before the Committee of Privileges and Private Criminal Prosecution will be taken against senior officers.

He explained, “I have been doing research on this course of action and I will bring private criminal prosecution against senior officers that are going to sign off on the cheques to do spending.”

“Under the present law, the Minister of Finance, Dr. Ashni Singh, has sort of immunized himself from prosecution by not putting in the word ‘Minister of Finance’ in Section 85 of the Financial Management and Accountability Act.

“It only has Public Officer. We amended that section of the Act to include the Minister but that too has not been assented to by the President and so right now only officers would be breaching the law if they were to spend money unauthorized.”

The politician assured that action can be taken against those officers at the private level because they would be breaching the Constitution and the Financial Management and Accountability Act.

“I hope they all understand that the Minister and President have immunized themselves while they are left out to be slaughtered.”

The lawyer said that this is the first time he is witnessing such a case with regard to the Appropriation Bill.

When asked what he believes to be Government’s motive for not wanting to assent to the Bill, he said, “I want to know if they want to call elections. They are creating a situation that will not encourage legal spending and if they call a no confidence vote in the amended Bill and call elections then we will be ready. But they too may not be fully prepared for such a call.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Quote "

The AFC Leader said, “To date we have not seen any assent to that amended Appropriation Bill and the very important point is that at 12:00 midnight if there (was) no assent to that Bill as amended by the Committee of Supply, Government could not do any legal spending.

“Any spending after that will be deemed illegal spending."unquote

 

Send these scumbags to jail, that is where the deserved to be

FM

Following Mr Ramjattan's press conference yesterday, President Ramotar assented to the budget bill just minutes before the midnight deadline. Naturally, Mr Ramjattan cannot now, and will not, take any public official to court for spending from the treasury.

FM
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

Following Mr Ramjattan's press conference yesterday, President Ramotar assented to the budget bill just minutes before the midnight deadline. Naturally, Mr Ramjattan cannot now, and will not, take any public official to court for spending from the treasury.

Thanks Gilly, as of now the media has not yet shared that report re:

Ramotar refuses to sign 2014 ‘Budget’

Bill

May 1, 2014 | By | Filed Under News
 

President Donald Ramotar whose office has been in receipt of the Appropriation Act of 2014 from Parliament since Friday April 25, is yet to give his assent to the said Act.

 

This is according to the Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr. Roger Luncheon, who said that the President left the jurisdiction early on Monday morning for the activities of the CARCIOM Mexican summit in Mexico City “so no discourse has as yet taken place and the intentions of the President has not been gleaned over the weekend which essentially is when the Appropriations Bill has been with us.”

The Bill is necessary since it allows for money to be allocated by governing bodies and generally if it is not assented to it would mean that government would be unable to function, a problem which is usually solved by the holding of General Elections.

Luncheon, pronouncing on elections as a last resort, said, “I don’t believe that we face an either or proposition or situation. Among the options that are available, holding National Elections cannot be excluded but that is not the exclusive option.”

The combined opposition which has the Majority in Parliament has disapproved over $37 Billion from the 2014 Budget including projects from Office of the President; those disapprovals are reflected in the Appropriations Act.

According to Luncheon, expenditure as authorized by the constitution in the Appropriations Act comprises Current and Capital items. He said that the Appropriation Act “as amended to reflect the decisions made during the Committee of Supply by the majoritorian opposition did not provide approval in 10 instances.”

He said that it is to be noted that the one instance where the current expenditure was not approved was that of the Office of the President (OP) and that the Capital expenditure for the OP was one of the nine Capital expenditures that were not approved by the combined opposition.

This cutting of the Capital and Current Expenditures of the OP, according to Luncheon, has placed a “stranglehold” on programmes within the said office.

“Obviously the intention of the opposition of our Shiv Chandrapaul Drive premises is to have erected a ‘for rent’ sign because in the absence of current and capital flows we probably might be able to acquire revenue renting the facilities as we won’t be able to run a Ministry,” said Luncheon.

The other eight instances when capital expenditure was not approved during the committee of supply according to Luncheon, “indeed continues the 2012 and 2013 saga however, one important difference in 2014 is, we are not dealing with cuts and reduction in the expenditure approved by or during the Committee of Supply. The decisions here perhaps in accordance with the Chief Justice’s ruling are to essentially disapprove the entire expenditure.”

“So the current expenditure for the OP has been disapproved its zero in the Appropriations Act and the other eight instances Capital has been rendered zero no Appropriations,” said Luncheon.

According to Luncheon, “a situation like this cannot be entertained and one can hardly in the remaining months of the fiscal year 2014 see the government discharging its constitutional and statutory responsibilities fettered by the provisions in the Appropriation Act and reflect in the intentions of the majoritarian opposition.”

He said that one can anticipate that the “administration would have to undertake those interventions that are necessary to allow it to discharge its constitutional responsibilities and to do so within the meaning and within the exercise of the law of Guyana

FM
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

Following Mr Ramjattan's press conference yesterday, President Ramotar assented to the budget bill just minutes before the midnight deadline. Naturally, Mr Ramjattan cannot now, and will not, take any public official to court for spending from the treasury.

CORRECTION: Acting President Sam Hinds assented to the budget bill on behalf of President Ramotar.

STABROEK NEWS:

Prime Minister Samuel Hinds, performing the functions of President, yesterday signed into force the Appropriations Bill 2014 thereby legally authorizing the expenditure of public funds until the end of the year.

This was confirmed to Stabroek News last evening by National Assembly Clerk, Sherlock Isaacs who said that the signed Appropriations Act 2014 was sent back to the National Assembly, and now needed to go to the National Printers to be published in the Official Gazette.

Up to yesterday afternoon the bill, passed since April 16th, had not been signed, which lent to  …..To continue reading, login or subscribe now.

 

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:

Why is Ashni immune from prosecution for illegal spending?

If you like Jagedo to replaced Ashni that can be arranged. You have to take your pick, mitwah bhai.  

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:

Why is Ashni immune from prosecution for illegal spending?

If you like Jagedo to replaced Ashni that can be arranged. You have to take your pick, mitwah bhai.  

I pick Priyanka.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:

Why is Ashni immune from prosecution for illegal spending?

If you like Jagedo to replaced Ashni that can be arranged. You have to take your pick, mitwah bhai.  

I pick Priyanka.

 

Chopra ?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×