The death is announced of PROGRESS IN GUYANA age 20 years (1992-2012).
He was chopped to death on Wednesday April 25 by APNUAFC.
He was the son of successive PPP/C governments since 1992, Brother of national development, Father of the poor, Uncle of international recognition, Grandson of prudent management and stringent fiscal policies, relative of improved infrastructure, house lots, increased wages, better health care, improved water supply, women and children rights, employment, foreign investments, economic growth, democracy, better living standards, improved investment climate and improved quality of life.
Funeral service for PROGRESS IN GUYANA will take place on Thursday April 26.
The body will be at the parliament buildings from 13:00 hours, for a funeral service inside the chambers where Ramjattan and Granger will read the final rights, thence to the APNUAFC headquarters.
Burial will take place at Congress Place.
The APNU/AFC’s argument that the poor will benefit from a reduction of VAT is a blatant misrepresentation to the people of this country. VAT is non- discriminating it is applied to hair cuts as well as scissors; it is a tax on consumption that falls most heavily on those with the highest cost.
There is no way in which we can establish what are the correct rates, but the aim of encouraging optimum use of the national resources must be remembered and if it can be shown that a change in the tax system would lead to an increase in national income without reducing Government Revenue then it is, prima facie, a desirable change.
Furthermore as with many taxes a reduction in the rate is called for if only to eliminate the effects of inflation which results in the real burden of taxation growing as inflation proceeds, and which also brings into the tax net previously exempted.
The wage earners receiving $49, 500 per month benefits from Government expenditure on police, defense, subvention to agriculture, heath care, OLPF, communication, and subvention to GPL etc, even if he/ she pays no taxes.
Will money be better used to increase family allowances or to give greater subsidies to farmers, reducing the price of food and the need for family allowances? Is a reduction in taxation preferable to an increase in old age pensions or increased income tax threshold?
The Government is faced by these and hundreds of similar choices and must be answered with the certain knowledge that whatever the Government does it will be wrong, in the eyes of atleast half the population.
The AFC and APNU are clearly out of their league and are out of touch on issues pertaining to the economy and have miscalculated the ramification it would it incur on the unsuspecting thousands of working class families and corporations in which they so falsely claim to represent, should this irrationality and political posturing were allowed to prevail.
It is absolutely pellucid the opposition parties intent on killing this year budget in an attempt to appeal to their base voters to gain petty political points by demonizing government policies and initiatives.
What they fail to acknowledge is that by doing this it would result in the political suicide of these two flaccid non entities (APNU/ AFC) since it is the government of the day that is responsible for propelling our economy out of fiscal despair, and providing a rather predictable economic policy which is more pragmatic since it possess the rudiments that offers macroeconomic stability.
It therefore boggles the mind to conceive why the AFC/APNU who claims to represent the working class would propose the retrenching of hundreds of public servants that are employed at these ministries, are they acting in the best interest of these people or themselves.
If the AFC/APNU’s agenda is to target the government then AFC/APNU’s agenda is to hurt the people of Guyana. I believe that they are being too unrealistic and are on a course to deceive the people. Since reducing government spending would mean fewer money being pumped into the economy.