Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
AG wants Trotman sued for allowing APNU ‘Unconstitutional Bill’ : ….as PPP accuses Deputy Speaker Backer of parliamentary coup d’ÉtatPDFPrintE-mail
Written by Gary Eleazar   
Monday, 18 February 2013 21:07

ATTORNEY General and Minister of Legal Affairs, Anil Nandlall, is inviting any Guyanese to file a lawsuit against the Speaker of the National Assembly, Raphael Trotman, for allowing a constitutional bill to be approved with a simple majority in the House, even as the government accuses the Deputy Speaker, Deborah Backer, of attempting a coup d’État. Nandlall was at the time appearing at a  People’s Progressive Party (PPP) media briefing at Freedom House, along with Parliamentarian and Presidential Advisor on Governance, Gail Teixeira and Junior Finance Minister Bishop Juan Edghill, among others.
Any such lawsuit Nandlall concedes, will also have to name him as a defendant, given the  nature of his office as legal advisor to and representative of the state.
Nandlall told media operatives yesterday during the party’s press briefing that he has not decided on whether the government will approach the court for a further clarification.
The Constitutional (Amendment) Bill, introduced by A Partnership for National Unity’s (APNU’s), Carl Greenidge, seeks to amend the Constitution of Guyana and was approved last Thursday in the House, by a simple majority.
The Guyana Government maintains its position that such a move requires a two- thirds majority vote.
The Attorney General told media operatives that following the debate on Thursday last, he was approached by Alliance For Change (AFC) Leader, Khemraj Ramjattan and APNU’s second-in-command, Dr Rupert Roopnarine, who according to Nandlall, “encouraged me to have the matter ventilated in the court for a clarification.”
Nandlall said the opposition members “see substance in the arguments advanced.”
The government’s legal advisor, in reminding of his hesitancy to approach the court, deferred to the citizenry, saying that he is quite sure that there are many concerned Guyanese who are interested in the matter.
The Attorney General invited members of the public to file a lawsuit against the substantive Speaker, Trotman, “for allowing the Bill to go through.”
Expanding on his hesitancy to approach the courts, Nandlall suggested that it is the Opposition that is in doubt as to whether the Bill piloted by Greenidge, can in fact amend the Guyana Constitution with a simple majority
The enraged parliamentarians met with media operatives and complained bitterly also against the Opposition’s actions in the House, with Teixeira levelling the coup d’État claims against Backer.
According to the Presidential Advisor, Backer had been asked to hold the post for the Speaker in his absence for “two hours.”
It was during this time she purportedly overthrew a ruling by the substantive Speaker Raphael Trotman, when he allowed Home Affairs Minister, Clement Rohee, to make a statement to the House at its previous sitting.
“This is not to be taken lightly, basically it was a coup… there was a coup d’État in the Parliament by the deputy who was holding the seat.”
Teixeira called the actions by Backer “an indication of the bullyism and total disregard for norms and practice and more importantly, the decisions of the Speaker.”
The PPP Member of Parliament said too that the decision by Trotman was made following months of deliberations and consultations with legal minds across the Region and farther afield.
Calling last Thursday’s decision by Backer a “new dynamic to threaten of parliamentary democracy,” Teixeira said that Conventions and Standing Orders continue to be eroded undermining  Parliament in the process.
“Clearly the mood in Parliament and the behaviour on the floor does not give one much hope that the Opposition intends to change its approach and move from one-vote dictatorship.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Conscience:

In the event of any snap elections, the Guyanese populace will endorse the PPP/C with a majority, thus ensuring progress continues

In the older days, you woulda had that kinda dumbass statement on a stamp pad and used so much to try and make someone believe, the friggin thing woulda really been worn out quite fast.

cain

There will always be various views on elections, but the actual results on election day is the important one.

 

While there will also be differing expectations, it seems that the PPP/C will gain a majority at the next election.

FM

The Speaker of the National Assembly needs to take a more careful look at the constitution, which clearly states, in order to change any clause in the constitution a 2/3 majority is required, the speaker's decision to entertain and allow such  a motion  without a 2/3 majority, is indeed a grace cause of concern.

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

The Speaker of the National Assembly needs to take a more careful look at the constitution, which clearly states, in order to change any clause in the constitution a 2/3 majority is required, the speaker's decision to entertain and allow such  a motion  without a 2/3 majority, is indeed a grace cause of concern.

How long do you think the PPP can hide behind concepts as constitutionality and legitimacy in deference to morality and justice? The constitution is a document conceived in a dictatorship and grudgingly nourished under the guise of democracy to foster autocrats that rob us blind. That this document is referred to to give the PPP legitimacy is a reflection of their compulsive drive to capture the state as a prize rather than a chance to serve as honest men.

FM

The Speaker showed a total disregard for the Constitution of Guyana,and further showed his partisanship  by refusing to discipline the joint opposition members while they disrupt the democratically elected P.P.P/C members when they speak, instead the Speaker cowardly walk out the National Assembly

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

The Speaker showed a total disregard for the Constitution of Guyana,and further showed his partisanship  by refusing to discipline the joint opposition members while they disrupt the democratically elected P.P.P/C members when they speak, instead the Speaker cowardly walk out the National Assembly

 The constitution is an ankle weight. It weighs us down. It is apt for the opposition to highlight its inefficiencies. Again, legitimacy without a moral foundation to shoulder it is hallow. The idea that our legislature is a rubber stamp for the administration is an odium. The speaker is right to protest the ridiculous pretense that the legislature stands for anything except the formality of acceding to the PPP;s wishes.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×