Hinds used to write here. I do not care for Lewis ...he is a stark defender of the Burnham constitution...I do have prejudices!

D2 posted:

Hinds used to write here. I do not care for Lewis ...he is a stark defender of the Burnham constitution...I do have prejudices!

I am no fan of either

the contortions & shamelessness of loudmouth hypocrites here is what I am pointing to 

https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/ra...6#382978457545937266

before they soil themselves

Nehru and yuji22 need to keep their hands in their pockets

ronan posted:

D2 posted:

Hinds used to write here. I do not care for Lewis ...he is a stark defender of the Burnham constitution...I do have prejudices!

I am no fan of either

the contortions & shamelessness of loudmouth hypocrites here is what I am pointing to 

Most of these fellows here live in cultural caves of their own fabrication. They are prisoners of their own delusions.

I stand by what I stated, he only mentioned the Massacre of the Lindeners when PPP in Govt, why dont he tell us about the murder, RAPE and Arson of Indians in the 60's. He is definitely BIAS and has a Pro African leaning, which he is entitled to and I am free to point it out!!!

Now I know who you are. Redux, You are back to create trouble. 

Listen, I have ZERO sympathy for Hinds and Lewis, they will crawl back to the PNC on their bellies in no time.

Despite my negative opinion on them, no journalist should be treated as they are bring treated. I am a strong defender of freedom of expression and freedom of the press.

yuji22 posted:

Now I know who you are. Redux, You are back to create trouble. 

Listen, I have ZERO sympathy for Hinds and Lewis, they will crawl back to the PNC on their bellies in no time.

Despite my negative opinion on them, no journalist should be treated as they are bring treated. I am a strong defender of freedom of expression and freedom of the press.

lol

yuji22 posted:

Now I know who you are. Redux, You are back to create trouble. 

Listen, I have ZERO sympathy for Hinds and Lewis, they will crawl back to the PNC in no time.

Despite my negative opinion on them, no journalist should be treated as they are bring treated. I am a strong defender of freedom of expression.

Hinds was never PNC. You associate him with the party because of your own prejudices. The PNC jailed him. I dare you to find one article from him where he extolled the virtues of the PNC party. You cant but instead will go on mouthing the same lies because it is easier than actually seek after the truth of your words.

I did not here you utter one damn phrase against the PPP misuse of that news paper or the state assets to suffocate free speech. Misir had a whole army here being paid by the post to insult us and to post PPP agit prop. They were paid from NCN.

Someone hacked Shadood's computer and passed on all their data to us so we not only have times, payment vouchers but lengthy conversations between them as they took pride in their constant harassment of members of GN&I.

They all ran away when we began to address them by their real names. Worse, they were personally nasty to the young ladies they worked with. It was an insight of their contempt for women.

Go and search the board for the data. Most should be here as the PPP org called the New Media Strategy used state assets to try to shut down this board. The good thing was we did not know they were paid posters with a nine to five job to harass us and still whipped their backsides on our free time.

Nehru posted:

I stand by what I stated

no banna, I jus pull down yuh pants

lol

the ppp should have sell this papers a long time ago but they abuse it now the pnc will do the same back to the same old shit 

ronan posted:

Nehru posted:

I stand by what I stated

no banna, I jus pull down yuh pants

lol

Yuh does tek it in the ass? My pants do not go down for such action!!!!!!!!!

Nehru posted:

Yuh does tek it in the ass? My pants do not go down for such action!!!!!!!!!

so, that's where you want the conversation to go when shame too much

i'll leave you to the tender mercies of admin

Nehru jus playin shy.

ronan posted:

Nehru posted:

Yuh does tek it in the ass? My pants do not go down for such action!!!!!!!!!

so, that's where you want the conversation to go when shame too much

i'll leave you to the tender mercies of admin

So why will you pull my pants down???

cain posted:

Nehru jus playin shy.

I deal only with Fish that is pink inside Cain.

D2, what was Hinds’ affiliation prior to 1992?

Nehru posted:

ronan posted:

Nehru posted:

Yuh does tek it in the ass? My pants do not go down for such action!!!!!!!!!

so, that's where you want the conversation to go when shame too much

i'll leave you to the tender mercies of admin

So why will you pull my pants down???

you exposed and shame

pretending you doan understand the metaphor an' ting

we know you're stupid, but not THAT stupid

So you dont have shame, you like pull down man pants. To each his own but I do not put it there, go seek others!!!

Nehru posted:

you like pull down man pants. To each his own but I do not put it there

ahh g'waan dahside

you want engage in homo sex conversation to distract

nurse yuh shame in wan carna; nobody playing

Shame Shame Shame HAHA  You are a shameless man looking for other men.

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

ksazma posted:

D2, what was Hinds’ affiliation prior to 1992?

Always was and still is a member of the WPA.

seignet posted:

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

Whose comment has moved society in Guyana? All have remain like docile sheep to their shepherding party. 

If black people were marginalized ( and they were) he has a right to speak to it. Misir has a hundred page document replete with arcane statistics all purporting to show otherwise. But nowhere in that did he account for why in 23 years the PPP never had a black face representing us as ambassador abroad. 

Hinds has written extensively on constitutional reform. He has a detailed document on power-sharing as a temporary band-aid until we can get our act together and produce a document that is truly republican, whatever form that is to take. His proposal is the most sane document of all that we have seen given the long list of people from Dhanpal, Tara Singh, Ravi Dev etc who broached the subject. He argued from a point of inclusion not ethnic bifurcation.

ronan posted:

D2 posted:

Hinds used to write here. I do not care for Lewis ...he is a stark defender of the Burnham constitution...I do have prejudices!

I am no fan of either

the contortions & shamelessness of loudmouth hypocrites here is what I am pointing to 

Is Ronan and Warrior one and the same? Or did they graduate from the same grammar school?

D2 posted:

seignet posted:

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

Whose comment has moved society in Guyana? All have remain like docile sheep to their shepherding party. 

If black people were marginalized ( and they were) he has a right to speak to it. Misir has a hundred page document replete with arcane statistics all purporting to show otherwise. But nowhere in that did he account for why in 23 years the PPP never had a black face representing us as ambassador abroad. 

Hinds has written extensively on constitutional reform. He has a detailed document on power-sharing as a temporary band-aid until we can get our act together and produce a document that is truly republican, whatever form that is to take. His proposal is the most sane document of all that we have seen given the long list of people from Dhanpal, Tara Singh, Ravi Dev etc who broached the subject. He argued from a point of inclusion not ethnic bifurcation.

 

 

Dhanpaul and Tara Singh have not written on constitutional reform.  The most comprehensive document on this subject is by Ramkarran.  

Bibi Haniffa posted:

ronan posted:

D2 posted:

Hinds used to write here. I do not care for Lewis ...he is a stark defender of the Burnham constitution...I do have prejudices!

I am no fan of either

the contortions & shamelessness of loudmouth hypocrites here is what I am pointing to 

Is Ronan and Warrior one and the same? Or did they graduate from the same grammar school?

you have a problem with my grammar?

fyi, there is a reason i used an ampersand instead of "and"

you're out of your league here

go dance with Nehru and dem

Hey hey hey...glad to see abie bai come back as Ronan. He sharp as ever. 

D2 posted:

ksazma posted:

D2, what was Hinds’ affiliation prior to 1992?

Always was and still is a member of the WPA.

Thanks.

Labba posted:

Hey hey hey...glad to see abie bai come back as Ronan. He sharp as ever. 

RAWAN.

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

seignet posted:

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

Whose comment has moved society in Guyana? All have remain like docile sheep to their shepherding party. 

If black people were marginalized ( and they were) he has a right to speak to it. Misir has a hundred page document replete with arcane statistics all purporting to show otherwise. But nowhere in that did he account for why in 23 years the PPP never had a black face representing us as ambassador abroad. 

Hinds has written extensively on constitutional reform. He has a detailed document on power-sharing as a temporary band-aid until we can get our act together and produce a document that is truly republican, whatever form that is to take. His proposal is the most sane document of all that we have seen given the long list of people from Dhanpal, Tara Singh, Ravi Dev etc who broached the subject. He argued from a point of inclusion not ethnic bifurcation.

 

 

Dhanpaul and Tara Singh have not written on constitutional reform.  The most comprehensive document on this subject is by Ramkarran.  

If you do not know do not broadcast your ignorance with such alacrity. I have Dhanpaul and Tara Singh's treatment on power sharing on my book shelf. Ask around for a copy. My friend Gary Girdhari of the Guyana Journal may be able to lay his hand on one.  I have also heard them speak on reforn many times on this forum

Ramkarran has presented no scholarship work on our constitution. If you need to see an detailed explanation as to where sahab et al doomed us to slavery you have to read what people like Batoram, Prackash, Ravi Dev, Hinds, Tarron said of it. They all advised abandoning the Burnham constitution.

Even Safraz who created this site did a greater job expressing our constitutional failure and what should change than Ramkarran. He presented it at a forum in NY and posted the text here. I believe Dhanpal and Hinds presented at the same time if memory served me right. Then there VJ who posted here also did a detailed presentation to the constitutional commission. Dove had an entire site dedicated to constitution reform. I wrote my piece.  As I said, Ramkarran did not do squat.

D2 posted:

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

seignet posted:

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

Whose comment has moved society in Guyana? All have remain like docile sheep to their shepherding party. 

If black people were marginalized ( and they were) he has a right to speak to it. Misir has a hundred page document replete with arcane statistics all purporting to show otherwise. But nowhere in that did he account for why in 23 years the PPP never had a black face representing us as ambassador abroad. 

Hinds has written extensively on constitutional reform. He has a detailed document on power-sharing as a temporary band-aid until we can get our act together and produce a document that is truly republican, whatever form that is to take. His proposal is the most sane document of all that we have seen given the long list of people from Dhanpal, Tara Singh, Ravi Dev etc who broached the subject. He argued from a point of inclusion not ethnic bifurcation.

 

 

Dhanpaul and Tara Singh have not written on constitutional reform.  The most comprehensive document on this subject is by Ramkarran.  

If you do not know do not broadcast your ignorance with such alacrity. I have Dhanpaul and Tara Singh's treatment on power sharing on my book shelf. Ask around for a copy. My friend Gary Girdhari of the Guyana Journal may be able to lay his hand on one.  I have also heard them speak on reforn many times on this forum

Ramkarran has presented no scholarship work on our constitution. If you need to see an detailed explanation as to where sahab et al doomed us to slavery you have to read what people like Batoram, Prackash, Ravi Dev, Hinds, Tarron said of it. They all advised abandoning the Burnham constitution.

Even Safraz who created this site did a greater job expressing our constitutional failure and what should change than Ramkarran. He presented it at a forum in NY and posted the text here. I believe Dhanpal and Hinds presented at the same time if memory served me right. Then there VJ who posted here also did a detailed presentation to the constitutional commission. Dove had an entire site dedicated to constitution reform. I wrote my piece.  As I said, Ramkarran did not do squat.

Neither Dhanpaul nor Tara Singh have ever published on constitutional reform.  All of Ramkarran's writings on the Guyana constitution is available on the web.  

Bibi Haniffa posted:

Neither Dhanpaul nor Tara Singh have ever published on constitutional reform.  All of Ramkarran's writings on the Guyana constitution is available on the web.  

This is the cover of their little pamphlet on powesharing. Ramkarran comments on what others write. He never endeavored to analyze our constitutional failings and offer a framework for reform. In that respect he is like Lincoln Lewis...commenting

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

seignet posted:

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

Whose comment has moved society in Guyana? All have remain like docile sheep to their shepherding party. 

If black people were marginalized ( and they were) he has a right to speak to it. Misir has a hundred page document replete with arcane statistics all purporting to show otherwise. But nowhere in that did he account for why in 23 years the PPP never had a black face representing us as ambassador abroad. 

Hinds has written extensively on constitutional reform. He has a detailed document on power-sharing as a temporary band-aid until we can get our act together and produce a document that is truly republican, whatever form that is to take. His proposal is the most sane document of all that we have seen given the long list of people from Dhanpal, Tara Singh, Ravi Dev etc who broached the subject. He argued from a point of inclusion not ethnic bifurcation.

 

 

Dhanpaul and Tara Singh have not written on constitutional reform.  The most comprehensive document on this subject is by Ramkarran.  

If you do not know do not broadcast your ignorance with such alacrity. I have Dhanpaul and Tara Singh's treatment on power sharing on my book shelf. Ask around for a copy. My friend Gary Girdhari of the Guyana Journal may be able to lay his hand on one.  I have also heard them speak on reforn many times on this forum

Ramkarran has presented no scholarship work on our constitution. If you need to see an detailed explanation as to where sahab et al doomed us to slavery you have to read what people like Batoram, Prackash, Ravi Dev, Hinds, Tarron said of it. They all advised abandoning the Burnham constitution.

Even Safraz who created this site did a greater job expressing our constitutional failure and what should change than Ramkarran. He presented it at a forum in NY and posted the text here. I believe Dhanpal and Hinds presented at the same time if memory served me right. Then there VJ who posted here also did a detailed presentation to the constitutional commission. Dove had an entire site dedicated to constitution reform. I wrote my piece.  As I said, Ramkarran did not do squat.

Neither Dhanpaul nor Tara Singh have ever published on constitutional reform.  All of Ramkarran's writings on the Guyana constitution is available on the web.  

Gurl dem people do dem writing before de wurl wide web. Baytoram write a total new constitution. Yuh na go find that online. 

Labba posted:

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

seignet posted:

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

Whose comment has moved society in Guyana? All have remain like docile sheep to their shepherding party. 

If black people were marginalized ( and they were) he has a right to speak to it. Misir has a hundred page document replete with arcane statistics all purporting to show otherwise. But nowhere in that did he account for why in 23 years the PPP never had a black face representing us as ambassador abroad. 

Hinds has written extensively on constitutional reform. He has a detailed document on power-sharing as a temporary band-aid until we can get our act together and produce a document that is truly republican, whatever form that is to take. His proposal is the most sane document of all that we have seen given the long list of people from Dhanpal, Tara Singh, Ravi Dev etc who broached the subject. He argued from a point of inclusion not ethnic bifurcation.

 

 

Dhanpaul and Tara Singh have not written on constitutional reform.  The most comprehensive document on this subject is by Ramkarran.  

If you do not know do not broadcast your ignorance with such alacrity. I have Dhanpaul and Tara Singh's treatment on power sharing on my book shelf. Ask around for a copy. My friend Gary Girdhari of the Guyana Journal may be able to lay his hand on one.  I have also heard them speak on reforn many times on this forum

Ramkarran has presented no scholarship work on our constitution. If you need to see an detailed explanation as to where sahab et al doomed us to slavery you have to read what people like Batoram, Prackash, Ravi Dev, Hinds, Tarron said of it. They all advised abandoning the Burnham constitution.

Even Safraz who created this site did a greater job expressing our constitutional failure and what should change than Ramkarran. He presented it at a forum in NY and posted the text here. I believe Dhanpal and Hinds presented at the same time if memory served me right. Then there VJ who posted here also did a detailed presentation to the constitutional commission. Dove had an entire site dedicated to constitution reform. I wrote my piece.  As I said, Ramkarran did not do squat.

Neither Dhanpaul nor Tara Singh have ever published on constitutional reform.  All of Ramkarran's writings on the Guyana constitution is available on the web.  

Gurl dem people do dem writing before de wurl wide web. Baytoram write a total new constitution. Yuh na go find that online. 

I can find his replacement constitution...actually it is a collaboration with others. Will post it.

D2 posted:

Labba posted:

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

Bibi Haniffa posted:

D2 posted:

seignet posted:

Politically, Hinds has no where to go. His comments never moved society, and on what he wrote about were on Black ppl marginalization, be it by Burnham, the Jagans, Jagdeo and Ramotar. In coalition, he had nothing to offer, Granger has no ears for him.

From Hinds own written words, it would be difficult for him to be home in any political movement.

Whose comment has moved society in Guyana? All have remain like docile sheep to their shepherding party. 

If black people were marginalized ( and they were) he has a right to speak to it. Misir has a hundred page document replete with arcane statistics all purporting to show otherwise. But nowhere in that did he account for why in 23 years the PPP never had a black face representing us as ambassador abroad. 

Hinds has written extensively on constitutional reform. He has a detailed document on power-sharing as a temporary band-aid until we can get our act together and produce a document that is truly republican, whatever form that is to take. His proposal is the most sane document of all that we have seen given the long list of people from Dhanpal, Tara Singh, Ravi Dev etc who broached the subject. He argued from a point of inclusion not ethnic bifurcation.

 

 

Dhanpaul and Tara Singh have not written on constitutional reform.  The most comprehensive document on this subject is by Ramkarran.  

If you do not know do not broadcast your ignorance with such alacrity. I have Dhanpaul and Tara Singh's treatment on power sharing on my book shelf. Ask around for a copy. My friend Gary Girdhari of the Guyana Journal may be able to lay his hand on one.  I have also heard them speak on reforn many times on this forum

Ramkarran has presented no scholarship work on our constitution. If you need to see an detailed explanation as to where sahab et al doomed us to slavery you have to read what people like Batoram, Prackash, Ravi Dev, Hinds, Tarron said of it. They all advised abandoning the Burnham constitution.

Even Safraz who created this site did a greater job expressing our constitutional failure and what should change than Ramkarran. He presented it at a forum in NY and posted the text here. I believe Dhanpal and Hinds presented at the same time if memory served me right. Then there VJ who posted here also did a detailed presentation to the constitutional commission. Dove had an entire site dedicated to constitution reform. I wrote my piece.  As I said, Ramkarran did not do squat.

Neither Dhanpaul nor Tara Singh have ever published on constitutional reform.  All of Ramkarran's writings on the Guyana constitution is available on the web.  

Gurl dem people do dem writing before de wurl wide web. Baytoram write a total new constitution. Yuh na go find that online. 

I can find his replacement constitution...actually it is a collaboration with others. Will post it.

Yea other peoppkle write it with Baytoram. Ravi and dem other bais put in dey piece. 

Chronicle Board of Directors will meet on Tuesday to pronounce on Hinds and Lewis. I hope they overrule Nigel's prohibition. Personally, I have decent respect for Hinds' and Lewis' opinions. They're not wild political columnists.

They should be allowed to have their Articles printed!!

Columnists, for every generation they come, writing exactly the samethings. Yet, the country is drunk with ethnic insecurities.

Do these pundits serve any purpose? They have no influence in the poliical thinking of Guyana.