Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Silly man, thee are rules of propriety on discussions and one of the worse habits is spamming. If Amral does not care then some 15 years of tradition for this board in recognizing well established rules would be lost. Spamming does not get a message across. It is the limp brained strategy to force feed what cannot on its own sustain a discussion. This is a discussion board.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?

Storm wants to take some heat off the corrupt AFC.  Do not suppress free speech.

Spamming is not free speech. This is a discussion board.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?

Storm wants to take some heat off the corrupt AFC.  Do not suppress free speech.

FM
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

 Do you think it is a complaint to address an in fraction that destroys the ambiance of the board?  I could well take the tact you did and say something quite nasty to you but that would only sink to your level. Being a knuckle walker you would not understand decorum. Assuming you are speaking to a woman or an effeminate man apparently give you intellectual ( and most likely) weaklings the only hard on you can get otherwise.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

 Do you think it is a complaint to address an in fraction that destroys the ambiance of the board?  I could well take the tact you did and say something quite nasty to you but that would only sink to your level. Being a knuckle walker you would not understand decorum. Assuming you are speaking to a woman or an effeminate man apparently give you intellectual ( and most likely) weaklings the only hard on you can get otherwise.

Sissy

 

AFC mouthpiece and defender of AFC corruption. Why dont you go help your friend in jail ?

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

Sissy is an understatement.

Do you think women or gay men are stupid? Even if I were gay, process for orderly transmission of information would be the same. In addressing what is clearly an infraction of the rules you have no other retort rather than as you did, inane and stupid.

 

That by the way is a is clearly a knowable proposition than the ignorant appeal to the emotion  ( your own) to posit homosexuality.  I can however affirm that  even as morons you recognize gay people have superior modes of behavior! 

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

 Do you think it is a complaint to address an in fraction that destroys the ambiance of the board?  I could well take the tact you did and say something quite nasty to you but that would only sink to your level. Being a knuckle walker you would not understand decorum. Assuming you are speaking to a woman or an effeminate man apparently give you intellectual ( and most likely) weaklings the only hard on you can get otherwise.

Sissy

 

AFC mouthpiece and defender of AFC corruption. Why dont you go help your friend in jail ?

Were you not of the stupid I would ask you send your daughter to test the proposition. But prudence would require avoidance of the moronic gene pool.

 

He would need my help or he would be my friend if  you were smart.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

Sissy is an understatement.

Do you think women or gay men are stupid? Even if I were gay, process for orderly transmission of information would be the same. In addressing what is clearly an infraction of the rules you have no other retort rather than as you did, inane and stupid.

 

That by the way is a is clearly a knowable proposition than the ignorant appeal to the emotion  ( your own) to posit homosexuality.  I can however affirm that  even as morons you recognize gay people have superior modes of behavior! 

To understand you correctly, you are saying that you are Gay ?

 

It is ok, we have nothing against Gays, we do not tolerate Alliance for Fraud and Crooks.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

Sissy is an understatement.

Do you think women or gay men are stupid? Even if I were gay, process for orderly transmission of information would be the same. In addressing what is clearly an infraction of the rules you have no other retort rather than as you did, inane and stupid.

 

That by the way is a is clearly a knowable proposition than the ignorant appeal to the emotion  ( your own) to posit homosexuality.  I can however affirm that  even as morons you recognize gay people have superior modes of behavior! 

To understand you correctly, you are saying that you are Gay ?

 

It is ok, we have nothing against Gays, we do not tolerate Alliance for Fraud and Crooks.

Understanding for you is clearly a long drawn our process. Read slowly, digest the words and assimilate the context....maybe then understanding.I am sorry to say I do not see that moment ever arriving.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

Sissy is an understatement.

Do you think women or gay men are stupid? Even if I were gay, process for orderly transmission of information would be the same. In addressing what is clearly an infraction of the rules you have no other retort rather than as you did, inane and stupid.

 

That by the way is a is clearly a knowable proposition than the ignorant appeal to the emotion  ( your own) to posit homosexuality.  I can however affirm that  even as morons you recognize gay people have superior modes of behavior! 

To understand you correctly, you are saying that you are Gay ?

 

It is ok, we have nothing against Gays, we do not tolerate Alliance for Fraud and Crooks.

Understanding for you is clearly a long drawn our process. Read slowly, digest the words and assimilate the context....maybe then understanding.

OK, now I understand that you are Gay. It is ok. We can still have a debate.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

Sissy is an understatement.

Do you think women or gay men are stupid? Even if I were gay, process for orderly transmission of information would be the same. In addressing what is clearly an infraction of the rules you have no other retort rather than as you did, inane and stupid.

 

That by the way is a is clearly a knowable proposition than the ignorant appeal to the emotion  ( your own) to posit homosexuality.  I can however affirm that  even as morons you recognize gay people have superior modes of behavior! 

To understand you correctly, you are saying that you are Gay ?

 

It is ok, we have nothing against Gays, we do not tolerate Alliance for Fraud and Crooks.

Understanding for you is clearly a long drawn our process. Read slowly, digest the words and assimilate the context....maybe then understanding.

OK, now I understand that you are Gay. It is ok. We can still have a debate.

 You do understand...in a manner of speaking my neighbor pet rabbit does understand.

 

Spelling the word "debate"  correctly does not mean you can proceed from premise to conclusion. That is too much of a stretch.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

Sissy is an understatement.

Do you think women or gay men are stupid? Even if I were gay, process for orderly transmission of information would be the same. In addressing what is clearly an infraction of the rules you have no other retort rather than as you did, inane and stupid.

 

That by the way is a is clearly a knowable proposition than the ignorant appeal to the emotion  ( your own) to posit homosexuality.  I can however affirm that  even as morons you recognize gay people have superior modes of behavior! 

To understand you correctly, you are saying that you are Gay ?

 

It is ok, we have nothing against Gays, we do not tolerate Alliance for Fraud and Crooks.

Understanding for you is clearly a long drawn our process. Read slowly, digest the words and assimilate the context....maybe then understanding.

OK, now I understand that you are Gay. It is ok. We can still have a debate.

 You do understand...in a manner of speaking my neighbor pet rabbit does understand.

 

Spelling the word "debate"  correctly does not mean you can proceed from premise to conclusion. That is too much of a stretch.

Can you please loan us your spell check ?

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by criminal#1:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Note Albert created a thread with a post then proceeded to post it on three more to this point. Why is that allowed or rather, since when is that allowed?


d2 love to complaint like a little sissy boy.

Sissy is an understatement.

Do you think women or gay men are stupid? Even if I were gay, process for orderly transmission of information would be the same. In addressing what is clearly an infraction of the rules you have no other retort rather than as you did, inane and stupid.

 

That by the way is a is clearly a knowable proposition than the ignorant appeal to the emotion  ( your own) to posit homosexuality.  I can however affirm that  even as morons you recognize gay people have superior modes of behavior! 

To understand you correctly, you are saying that you are Gay ?

 

It is ok, we have nothing against Gays, we do not tolerate Alliance for Fraud and Crooks.

Understanding for you is clearly a long drawn our process. Read slowly, digest the words and assimilate the context....maybe then understanding.

OK, now I understand that you are Gay. It is ok. We can still have a debate.

 You do understand...in a manner of speaking my neighbor pet rabbit does understand.

 

Spelling the word "debate"  correctly does not mean you can proceed from premise to conclusion. That is too much of a stretch.

Can you please loan us your spell check ? It is ok for you to admit that you are gay. We will not hold that against you.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Can you please loan us your spell check ? It is ok for you to admit that you are gay. We will not hold that against you.

 You would be better served in the company of 5 year olds, who of course would be promptly diss appointed you  need more prodding than usual to play the game right.  The aggregate you refer to as "we" would be quite pressed to hold anything if that means being able to appropriately judge right from wrong actions. You type cast them.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by cain:

Yuji, you start acting like a patacake again, why Yuji, why?

Ok OK bud. I will tone it down. Storm also needs to tone down a bit.  Things do get heated in political discussion forum.

 

Dont get me wrong, I do not support theft or corruption be it PPP, AFC or PNC.

You support spamming by the PPP posters.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by cain:

Yuji, you start acting like a patacake again, why Yuji, why?

Ok OK bud. I will tone it down. Storm also needs to tone down a bit.  Things do get heated in political discussion forum.

 

Dont get me wrong, I do not support theft or corruption be it PPP, AFC or PNC.

You support spamming by the PPP posters.

Mitwah, you cry like a baby when the AFC is in a croner. Listen, theft and corruption in the AFC should also be condemned.

 

Even Gerhard has called for an investigation while others here try to defend theft and corruption in the AFC.

 

I will keep my eyes open for spammers AFC, PPP or PNC and call it out when I see it.

 

FM
Originally Posted by albert:
Originally Posted by Amral:

spamming is never accepted on the BB. If he continues with this, we will need to remove him from the board for awhile. Lets hope he cleans up his act, keep me posted

ASK D2 TO POINT OUT WHERE I HAVE DONE AS SUCH?

Albert,


D2 cries like a sissy when the AFC is in trouble. He throws a punch but cannot take one back so he claims foul because of his weakness and trying to be a bully on this forum.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×