Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
Welcome to Colonialism 2.0

By Rakesh Krishnan Simha

August 29, 2011 "Information Clearing House" -- The assault on Libya by a coalition of mostly Western nations begs the question: Is colonialism making some sort of a comeback? While their economies are collapsing in slow motion, it is hard to picture Western countries prospecting for real estate across the globe, as they did 300 years ago. But as unreal as it seems, it is happening.

Few will shed tears for Gaddafi because it was his impetuosity that cost Libya its freedom; of more concern is the fact that after 40 years the country's considerable oil wealth has reverted to Western control. Iraqi oil too is flowing west. Iran could very well be the next target of American and British warplanes.

Ironically, it is when the West is weak that the emergent nations of Asia and Africa have reason to worry. Colonialism 2.0 isn't just a catchphrase; it is simple economics: the wealthy will always need to be vigilant against the desperate.

In the 18th and 19th centuries when the world was being colonized by the likes of Spain, Britain, France, Belgium, Portugal and the Dutch, India and China were the two richest countries in the world, together accounting for over 50 per cent of world GDP. And yet the two giant Asian nations ended up under colonial jackboots.

If you think colonization happened when the East was decadent and the West was rising or that India and China neglected their militaries and ignored the foreign threats lurking at their shores, you couldn't be more wrong. Both countries had very powerful armies and naval flotillas led by able commanders.

Military edge
In the early 1700's, India's legendary Admiral of the Fleet, Kanhoji Angre, routed the British, Dutch and Portuguese navies on the high seas. For 33 years until his death in 1729, the Indian remained undefeated. The British were so pissed they called him a pirate.
Indian ships of that time were so advanced in design and durability that the British inducted them into their fleet. In the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805, Horatio Nelson's flagship HMS Victory was an Indian built vessel.

According to the Indian Navy's website, "This so agitated British shipbuilders on the River Thames that they protested against the use of Indian built ships to carry trade from England. Consequently, active measures were adopted to cripple the Indian shipbuilding industries."


The southern Indian kingdom of Mysore was the first in modern history to use rockets in war, and they used it with deadly effect against the British in the Battle of Guntur in 1780. The literally shell-shocked British army fled from the battlefield. A few unexploded rockets were later shipped to the Royal Arsenal in London, where William Congreve, the British weapons expert, reverse engineered them to launch modern rocketry in Europe.

Most Indian rulers also possessed keen geopolitical awareness. For instance, they did not allow European merchants to keep garrisons or conduct inland trade. When Thomas Roe, the British monarch's emissary, landed in western India in 1616, he was made to wait a year before the Indian emperor granted him an audience. Three years later, Roe despite many entreaties and considerable bowing before the grandees at Delhi, returned without a trade treaty because the emperor saw no point in trading with a country that had not one product or commodity to offer India.

Thin end of the wedge
However, one slip-up by a weak emperor let in the hordes. A hundred years after Roe's exit, an English embassy had a stroke of luck when one of its members, William Hamilton, a physician of questionable medical skills, managed to relieve the figurehead emperor of severe pain in his groin. The emperor gratefully signed a decree giving the British inland trading rights, customs duty exemptions, and the right to keep a garrison. The rest as they say is history.

According to professor Rajesh Kochhar, emeritus scientist at the Indian Institute of Science Education & Research, Chandigarh, "These exemptions gave the English traders commercial advantages not only over other European companies but also over Indian traders. More importantly, the various official orders granting trade concessions gave the British a cause to defend, with military strength if needed." Does that sound familiar?

Return of the East
Today, the east is rising once again. Economists are stunned by the unprecedented flow of manufacturing, finance and wealth to the east. Magid Igbaria, former professor of management information systems at Tel Aviv University, wrote in The Virtual Workplace: "For all but the last 500 years of human history, the world's wealth measured in human capital and in goods was concentrated in Asia. During the past five centuries, the world's wealth has been concentrated in the West. This era is coming to an end. Today, the great concentrations of human capital, financial power, manufacturing power, and informated power are once again accumulating in the East."

Indeed, in 30 years India is predicted to overtake the US, even though it is only one-fourteenth the size of the US economy now. That is an incredible rate of wealth accretion.
The question is will the US and Europe simply watch the world go past? On the contrary, there is a concerted effort by a US-led coalition to stop this trend. Here are a few ways the West is trying to stay on top:

Base instincts: Today the US-led coalition has over 750 military bases across the globe. Despite the huge costs, this extension of military power is essential to their hegemony. A slew of European nationalities has followed the American military in its misadventures around the world. No empire in history has attempted such sweeping control. In Pliny's days the Roman, Indian and Chinese empires co-existed in their spheres of influence and never attempted to destabilise each other. The good old days.

Divide and rule: The Americans are playing up India as a major "regional" power allied with the West. This is not only insulting to the Indians (why should India only be a regional power?), it also scares the hell out of the Chinese. The communists in Beijing, therefore, come out with kneejerk statements calling for India's breakup, which in turn makes the Indians consider China a natural enemy. Amazingly, in the past 2500 years, China and India never had even a skirmish, until the British arrived on the scene and planted the seeds of border problems.

Climate bogey: After polluting the environment for more than a century, the West now wants India and China to reduce emissions. It's a thinly disguised attempt to slow these rapidly growing economies. India's Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh has done an about turn and now his views seem to align with Western interests, which led to key Indian negotiators quitting in disgust. Newsweek, the Pentagon mouthpiece masquerading as journalism, was sufficiently pleased with Ramesh to label him the "global rock star of climate change".

Dollar gambit: Wouldn't you feel almighty if you obtained a license to print US dollars off your home printer? While the rest of the world has to earn a living the hard way, the Americans just print dollars to pay their bills. Need a few hundred billion dollars to pay for the war in Iraq? Want to buy Venezuelan oil? Russian titanium? No problem. The US mint cranks the lever and billions of dollars start rolling off the presses. In fact, in recent years even that pretense has been given the heave-ho - now trillions of dollars are generated electronically in the accounts of the US Federal Reserves. It's as simple as that.

There is another way the dollar trade works against the interests of non-Western countries. Countries like China and Russia invest their earnings in US treasury bonds; these dollars are used by the Americans to maintain their global military supremacy, build increasingly modern weapons, and reward their allies with cash, weapons, and security umbrellas.

WTO: Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has called it "archaic, undemocratic and inflexible" and dominated by a small group of developed countries which indulge in protectionism. One of its aims is to pry open the agricultural markets of Asia, including India. Incidentally, India has the highest number of farmer suicides in the world.

Nixing nuclear tech: The 11th commandment: Thou shall not acquire nuclear technology. Indian and Japanese nuclear scientists perfected the fast breeder reactor (which generates more nuclear fuel than it uses) so they never have to look outside for hard-to-get uranium). However, most likely under US pressure, both nations have quietly shelved their technologies.

Space crunch: America's space ambitions are currently grounded because of deep cuts. India has the world's largest number (177) of satellites in space. NASA is aware of it; it is looking at joint ventures with the Indian Space Research Organisation which has reliable rockets and something like 20,000 engineers and scientists. Few are aware that during the 1990s, India requested the Russians for a role in the International Space Station, but the Americans said no. Now NASA wants a free ride on Indian rockets, and India's feckless politicians are happy to oblige.

General Manuel Noriega was once upon a time in Panama, the CIA's most valuable asset, doing their dirty work: drug trafficking, racketeering, money laundering, murdering. However, the Agency wanted total control of Panama and so in 1989 the US invaded the country, and accused him of doing precisely what they had ordered him to do. While serving a 20-year sentence in an American prison, Noriega wrote this memorable line: "If there is someone willing to buy a country, there is someone willing to sell it." For many countries in the East, their biggest worry is like Noriega there are plenty of collaborators in high places willing to sell their country for a few million dollars wired into a Swiss bank, along with US green cards for their families.

In the first era of colonialism, the then dominant Eastern nations opened up their economies and territories to comparatively backward Western nations over a span of several decades, finally ending up as their colonies. Under the guise of globalization and 'free' trade, Colonialism 2.0 could happen in much the same way.
Rakesh Krishnan Simha is New Zealand-based writer.

This item was first post at http://www.opednews.com

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This writer Simha has some good points. Nevertheless, what he fails to realize is this. India survives today as a country because of the West and Russia. Without the west and Russia, India will fall apart from the religious hate and racial illusion (most Pakistanis falsely belive that they are Arabs) and the racial hate of China.


The Chinese invasion of India in 1959 was only haulted because both the United States and the Soviet Union put their militaries on standby for an attack on China. So without the West this writer would not be able to write his article.
FM
Well, in all due respect to Mr Simha, though some of what he wrote may be historical facts, his illustration of how it is today and what will happen is a bit dreamy and overly hopeful. India, given it's critical mass and certain technical skills, will always be a noticable force in Geo politics and business. However, like many speeches I attended while there, this over-rates the current situation and near-term potential. The society is still engrossed with creed, caste, class and religious differences.

I never saw and felt the drive to be ahead of the curve, but a people very satisfied proving they can do...also. India, for a very long time will, at best, be a second rate nation and trailing China. China's cultural revolution did a great job of removing the historical vices which still be-set India today.

India seemed to have lost it's way after the post-independence thrust where it saw itself ahead of China in almost every quadrant. China did the hard work of investing in it's people just to see a literacy rate at some 90% while India still sits at 50%. The Chinese workforce is set to take the nation into the 21st century while in India people still set themselves on fire when the Govt pushes to get the "Other Backward Castes" (OBCs) a place at the education table.

Mr Simha reflects the naive view of many Indians who tend to look outside for the sources of ills of today's India. They blame the UK, the US, Pakistan, almost everyone but themselves. Mr Simha seem to imply that the UK was the roots to the India/China conflict in the 50's. China and India has has historical conflict with the Himalaya being a natural barrier. Furthermore, where were the Brits/US regarding the wars with the Moguls, how about the epic Mahabharat wars.

India needs to do some serious soul-searching, overcome the "them" and "us" within their own society if they are to move beyond successful mediocrity. They also have to stop this arrogance whenever a nation turns to India for asistance or sourcing means they are the best and are indispensible. Anyone who works in the US with an Indian professional quickly understands the element of arrogance.

I know I will get some shyte, but it is what it is.....jai ho.
FM
Well said Baseman.

The trade between India and China is mostly one way. The Chinese imports a few billion dollars in raw materials from India and in return they (the Chinese) export many billions of dollars of manufactured products to India.

The Dali lama made an important point. He said that the greater Tibet area always acted like a barrier between China and India to prevent conflict. With both Communist China and Republic of China both removing that barrier any conflict between China and India is now possible.

Without an Indira Priyadarshini Gandhi type character as Prime Minister any conflict with China will result in the ultimate defeat of India.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Wally:
The trade between India and China is mostly one way. The Chinese imports a few billion dollars in raw materials from India and in return they (the Chinese) export many billions of dollars of manufactured products to India.

Factually incorrect. India has some very strict rules on importation of finished goods. They prefer items to be manufactured in India. Indian companies like Jaguar etc also export a lot of finished products to China.
Mr.T
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.T:
quote:
Originally posted by Wally:
The trade between India and China is mostly one way. The Chinese imports a few billion dollars in raw materials from India and in return they (the Chinese) export many billions of dollars of manufactured products to India.

Factually incorrect. India has some very strict rules on importation of finished goods. They prefer items to be manufactured in India. Indian companies like Jaguar etc also export a lot of finished products to China.




Mr.T read this:



Growing Trade Deficit: India keeping close watch on China, mulls steps

Amiti Sen, ET Bureau Feb 18, 2010, 02.55am ISTTags:trade deficit|New Delhi


NEW DELHI: The government is closely monitoring the Chinese response to its concerns over the widening trade gap, which is expected to cross $20 billion in the current financial year. If the northern neighbour fails to take adequate steps in the next few months to reduce the deficit and move towards a more balanced trade ties, India would take retaliatory measures, a senior government official said.

"Our embassy in Beijing is watching the developments in China and has been asked to give us regular reports," he said, requesting anonymity. India had asked Chinese government last month to address its concerns. While the official refused to list the retaliatory steps the government might consider, analysts say various restrictions could be imposed on imports from China.

Last year, India's exports to China stood at $ 11 billion while China's exports to India was in excess of $27 billion. India had handed a demarche—a formal diplomatic representation of the official position, views, or wishes on a given subject from one government to another—to China during commerce minister Anand Sharma's visit to that country last month.
FM
A few years ago I spoke to a Sikh guy who was a soldier in the indian army. He told me that during the early 1980s' Indira Priyadarshini Gandhi ordered the complete overhaul and build up of Indian military forces on it's border with China. He said in 1987, he was stationed on the border and China tried to invade the Indian border again. He said that the result was that they killed alot of Chinese soldiers on the border and put the Chinese on the run. He said he think to himself that even in death Indira Priyadarshini Gandhi is saving India unlike her foolish Dad Nehru.
FM
I knew a few Indian Businessmen who moved their manfg ops to China due to worker productivity, consistent quality, cheap and reliable power, and ease of business. Many manufacture and re-import into India which works out cheaper than making it in India. The disclipined and educated workfore of China along with good infrastructure is a major competitive advantage with regards to manufacturing.
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×