hey knucklehead...what the heck is a "hindutva"? Never heard Guyanese use that term. please explain.

ask ravi dev or bayto dem nah

It does exist. Unlike Islamic Fundamentalism, it remains a peripheral movement in Guyana. Prashad who posts here sometimes, is  a Hindutva. He is pushing for a partition.

Can you explain what it means? As far as I can tell, it is connected to Hinduism in some way.

Google it or try this link: https://books.google.ca/books?...20guyana&f=false

Mits..you helping out tha chap who like to blurt

out knucklehead.

You mean to say, Islamic Fundamentalism is not just peripheral among Muslims?  Chief and Kari gon give you lil Brahmin rass a lil whooping!

It's usual behaviour of some  after a night of excessive drinking.  I sent him some but he is not answering the door.

It includes all of those who daily scream about "bad black man, good Indian", and blame all our racial woes on blacks.

These people also wail that, even though under the PPP, almost all the top slots were manned by Indians, that Indians were powerless.  Why?  Because all of those black clerks (mainly female) manning the various ministries, were "scary".

I don't see them as supporters of Islamic Fundamentalism. It's you who is calling them Islamic Fundamentalist.

I dont see how we can build a Hindu country in Guyana. We are a multiethnic and multi-religious country. Its better to leave people to practice their own religious beliefs...mixing politics with religion is a recipe for disaster...look at the Middle East and elsewhere. In any case, its a good thing the political parties are not campaigning on the basis of religion.   

The PPP/C always used the Hindu Dharmic Sabha and most recently mobilized the Hindu supporters during the past Diwali. Jagdeo used the stage to backball a female artist on stage and called up Ramatar and back balled him.

basement dweller, yes, there is such a thing as Islamic Fundamentalism, just like there is fundamentalism in all religions and Associations, and Groups, etc. There are Radical Islamists, yes. Most terrorism emanate from Arab countries where Islam is the dominant religion, like there are countries where Islam is the dominant religion but no terrorism emanate from. That's not the debate here. The debate has been, are all Muslims terrorists? IS Islam a terroristic religion? Should Muslims all over stop work and go fight ISIS and parade in Times Square and Paris and London 24/7 or lest be called terrorists themselves? Should we panic and have databases and stop orphans, children and women refugees who have nothing to do with attacks on the West? Who are the people who attacked in PAris - Muslims or Muslim converts who drink at bars, wear tattoos (like the suicide bomber girl last week whose parents are Algerians) or men who are Hispanics and Blacks and Whites who convert and are among the leading Foreign Fighters for ISIS? Look in Trinidad and see who are the Muslims who call for arms to go to Syria and Iraq, who are they? Abu Bakr and the converted Muslims. Tnhese basement man are the questions.

"Using the Dharmic Sabha" is not the same as wanting to build a Hindu country...I dont follow the logic

caribny, you are like Trump who attacks the wrong problem. Instead of the European-born who travel to the US on a visa waiver program freely who can do damage Trump focuses on the children of Syrian refugees (36 of them came in to this country last year - so rigorous that program is). Ben Carson talks about all Muslims as rabid dogs, instead of tackling the radical Islamic terrorists (and Muslims cannot be President of the US). caribny talks about coolieman must apologize for Jagdeo's criminal empire before he acknowledges what Burnham did in the 70s and 80s. This is the same hypocritical caribny who says he's an equal-opportunity attacker on both black and indian racism. HEe does not see the attacks here by us on Jagdeo and the corrupt PPP. All he sees is this fictional delusion - we only say "Blackman bad, Coolieman good".

That's the point VishMahabir, there is a growing Hinduvta presence in Guyana just like there is a radicalisation or Arabization of Muslims who left the shores of Guyana and become fossiized. There are both extremists. Our first task is to acknowledge that, then we can keep caribny off our backs with his blackman bad coolieman good narrative.

You are a bit slow today but then again you called me a "knucklehead". Remember? Take a break or speak to Ravi dev.

Now mullah bai, I take the word of Ayaan Hirsi Ali over you nutty irrational senseless rants.  You seem hell-bent on making a case that does not exists.

http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2...am-interview-ctn.cnn

You are a living example of the "bad black man, good Indian narrative" EVERY commentary about race in Guyana is about the PNC, and its need to apologize to Indians. 

Clearly in your little head ALL the wrong was done by the PNC (at least prior to Jagdeo) and its was ONLY Indians who suffered.

Later you screamed that Jagan was fully inclusive towards blacks, and its only because of how black people think that they didn't embrace the PPP.

So tell me how is this NOT "black man good, Indians good, so black man has to apologize?".

You can wilfully be a rabid dog when you chose to be.

 I never said that Indians must apologize for Jagdeo.  I said that IF Indians demand that the PNC must apologize to them AS INDIANS, then they must apologize to the PPP for its treatment of blacks.

My position has ALWAYS been that either BOTH apologize or NEITHER should.

My position has also been that those who demand ethnic inclusion by Granger should discuss why the blatantly RACIST behavior of the PPP SINCE 1961 has NOT been discussed by them!

It is not ONLY the PNC which was racist. It was the PNC AND the PPP!

But your screams for apology make no notice of that!

So continue with your "black man baad, Indian good" narrative. You do know that you strengthen the argument that if even moderate Indians are so disdainful of blacks, that there is no hope that Indians can ever be ethnically inclusive.

I do NOT see attacks on you about PPP RACISM.  I see attacks by you about PNC racism. 

You did NOT say that the PNC should apologize to GUYANESE.  You said that they should apologize to INDIANS.

This being your focus because in your Hindutva head, ONLY Indians matter to you. 

You made NO consideration of how Africans and mixed voters would have reacted to a PNC apology ONLY to Indians. 

You didn't consider that those blacks and mixed who suffered under Burnham (as did Linden and Buxton) wonder how come they didn't also merit an apology if one was being given out to Indians.

You didn't consider how blacks, the MAJORITY of whom felt that the PPP was not only corrupt but also RACIST, would have reacted if the racism which they suffered was not acknowledged.

NONE of those things, because in your head ONLY INDIANS MATTER!

I don't know why you think that this strengthens your case.

Were the terrorists only from the Middle East, we could draw confidence that attempts to destroy ISIS and Al Qaeda by bombing them might work.  But we know that any one with a cell phone and/or a lap top can commit acts of terror, without regard to where they are.

So Kari what is it about the Muslim religion which attracts so many people born in Europe to commit acts of terror. Note that many of these people were indoctrinated by radical MUSLIM CLERICS.  Remember the shoe bomber guy in the UK? He was one as are many other Europeans.

There is rot WITHIN the Muslim religion, and it is NOT only due to the political struggles in the Middle East.

When scores of Evangelicals are bombing or killing people from Australia, to China, and onto Norway then you can get back to me.

When Jehovah's Witness are strapping guns and fighting the Holy War in Trinidad, then you can get back to me.

It is YOU who have this fixation with the notion that terrorism is defined by territory, so removing the jihadists from a specific location solves the problem.

Ok fellas, this stuff is over my head..I am out. 

We know that you are not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.