Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Stop playing with new security labels -APNU to gov’t

 

Posted By Stabroek editor On January 3, 2013 @ 4:41 pm In Local News |

 

A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) today called on the People’s Progressive Party/Civic government to introduce, as a matter of urgency, a serious security strategy to protect citizens from criminal violence and to stop playing with labels.

At a press conference today, APNU was responding to the raft of security measures announced on Friday by Minister of Homes Affairs Clement Rohee. APNU lambasted the minister and listed security plans with similar features going all the way back to 2000 which were not implemented by PPP/C governments.

 

The Partnership accused Rohee, of deliberately avoiding references, in his 31st December 2012 Press Conference, to what it said was the high rate of armed robberies (about 8 per day), smuggling, gun-running, money-laundering, narcotics-trafficking, people-trafficking and piracy among other things.

It said that Rohee’s plan failed to provide assurances that human safety will be enhanced and police performance will be improved.

 

The statement said in part: “APNU demands that the Capita-Symonds Report – which was handed over to Mr. Rohee 22 months ago, in March 2011, and now forms the basis of the new ‘plan’ – be laid before the National Assembly. It should also be published in the media so that the public could read its contents and assess its relevance to crime fighting and the improvement of the efficiency and effectiveness of the Guyana Police Force.

 

“APNU points out that there has been no shortage of so-called plans for security sector reform by the PPPC administration over the past 12 years. These efforts, however, have been deliberately derailed and not one of them has been fully implemented. Some of these plans are:

  • 2000. The British Department for International Development-funded consultants − Symonds Group Limited − released their report on the Guyana Police Force after reviewing it, between October and November 2000.
  • 2002. President Bharrat Jagdeo promulgated a “menu of measures” claiming that they would improve the police force’s crime-fighting capacity. Jagdeo actually went to London to meet the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to seek British assistance.
  • 2003. The British government sent the Defence Advisory Team to Georgetown to conduct a study of the security sector and produce a report which recommended ways in which the Police Force’s capability could be enhanced.
  • 2004. The Disciplined Forces Commission, under the chairmanship of Justice Ian Chang, presented its report to the National Assembly containing 164 recommendations for Police Force and other security sector reforms.
  • 2005. The British Scottish Police College conducted a series of management training programmes. It presented the Guyana Police Force Strategic Plan in partnership with the Inter-American Development Bank as part of the Guyana Citizens Security Programme.
  • 2006. British Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Baroness Valerie Amos, and President Jagdeo agreed to a Statement of Principles which formed the basis on which the British Department for International Development proceeded with a fresh consultancy. A new British-funded security sector reform team visited, in October 2006, and integrated various local and foreign initiatives into a holistic strategy. The PPP/C administration instead adopted a Citizen Security Programme which was to be funded by a US$19.8 million loan from the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).
  • 2007. British High Commissioner, Fraser Wheeler, and Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr Roger Luncheon, signed an Interim Memorandum of Understanding for a Security Sector Reform Action Plan in August 2007.
  • 2009. The British Government decided to abandon the negotiations with the Guyana Government of Guyana for the ₤4.9M Security Sector Reform Action Plan in the face of unprincipled resistance by the PPP/C administration to previously-agreed guidelines contained in the Statement of Principles agreed with Baroness Amos.
  • 2010. Mr. Clement Rohee stated at an Inter-American security conference that “Guyana has no desire to have any resident experts in our country at this point in time [nor] …in the not too distant future either…We have enough experts here in Guyana in the police force, in the security sector…So we don’t need a foreign expert to come and tell us… In fact we have already gone a very far way with the reforms so I don’t know what we need an expert to tell us about…when it comes to bringing experts to Guyana for the security sector that is a no go.”
  • 2011. The British consultancy firm – Capita-Symonds – presented the final draft of the strategic plan for the modernisation of the Guyana Police Force to the Home Affairs Ministry, on Thursday 29th March 2011.
  • 2012.  Mr. Clement Rohee made a statement to a Press Conference, on 31st December 2012, outlining recommendations contained in the Capita-Symonds Report.

“A Partnership for National Unity makes it clear that it supports the implementation of a serious security sector reform programme to enhance human safety. The Partnership will not comment on the alleged contents of the Capita-Symonds report until it has had the opportunity to study it.

 

“The Partnership iterates its previously-stated support for reforms based, essentially, on the recommendations of the Disciplined Forces Commission and the agreed lavish funded Security Sector Reform Action Plan both of which the People’s Progressive Party/Civic administration failed to implement over the past nine years.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

You keep braying about fake police reform, but I am yet to see a comprehensive plan by the afc/pnc to leverage their majority in parliament and institute lasting reform. I told you once before not to reinvent the wheel. Look to the developed nations to determine how they kept corruption to an acceptable level. As you know it is futile to think any administration can eradicate corruption completely. Every few months we have sting operations in the US to bring officials to justice. Look how Kerick went  down. Similar types of methods should be brought to a vote in parliament, instead you people squander your majority in parliament. You have no vision other than to give us more of what the PPP is doing. You just want to drink the same soup that is afforded the PPP. 

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

You keep braying about fake police reform, but I am yet to see a comprehensive plan by the afc/pnc to leverage their majority in parliament and institute lasting reform. I told you once before not to reinvent the wheel. Look to the developed nations to determine how they kept corruption to an acceptable level. As you know it is futile to think any administration can eradicate corruption completely. Every few months we have sting operations in the US to bring officials to justice. Look how Kerick went  down. Similar types of methods should be brought to a vote in parliament, instead you people squander your majority in parliament. You have no vision other than to give us more of what the PPP is doing. You just want to drink the same soup that is afforded the PPP. 

I have not read this amount of trash for a long time. 

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

You keep braying about fake police reform, but I am yet to see a comprehensive plan by the afc/pnc to leverage their majority in parliament and institute lasting reform. I told you once before not to reinvent the wheel. Look to the developed nations to determine how they kept corruption to an acceptable level. As you know it is futile to think any administration can eradicate corruption completely. Every few months we have sting operations in the US to bring officials to justice. Look how Kerick went  down. Similar types of methods should be brought to a vote in parliament, instead you people squander your majority in parliament. You have no vision other than to give us more of what the PPP is doing. You just want to drink the same soup that is afforded the PPP. 

I have not read this amount of trash for a long time. 

That is why you will continue to be on the outskirts looking in. You folks have no vision, you need to use your majority in parliament expeditiously and stop running after Jagdeo and other battles you can't win. Even that joker fool recognized this. 

FM
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:

It's called lame duck opposition. Do nuttin'.

 

This we can agree on. Imagine these Opposition lungeeras can't manage to accomplish anything with control of Parliament.

 

I guess they need a 2/3 majority and the support of PPP MPs in order to accomplish anything.

FM
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

The PNC is full of PPP soup drinkers. So it is impossible to get an effective opposition. It's the AFC that is doing most of the work to keep the government accountable.

You mean the AFC is also full of PPP soup drinkers. Most of them that defected were former high class soup drinkers. The mantra is that when the soup is done they run to the AFC. hahhaha Also  note all the corruption going on in the AFC that conscience has been bringing to your attention on a daily basis.

FM
Originally Posted by JoKer:
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:

It's called lame duck opposition. Do nuttin'.

 

This we can agree on. Imagine these Opposition lungeeras can't manage to accomplish anything with control of Parliament.

 

I guess they need a 2/3 majority and the support of PPP MPs in order to accomplish anything.

The opposition, in particular the AFC, have squandered the chance to have a meaningful and positive impact on policy in Guyana.  Instead of trying to out do the PNC "bad-man" image, they should have worked with both sides to further the agenda of the people.  Instead their lose canon members went of leading riots and creating mayhem causing people to get killed for nothing.  Everyone in the group seem to run on their own track and have their own agenda.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

You keep braying about fake police reform, but I am yet to see a comprehensive plan by the afc/pnc to leverage their majority in parliament and institute lasting reform. I told you once before not to reinvent the wheel. Look to the developed nations to determine how they kept corruption to an acceptable level. As you know it is futile to think any administration can eradicate corruption completely. Every few months we have sting operations in the US to bring officials to justice. Look how Kerick went  down. Similar types of methods should be brought to a vote in parliament, instead you people squander your majority in parliament. You have no vision other than to give us more of what the PPP is doing. You just want to drink the same soup that is afforded the PPP. 

I have not read this amount of trash for a long time. 

I have to agree with TK, BG talking sheer tripe.

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

You keep braying about fake police reform, but I am yet to see a comprehensive plan by the afc/pnc to leverage their majority in parliament and institute lasting reform. I told you once before not to reinvent the wheel. Look to the developed nations to determine how they kept corruption to an acceptable level. As you know it is futile to think any administration can eradicate corruption completely. Every few months we have sting operations in the US to bring officials to justice. Look how Kerick went  down. Similar types of methods should be brought to a vote in parliament, instead you people squander your majority in parliament. You have no vision other than to give us more of what the PPP is doing. You just want to drink the same soup that is afforded the PPP. 

Here you are, sitting in full clown regalia on the PPP clown car and yet pretending to make sense!

 

HOw nations address corruption is not on the agenda of the PPP. Only the PNC and the AFC ever suggests we need systemic changes beginning with constitutional reform to restrain excesses.

 

If you have problems with what is said above then where is your voice on against the PPP's excesses. They claim not only independence of the legislature but complete authority over it to do as they please! Is that democracy?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×