I am sure you are other worldly. Being born into the real world immediately confers on the individual all rights and privileges of the state. Yes, to be human is to be possessed of rights.
Again, you take the lordly step to presume yourself civilized when you know definitively that was not your lot or considered your lot until your ancestors came here but that is another story.
Amerindians on the other hand are a forest people, living very closely to what the father of western constitutionalism considered the to be the ground of rights, the state of nature. Please avail yourself to Locke's second treatise on government. It will be a civilizing exercise.
Nonsense, a lot of meaningless ramblings again without saying anything. The bottom line is that these folks did not own any land nor did they have a concept of land ownership. They didn't have a system of governance nor a stem of land ownership or inheritance of such land on to successive generations. Their mere existence in the jungle does not translate into land ownership. Animals live in the jungle but they don't own it.
Bai, hindus back in India never own land either. The zamindar owned it all.
These are old culture yuh writing about.