30 yrs ago the ppp shoot this same shit at their bottom house meeting,maybe it was okay for then,but you fools still living in the past.or is it a excuse to rob the taxpayers money.mudheads it the 21 century,the whole world is changing

I rarely respond with a reasoned thought out analysis to the PPP Mudheads here because most won't even read it, those who do read it won't understand it, and those that do understand it will simply be intellectually dishonest in replying.

For PPP Mudheads, this forum is one grand opportunity to display the worst traits of Indians.

They think they're being clever and cunning and in the "in" crowd when all they're doing is polishing the boots of people who wouldn't even piss on them.

YUh right meh nah handastan one shit yuh just write,

I know you don't bro. I know you don't. I don't expect you to

Yuh thimk yuh gun grt tmie to give me some Lessons???

Once again, you talk too much and too fast.  I never said that, but let the people know if you intend to have a joint ticket, announce BEFORE, so the people truly have their say.  They will decide if they want it.  If they do, then it's their choice, free and clear.  No con-man games.

Unfortunately I think its too late to teach a confirmed rice eater new tricks.

Dem bais seh: "once a daag ah suck egg, he always guh suck egg"

So the whole of the British Commonwealth is wrong....Except you mudheads in the PPP.

Good to know ayuh suh smart that even the UK can larn from ayuh

Bhai meh Cholesterol high, me dont eat eggs.

Ok kankawa brain, tell me what is wrong with the people knowing ahead of time your merger/alliance plans?

Tell me katahar, what is wrong with the people knowing BEFORE of any plans.  Forget what others do, what is wrong with being open and honest with the populace.

Unless you are writing in code the highlighted sentence means exactly what it states. The point I make is that the people would have cast their lot and the resulting forging of common ground among coalition among  parties would be an added ingredient of freedom in the expressing of democratic outcome. Your assumption that it is fair is clearly wrong.

It's presence is simply to ensure the formation of a minority government and that is never the intent of any electoral process. Your idea of "showing" intent is classically the desire to conserve ideological, race or cultural hegemonies through facilitating its expression. Conserving these are always antithetical to democratic intent.

Pure shit.  I asked a SIMPLE question.  What is so wrong with the people knowing of merger/alliance plans ahead.  Tell me, on the basis of principle, what is so wrong with that.  Burnham sure got that one right.

stormbrain,shit will always be shit it does not matter how fancy you dress it,it will always stink,now go flush

I get it. You baseman mudhead and company know more than 1,000 years of acquired experience of the Westminster system and a concomitant 1,000 years of Anglo-American legal development.

Only you mudheads have managed to figure out that MPs must not be free to be MPs but instead must be employees of their Party leader.

I congratulate you on being so darn bright

You talk in parables, plain and simple, what is wrong with the people knowing your plans, what you plan to do with THEIR votes.  Laws and rules are nothing more than a reflection of the will of the PEOPLE, WE THE PEOPLE, not YOU the JOKERS and CON-MEN.

Yep, the canefields of Guyana know more about constitutional development and creating basic structures of government for a modern liberal democratic state than the whole of the civilized Western world.

You Mudheads are the apotheosis of the Western constitutional tradition. Amen!

joker them ppp bai donot have to be bright,all they have to do is be a collie,very racists and know how to thief

You pulling one of them con-man GR tactics, never answer, just flounce around donkey whose balls got stung by a bee.

Are you not amazed that our canecutters have managed to recreate the government structure of the Crown Colony of Guyana pre 1953 and package it as some sort of divine wisdom that they have crafted for the benefit of the ordinary people?

 It is not possible to do that as a rule. If there are more parties in play as in Sweden or Denmark how the hell would you do that? Your point is a devious construct by LFSB to prevent what he did to get into power from happening to him. It facilitates racism and that is what is wrong with it. That is why you like it.

Yea yea yea, it is also not possible for your PNC to win fair and square.  Just live with it fool.

 It depends on what is fair and square.  As long as the PPP can press race buttons and trade beads with the Amerinds and pretend their thief of state resources to facilitate their growing patronage system; fair and square will have to mean a revision of the constitution to bring accountability into the government, electoral process and give back to the people what was stolen from them at the founding of the state, political voice and exit. Lacking that we get crooks like Jagdeo, lackeys like Jabba the Hu, their attending minions in the cabinet and idiots like you paying homage to racial supremacy as a political methodology to keep them in office.

Very simple punk.  Fairness is the people knowing what they "buying" before they hit the "buy" button.  Now is that so difficult for you to understand?

Funny how you Mudheads including the Head Mudhead, Cheddi Ferret Jagan, discovered undying love for Burnham's Constitution.

Is that what they now call a man's reproductive organ?

Be cognizant of Guyana's Constitution and then make apt comments on the changes requiring sixty six percent or more of the MPs' approval.

See you plucked some more feathers off a harpy, drank an overdose of piwari, finished dancing at your pow pow, visit the communal women's village and now you post your verbose neurotic rambling.