ANPU's Basil Williams in continuing with his party's insistence that Minister of Home Affairs Clement Rohee be prevented from speaking in Parliament rose on a point of order challenging the Speaker's earlier ruling that Rohee be allowed to speak. However, the Speaker said his ruling on the matter is final.
source
Replies sorted oldest to newest
"While the combine opposition of A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and the Alliance For Change (AFC) display that they will abide by the ruling of the of the House Speaker to allow Home Affairs Minister Clement Rohee to speak, they voted against the Firearms Amendment Bill, which seeks to make trafficking in components of a firearm a criminal matter.
The bill which is said to be in keeping with Guyana’s obligation to international treaties on trafficking in arms and ammunition, was in the name of Rohee.
The bill which was not passed, cannot return to the house until the 11th Parliament."
This is more then enough proof, that the joint opposition doesn't have the interest of the Guyanese populace at heart, instead they are pre-oocupied playing partisan politics.
Clement Rohee's role in the Government - whether we agree or not - is directly under the control of the President of Guyana.
The opposition seem to be "tunneled vision" in pursuing an issues that has been adequately cleared up by documents plus in parliament.
The joint opposition is making a political "grand standing" in an attempt to attract a ray of limelight on themselves
Rohee must go. The opposition must use their majority to defeat his bills.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, which the President said he loves, said they can't. Only Ramotar can prevent him. Instead he prefers his Minister who allowed a Commissioner who "benefted materially from the drugs trade" to serve. That's Ramotar's choice to have a Minister of Home Affairs whose US visa was revoked. It does not mean the opposition should cooperate with him. It just means the opposition can't stop him from speaking in Parliament.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, which the President said he loves, said they can't. Only Ramotar can prevent him. Instead he prefers his Minister who allowed a Commissioner who "benefted materially from the drugs trade" to serve. That's Ramotar's choice to have a Minister of Home Affairs whose US visa was revoked. It does not mean the opposition should cooperate with him. It just means the opposition can't stop him from speaking in Parliament.
YADA YADA YADA LIL GIRLY TK CRIES.!!!!
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, which the President said he loves, said they can't. Only Ramotar can prevent him. Instead he prefers his Minister who allowed a Commissioner who "benefted materially from the drugs trade" to serve. That's Ramotar's choice to have a Minister of Home Affairs whose US visa was revoked. It does not mean the opposition should cooperate with him. It just means the opposition can't stop him from speaking in Parliament.
YADA YADA YADA LIL GIRLY TK CRIES.!!!!
==
Man at least you can demonstrate a slightly higher IQ.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six { 66% } percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the AFC cum PNC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the PNC cum AFC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
What you wrote there is logically irrelevant to the issue at stake. If Ramotar has the will then we can get the 66% to ditch or reform the bastardized Burnham Constitution which Ramotar said he loves. The opposition said it is willing to change it...he said he loves it.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the AFC cum PNC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
Typical diversion by a obsolete engineer. LOL!
TK...its advisable you come off of those dem seh, he seh, she seh stories, stick to the thread!!!
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the PNC cum AFC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
What you wrote there is logically irrelevant to the issue at stake. If Ramotar has the will then we can get the 66% to ditch or reform the bastardized Burnham Constitution which Ramotar said he loves. The opposition said it is willing to change it...he said he loves it.
Again and quite simple, show clearly where the AFC cum PNC made concrete efforts to present the needed changes to the Constitution.
TK...its advisable you come off of those dem seh, he seh, she seh stories, stick to the thread!!!
===
I think you should focus on your spy job.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the PNC cum AFC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
What you wrote there is logically irrelevant to the issue at stake. If Ramotar has the will then we can get the 66% to ditch or reform the bastardized Burnham Constitution which Ramotar said he loves. The opposition said it is willing to change it...he said he loves it.
Again and quite simple, show clearly where the AFC cum PNC made concrete efforts to present the needed changes to the Constitution.
They made significantly better effort that Ramotar who said publicly and clearly he sees nothing wrong with the bastardized Burnham Constitution.
The opposition should walk out when Rohee is speaking. They should then reurn and vote out his bills. He must go. Until then it's constipation.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the PNC cum AFC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
What you wrote there is logically irrelevant to the issue at stake. If Ramotar has the will then we can get the 66% to ditch or reform the bastardized Burnham Constitution which Ramotar said he loves. The opposition said it is willing to change it...he said he loves it.
Again and quite simple, show clearly where the AFC cum PNC made concrete efforts to present the needed changes to the Constitution.
They made significantly better effort that Ramotar who said publicly and clearly he sees nothing wrong with the bastardized Burnham Constitution.
Then, it would be quite simple for you to present the AFC cum PNC current proposals for the needed amendments to the Constitution.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the PNC cum AFC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
What you wrote there is logically irrelevant to the issue at stake. If Ramotar has the will then we can get the 66% to ditch or reform the bastardized Burnham Constitution which Ramotar said he loves. The opposition said it is willing to change it...he said he loves it.
Again and quite simple, show clearly where the AFC cum PNC made concrete efforts to present the needed changes to the Constitution.
They made significantly better effort that Ramotar who said publicly and clearly he sees nothing wrong with the bastardized Burnham Constitution.
Then, it would be quite simple for you to present the AFC cum PNC current proposals for the needed amendments to the Constitution.
Those of us who are involved in that know both PNC and AFC have specific proposals. When only Ramotar is said he does not want any.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, ...
Again TK - for more then the n-th time - it requires at least sixty-six percent of the MPs to made the needed changes to the Constitution.
When has the PNC cum AFC made any concrete proposals to effect the adjustments to the Constitution?
The current Government has, for practical purposes, 50% of the MPs in parliament.
What you wrote there is logically irrelevant to the issue at stake. If Ramotar has the will then we can get the 66% to ditch or reform the bastardized Burnham Constitution which Ramotar said he loves. The opposition said it is willing to change it...he said he loves it.
Again and quite simple, show clearly where the AFC cum PNC made concrete efforts to present the needed changes to the Constitution.
They made significantly better effort that Ramotar who said publicly and clearly he sees nothing wrong with the bastardized Burnham Constitution.
Then, it would be quite simple for you to present the AFC cum PNC current proposals for the needed amendments to the Constitution.
Those of us who are involved in that know both PNC and AFC have specific proposals. When only Ramotar is said he does not want any.
Perhaps only to the PNC cum AFC but unavailable to the public and the Government. 
How hard it is for APNU & AFC to accept the speaker's ruling and move on with the people's business? And here we have some intelligent fools are going along with the mantra that Rohee must go. These people are down right shameless with no good intention. This is child's play. When the world sees this they will laugh at us.
TK...its advisable you come off of those dem seh, he seh, she seh stories, stick to the thread!!!
and you, dear person, will stick to the bowl.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, which the President said he loves, said they can't. Only Ramotar can prevent him. Instead he prefers his Minister who allowed a Commissioner who "benefted materially from the drugs trade" to serve. That's Ramotar's choice to have a Minister of Home Affairs whose US visa was revoked. It does not mean the opposition should cooperate with him. It just means the opposition can't stop him from speaking in Parliament.
YADA YADA YADA LIL GIRLY TK CRIES.!!!!
But the majority opposition dash it up in the goat. no confidence in any goatish thing.
Well they cannot prevent Rohee from speaking because the bastardized Linden Forbes Samson Burnham Constitution, which the President said he loves, said they can't. Only Ramotar can prevent him. Instead he prefers his Minister who allowed a Commissioner who "benefted materially from the drugs trade" to serve. That's Ramotar's choice to have a Minister of Home Affairs whose US visa was revoked. It does not mean the opposition should cooperate with him. It just means the opposition can't stop him from speaking in Parliament.
YADA YADA YADA LIL GIRLY TK CRIES.!!!!
But the majority opposition dash it up in the goat. no confidence in any goatish thing.
Wow, such bitterness, signs of bewilderment. Seems you have no confidence in your agenda.
At a press conference today, March 15, the people's progressive party once again reiterated that it will stand behind Home Affairs Minister Clement Rohee, firmly stating that Rohee is here to stay.
The PPP is contending that Minister Rohee has been vindicated at all levels.
Central Committee Member Gail Teixeira says this is not the first time the opposition has tried this tactic though this time it is much more targeted.
On March 14 the parliamentary opposition voted down government’s Firearms (amendment) bill because the bill came in the name of Clement Rohee.
The opposition is arguing that it is a greater danger having Rohee responsible for national security.
However, Minister Rohee, who is also a central committee member of the PPP says the opposition with its move did not consider Guyana’s accountability to the citizens and the international community.
excerpts from http://www.inewsguyana.com
ANPU's Basil Williams in continuing with his party's insistence that Minister of Home Affairs Clement Rohee be prevented from speaking in Parliament rose on a point of order challenging the Speaker's earlier ruling that Rohee be allowed to speak. However, the Speaker said his ruling on the matter is final.
source
Rohee. Is on the dunce bench now. He is too dumb to pass any legislation in the home affairs .
Access to this requires a premium membership.