Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Ban Ki-moon warns against grave consequences of Syria strike

 

UN Secretary General Ban Ki moon has warned against extremely grave consequences of a looming US strike against Syria, saying further militarization of the turmoil must be avoided.



“I must warn that ill-considered military action could cause serious and tragic consequences,” Ban said on the sidelines of the G20 summit, which is underway in the Russian city of Saint Petersburg.

The UN chief underlined the necessity of avoiding “further militarization of the conflict [in Syria] and revitalize the search for a political settlement instead.”


Ban further described the humanitarian crisis in Syria as “unprecedented” in recent history, saying, “As some flee the country, others dig in to fight.”

In an earlier address to the Group of 20 economies, the UN chief said any decision regarding the Syrian issue should be taken within the framework of the UN Charter.

The G20 summit has failed to reach a consensus over the US plans for an attack on Syria.

While US President Barack Obama is using the meeting to push for his strike plan, the European Union, and the BRICS emerging economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) as well as Pope Francis - in a letter - warned against the dangers of a US military strike on Syria.

Washington’s war rhetoric against Syria intensified after Syria militants claimed the army had carried out a deadly chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21, which killed hundreds of Syrians.

Damascus has repeatedly said the deadly attack was a false-flag operation carried out by the Takfiri groups in a bid to draw in foreign military intervention.

On August 31, the US president delayed an imminent military strike against Syria to seek approval for the move from the Congress, which will debate the issue when lawmakers return from recess on September 9. The Obama administration has, however, said it “has the right” to attack Syria even if the Congress does not approve the measure.

 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

US to double its strike capacity for Syria war

 

The Pentagon is considering a doubling-up of its strike capacity as Washington is preparing for an attack on Syria.



US naval commanders announced on Thursday that US destroyers are “fully ready” to conduct what they called a “vast spectrum of operations” against Syria, The Independent reported.

According to the British newspaper, the Pentagon is planning to broaden its strike capacity using US Air Force assets including weapons-bearing bombers.

The assets include B-52 bombers, which can carry and launch cruise missiles, B1s armed with long-range and air-to-surface missiles, and B-2 stealth bombers.

Meanwhile, The New York Times has reported that the administration of President Barack Obama is considering the use of US and French aircraft to conduct strikes in Syria.

The Times also said that Obama has directed the Pentagon to expand the list of potential strike targets in Syria.

The involvement of manned aircraft in a possible military operation in Syria has raised concerns over how the US would act if American airmen were shot down while overflying Syrian territory.

“We have provided a range of options to the President, but we will not discuss the details of those options or our operational planning,” Commander Bill Speaks, a Pentagon spokesman, told The Independent.

On Wednesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 10-7 in favor of a resolution authorizing the Obama administration to attack Syria.

The resolution would limit military action against Syria to a period of 60 days, with the possibility of a 30-day extension. It also bans the use of US ground troops.

Obama administration officials have embarked upon an extensive lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill where US lawmakers in both chambers of Congress are expected to vote on military action against Syria after they return from recess on September 9.

Washington has accused the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad of launching a chemical attack in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21, killing hundreds of people. The Syrian government has strongly rejected the allegation.

Russia has said the evidence provided by the US and its allies is “inconclusive” and contains “no supporting facts.”

A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll has shown that nearly 60 percent of Americans are against missile strikes on Syria over accusations that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against militant groups.

The poll also shows that seven in 10 Americans oppose Washington and its allies’ arming militant groups in Syria.

FM

US does not want to wait for UN probe report on Syria Chemical weapons use, because US is the one who had supplied chemical weapons to Al-Qaeda and Al Nusra through their friends the Saudis. Therefore, they do not want to wait for UN report, US govt. is trying to fool around world and people of US by showing false CIA reports.

 

The US lost their credibility since  'they destroyed Iraq for weapons of Mass Destructions which was never found. Today Iraq is so much destabilised much so that killings has been a daily routine.....compliments USA 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×