Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by warrior:

when you have police shooting and killing unarm citizen,then the people have to defend themself,if jagan was alive he will tell you the same thing

The unfortunate killing of 3 persons by the police is no excuse for the actions of Benschop, Ramsaroop and the others who were there specifically to use the shooting to incite the people in furtherance of their own anti-government agenda

FM
Originally Posted by albert:
Originally Posted by warrior:

when you have police shooting and killing unarm citizen,then the people have to defend themself,if jagan was alive he will tell you the same thing

The unfortunate killing of 3 persons by the police is no excuse for the actions of Benschop, Ramsaroop and the others who were there specifically to use the shooting to incite the people in furtherance of their own anti-government agenda

Why so when its the police who cold bloodedly killed these people.

 

Now we hear allegations of tear gas being fired into people's homes.  Let us hope that this isnt true.

 

And guess what in a democracy if people chose to peddlean  "anti government" agenda they have a tright to. 

 

Do you know how Burnhamist you seem when you babble about "anti govt agenda"?  So often that was equated with treason in the worst days of Burnham's oppression. I see that the PPP=PNC.

 

No wonder so mnay in Guyana are terrified to volice their opinions on the phone and can only relax and tell the truth when they are outside of Guyana.

 

You might not like what Kissoon has to say but he has a right to say it.

FM
Originally Posted by albert:

 

Linden people were well aware of the intentions of Benschop, Ramsaroop and the others, hence the early warning. But the unfortunate police killings gave the extremists a window of opportunity to ply their trade.

Albert how come the PPP lost almost 50% of the votes in Linden in 2011 that they got in 2006.  This when there was a 25% increase in voter turn out ALL of this going to APNU who also took votes from the PPP and the AFC?

FM
Originally Posted by warrior:

when you have police shooting and killing unarm citizen,then the people have to defend themself,if jagan was alive he will tell you the same thing

Banna you talking crap. Benschop calling on the people to attack the cops and you justifying it. Don't bring Jagan in it. He dead and gone.

FM
Originally Posted by Ronald Sugrim:
Originally Posted by warrior:

when you have police shooting and killing unarm citizen,then the people have to defend themself,if jagan was alive he will tell you the same thing

Banna you talking crap. Benschop calling on the people to attack the cops and you justifying it. Don't bring Jagan in it. He dead and gone.

Jagan finally dead and gone for real?

I hope Burnham finally dead and gone for real,dem boys does blame him for their bad habits.

cain

the police shoot three unarm protestors and it seem so simple for you ppp crime family,but tell that to the dead people children and the community of linden.history is repeating it self all over again,this is the pnc in the 80 only it have a different colour,from black to indian.well in the 80 lots of blacks was honest to fight burham include rodney and today we have indians fighting the ppp  the only thing short here is a group trying to overthrow the goverment,maybe in time we will wait and see

FM
Originally Posted by warrior:

the police shoot three unarm protestors and it seem so simple for you ppp crime family,but tell that to the dead people children and the community of linden.history is repeating it self all over again,this is the pnc in the 80 only it have a different colour,from black to indian.well in the 80 lots of blacks was honest to fight burham include rodney and today we have indians fighting the ppp  the only thing short here is a group trying to overthrow the goverment,maybe in time we will wait and see

Burnham ran a dictatorship via rigged elections, aided and abetted by the military.  The PPP is/has been subject to free and fair elections even though you may not like the outcome.  There is no need for unconstitutional measures to remove the Govt.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
 

Burnham ran a dictatorship via rigged elections, aided and abetted by the military.  The PPP is/has been subject to free and fair elections even though you may not like the outcome.  There is no need for unconstitutional measures to remove the Govt.


Baseman I can assure you that had the African/mixed vote been larger than the Indian vote Burnham would not have had to rig elections.  Why would one rig if our ethnopolitical environment suggests that the winner is the one who has the largest tribe?

 

He would have been every bit as ruthless towards Indians as the PPP is towards blacks...and like them would scream that he won fair and square, suggesting that this fact gives them license to abuse and oppress.

FM
Originally Posted by Ronald Sugrim:

and incitement is incitement and you should condemn it.


Did you condemn The Chronicle when it wrote racist bigotry against AfoGuyanese?  NO!

 

Did you condemn albert and his buddies at GINA when they write lies against the people of Linden?  NO!

 

So your attempt to show that you are objective falls flat.   Those groups are every bit as dangerous and as unproductive as Benschop...a soup licker whose rage at the PPP is because they had little soup for blacks like him.

 

Just like your screams that redux, caribj and stormborn accept the lie that 3,000 Indians were killed and raped by blacks, and your refusal to condemn attacks by PPP supporters against blacks in 1964.  When this demand is made of you you claim that it is hatred.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Ronald Sugrim:

What is the meaning of this?


You better learn that as by the time the PPP is finished this will be the new language of Guyana.

Or this:

Sasa sisi ni bosi, wewe ni mbwa chakula

What ever that is its not a language which Guyanese have any interest in learning. 

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by baseman:
 

Burnham ran a dictatorship via rigged elections, aided and abetted by the military.  The PPP is/has been subject to free and fair elections even though you may not like the outcome.  There is no need for unconstitutional measures to remove the Govt.


Baseman I can assure you that had the African/mixed vote been larger than the Indian vote Burnham would not have had to rig elections.  Why would one rig if our ethnopolitical environment suggests that the winner is the one who has the largest tribe?

 

He would have been every bit as ruthless towards Indians as the PPP is towards blacks...and like them would scream that he won fair and square, suggesting that this fact gives them license to abuse and oppress.

What you mean, I don't see Indians going around in gangs brutalizing and abusing Afros as was common pre-1992.  Burnham himself was not the biggest of the problems for our daily lives.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
 

What you mean, I don't see Indians going around in gangs brutalizing and abusing Afros as was common pre-1992.  Burnham himself was not the biggest of the problems for our daily lives.


No the Indo elites just pay black criminals (including the police) to do that.

 

Note that when Indians protest.  No issues.  When black people protest. BULLETS!

 

ANd BTW those gangs that you talk about also broke into and robbed BLACK PEOPLE.  A friend of mine returned to Guyana and on his first night there he was robbed.  The police didnt care the slightest.

 

You know even when you arent trying to be a racist you just cant help being one.   Only concerned with what happens to Indians.  Blacks do not matter to you.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×