Skip to main content

July 29, 2021

Source

An investment of US$200 to US$600 million has been proposed for the nearly 1,000-acre Best Village, West Bank of Demerara, oil and gas shore base development, a project summary by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states.

The consortium of local companies executing the investment says that mangrove destruction will be “insignificant”.  Mangroves on the West Demerara were controversially removed by another company planning a shore base, Tristar.

“The proposed project area will fringe approximately 60 ha of mangrove forest comprising mainly black mangroves (Avicennia germinans)…” the project summary, uploaded on the EPA’s website on Tuesday stated.

“… It must be noted that the proposed project does not contemplate large scale removal of the mangrove forest in the area. The plan is to leave the existing forest intact as far as practical. There may be some minor impacts due to clearance for example access road, but these are expected to be insignificant. The final designs will articulate the level of footprint expected,” it adds.

On Monday, Stabroek News reported that local businessman and gold miner, Andron Alphonso, is investing in the oil & gas sector and has applied to the EPA to set up a shore base facility at Best Village.

The project is being undertaken through NRG Holdings Inc, a consortium of three local entrepreneurs including Alphonso, whose company is ZRN Investment Inc. The other two are HADI’S World Incorporated owned by Nazar ‘Shell’ Mohammed and National Hardware Guyana Ltd with its representative, Nicholas Deygoo.

The EPA has stated that the Best Village shore base would not require an Environmental Impact Assessment, noting that the project was screened and categorised as having no significant impacts. And while the EPA did not state that the proposed facility would be in an area with mangroves, it noted that “detailed specific mitigation measures” should be explained. The EPA’s decision to not require an EIA for these large oil and gas projects has raised concerns.

The agency said that it will also prescribe in its authorisation, robust measures and safeguards to ensure compliance with its Act and that an Environmental and Social Management Plan is required to be prepared to address specific issues identified in the screening process.

According to the project summary, the project “is estimated to cost approximately US$200-600 million” which shall include geotechnical and environmental studies, engineering works, dredging operations, reclamation, and the construction of wharf, storage, warehouse, and safety facilities.

It describes the proposed initiative as “an industry leading shore base facility for the oil & gas sector including the possible environmental and social impacts” and with an overall goal “to develop this landmark facility as a means of equipping and bringing tremendous value to locals in the management and operation of the emerging oil & gas sector while directly meeting the high standards of overall industry needs.” It continued, “This space will be developed into sustainable and industry leading facilities showcasing what can be done through local content, investment, and international partnership.”

Of its proposed 988 acres (400 hectares) of coastal and nearshore lands and water located seaward of existing mangroves on the Atlantic coast at Best Village, the project summary says that 148 acres of that area has mangroves.

“The coastal area consists of a combination of natural and man-made sea defence structures, tidal mud banks and beaches, and approximately 60 ha [hectares] of mangrove forests. The proposed site is bounded to the east by the confluence of the Demerara River; the west by the foreshore of Best Village; the south by mangrove forest; and north, the Atlantic Ocean,” the summary informs.

Addressing possible environmental and social impacts, the project outline says that the main activities associated with the project during the construction phase are: land clearing, earthworks, stockpiling, machine operation, and concrete works, and they will have the potential to affect the environment “directly or indirectly.”

“The potential impacts are loss of land and habitats, pollution of air and sedimentation of surface water, generation of solid waste, and health and safety related. The impacts, however, are expected to be insignificant and short term in duration and therefore mitigable,” the document states.

It gives a breakdown of expected impacts and mitigation measures the company has in place for air quality and noise, social, human health and safety, and mangroves and fauna.

Emphasised throughout the summary was that environmental monitoring programmes will be implemented to address all activities that have been identified to have any potential impacts on the environment during normal operations and upset conditions.

Underscoring that the shorebase plan is being executed to add to both local content and partner with government as it builds a holistic development plan for Guyana, the project summary notes that inadequate facilities for this country’s oil & gas sector leads to opportunities being gobbled up by other countries such as Trinidad and Tobago.

“This proposed project will help the Government of Guyana meet its strategic priorities to boost the economy and stimulate job growth along with helping the country expand key shipping, port, and shore base facilities to rapidly meet industry requirements,” the summary states.

“The Port of Vreed-en-Hoop will be established, inter alia, by a consortium of leading local entrepreneurs highlighting the capabilities of Guyanese and 100% indigenous ownership of this project (the “Consortium”). The goal is to develop a landmark facility that will equip and bring tremendous value to the management and operation of the emerging oil & gas sector while directly meeting the high standards of overall industry needs,” it adds.

It estimates that there will be job opportunities for approximately 150 to 200 persons during construction phase and 50 to 100 persons for the basic operation and maintenance of the base port facilities. The company said that  once the Phase 1 components are fully operational, inclusive of service providers, approximately 1,000 persons will be employed. This number is expected to double with Phase 2 components completed and operationalised.

The port is expected to comprise but is not necessarily limited to: an offshore terminal, fabrication, umbilical and spooling yards, administrative buildings which will house offices and modernised logistics centres, warehousing, container management systems and potential for storage of sub-sea equipment, pipe inspection and repairs, areas for individual and separate operators to provide relevant services to the offshore oil and gas operators including but not limited to waste management/effluent treatment plant(s), other environmental services, lodgings and mud plant.

There will also be areas for a wharf, berths, dry dock, and a potential helipad.

Of the many services to be provided, the project notes that the local economy will benefit from employment, duties and taxes, ancillary goods and services, and capacity-building, as it emphasises that this country must now seize the opportunity that comes with the growing sector.

It contends that since oil was discovered here in 2015, many jobs have gone to other countries because this country isn’t equipped with the facilities needed. “Guyana will continue to lose out under the current arrangement, unless increased emphasis is placed on the development of these supporting facilities that capture these benefits in-country, and direct them into the development of the Guyanese people.   “Guyana’s Government and the private sector will have to work together to ensure that they benefit from these opportunities through infrastructure development and building the requisite skills and competence in all possible respects to capitalize on the opportunities that the new sector is anticipated to bring. The oil & gas rapid growth and the country’s economic transformation is expected to be substantial, with opportunities for infrastructural and logistical,” the summary also declares.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Interesting that Guyanese business people forming partners. People do need work and if these things materialise there will be work. The economy is now revolving around oil and gas. Hope they don't clear too much mangroves. It means they have to make manmade sea defense. And what would the people of Best grain if there are floods every two years?

FM
@Mitwah posted:

My neighbor is from Best Village. He says to hell with the mangroves. He thinks this is a good initiative for West Dem. It means jobs, jobs, jobs.

Then he better get himself and family educated. Other than that, he will be used for only physical labor and janitorial services.

S
@seignet posted:

Then he better get himself and family educated. Other than that, he will be used for only physical labor and janitorial services.

LOL! De fella is a CA. His son and 2 daughters are professionals here. He also said that the Mangrove only protects soil erosion and that the GOG of the day need to build a wall to keep the ocean out.

Mitwah
@Mitwah posted:

LOL! De fella is a CA. His son and 2 daughters are professionals here. He also said that the Mangrove only protects soil erosion and that the GOG of the day need to build a wall to keep the ocean out.

Duh is good econ from the chartered accountant

FM

Unfortunately, in approx fifteen years these buildings just might be used as storage facilities. It is quite possible the only mention of oil will be found in history books.

cain
Last edited by cain
@cain posted:

Unfortunately, in approx fifteen years these buildings just might be used as storage facilities. It is quite possible the only mention of oil will be found in history books.

Guyana is 40 plus years behind bro...People bin say dat dankey cart gona be extinct long ago...in Guyana capital you can’t travel two blocks without running into one...

sachin_05

What are these investors hoping to accomplish?  The oil companies are looking to the oceans for oil because all that they need is a drill, a hose, and a ship to extract and transfer the oil to an oil tanker. Low overhead is the name of the game.  Few employees are needed to man the ship so low overhead cost means more profit. Are these investors hoping to wash and store equipment?  Are they hoping that the white crew comes to shore and refresh?  What is their aim to make money with this project? I can't see how they will make a profit because the oil companies will look for the lowest costs that they can get.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
@sachin_05 posted:

Guyana is 40 plus years behind bro...People bin say dat dankey cart gona be extinct long ago...in Guyana capital you can’t travel two blocks without running into one...

The dankey cart is better for the environment so perhaps in time every family will own one.

cain
@Prashad posted:

What are these investors hoping to accomplish?  The oil companies are looking to the oceans for oil because all that they need is a drill, a hose, and a ship to extract and transfer the oil to an oil tanker. Low overhead is the name of the game.  Few employees are needed to man the ship so low overhead cost means more profit. Are these investors hoping to wash and store equipment?  Are they hoping that the white crew comes to shore and refresh?  What is their aim to make money with this project? I can't see how they will make a profit.

Perhaps it has nothing to do with oil.

cain

Gas-to-shore project, a recipe for bankruptcy – US Financial Expert


Kaieteur News – Considering Guyana’s poor power generation capacity and infrastructural systems, almost all of the nation’s leaders have thrown their support behind ExxonMobil laying the ground work to bring gas to shore. But industry experts are of the firm conviction that such a venture could prove financially detrimental to Guyana, especially when one considers the nation’s weak capacity to negotiate fair deals for the country.
Making this point in particular was Tom Sanzillo, Director of financial analysis at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).
He was part of a panel that included international lawyer, Melinda Janki; Chatham House Associate Fellow, Dr. Valerie Marcel and former minister, Mr. David Patterson.
These industry stakeholders participated in the end-of-year discussion on Kaieteur Radio’s programme, Guyana’s Oil and You.
During the discussions on Guyana’s proclivity to bring gas to shore in a mere four years, Sanzillo said he can certainly appreciate the nation’s desires to respond to the rising demand for electricity as well as to find a solution to the issue of power outages and high electricity costs.
He stressed, however, that the manner in which Guyana went about negotiating a lopsided deal for oil provides no evidence that it can confidently do otherwise for bringing gas to shore.
The financial expert said, “…I have to be frank about this, the way the contracts were negotiated for this oil endeavour gives me no confidence that the country has any ability to negotiate the best price for a pipeline and other infrastructure to bring gas to shore…There is no evidence of that. In fact, one has evidence to the contrary.”
Sanzillo also pointed to the alarming fact that the citizenry is still to know whether there was a cost comparison between where renewable markets are and the proposed gas project for in Guyana.
In addition to this, he said that based on his observations of how Guyana’s leaders intend to pursue the gas to shore project spells out “a recipe for financial bankruptcy for Guyana.”
In this regard, Sanzillo recalled that the leaders have intentions of having ExxonMobil build a pipeline that would allow for the project to be brought to shore.
Guyana would not be paying for the gas but it would have to pay ExxonMobil the cost for transporting the resource.
By subjecting itself to such an arrangement, Sanzillo said that Guyana is in simple terms, taking the little oil money it would make and investing it in another fossil fuel project that would leave the country saddled with more debt.
He said that Guyana is not only accepting a lopsided deal with the Stabroek block but it is now moving to invest in a project that will handsomely support the interests of oil companies and their bankers. This he alluded is not just backward, but a dangerous precipice for Guyana to be hanging from.

Source:

Mitwah

Sanzillo also pointed to the alarming fact that the citizenry is still to know whether there was a cost comparison between where renewable markets are and the proposed gas project for in Guyana.
In addition to this, he said that based on his observations of how Guyana’s leaders intend to pursue the gas to shore project spells out “a recipe for financial bankruptcy for Guyana.”

Mitwah

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×