Dem mek it? Doh is great foh third wurl peopkle bai.

Waiting for confirmation

Video from the war Room is tense right now.

Real tense now, the CEO talking to Modi but they do not look happy

From their body language it does not look successful. But congrats anyway.

Lots of women Engineers were involved with this project. You can see the pride in all the faces.

India lost control of the spacecraft. The chairman broke down and had to be consoled by PM Modi. I hope they are successful next time

They doan know what happened. I know. The Chinese are already there and they blow up the lunar lander. Damn Chinese, dey bad no azz, dey wuking fuh pakistan. 

These are the issues of trial and error for these endeavors.

Focus will be on future initiatives as they progress with this project.

Nehru posted:

Lots of women Engineers were involved with this project. You can see the pride in all the faces.

Them women not covered up. Where is the chief?

Don't dismiss it so soon. It has been located and can still turn out to be successful. Remember, while nothing is easy for India, they still find ways to defy the odds. Keep the faith.

Bai...yuh is learn from failure. Remember dem Indoman na hack in dem Merikaman computa and tief dem technology...like we Chinaman. Dem Indoman was refuse de technology and dem mek de whole ting by demselves. De mission is over half percent success so far. Chanrayaan 2 still going round de moon lookin foh de water Chandrayaan 1 find back in 2008. Dem need foh master de soft landing thing next time. Dem can launch nuff satellite but dem gat to do de soft landing. Dem peopkle launch 100 satelloite in one rocket launch. De soft landing ting is important because nuff, nuff technology does come fram it like how NASA does gee de US military de technology. Doh will mek de Tejas jet fighers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTRE_GTX-35VS_Kaveri) dem mekking pon dem own better. Dem people doan hack de Merika technology. When yuh can mek yuh own plan dem yuh can get nuff, nuff foh yuh army.

De biggest success is seeing dem lil pickney face light up and excited. Imagine how much of dem go do science and maths now. Modi show why he win de eleckshun and is wan great politician. Dem lil pickney ...one bai and one gyal ... get select from all over. Now dem learn dat yuh doan do like dem hustlers and pushers and buy yuh degree, fake it, call yuhself doctor scholar like abie Minista of Education, and fake degree and tek nuff, nuff kickback foh build big mansion after yuh get minista wuk 2 years. 

Dem pickneys will never be pushers and hustlers. Hey hey hey...

Labba posted:

 Now dem learn dat yuh doan do like dem hustlers and pushers and buy yuh degree, fake it, call yuhself doctor scholar like abie Minista of Education, and fake degree and tek nuff, nuff kickback foh build big mansion after yuh get minista wuk 2 years.

You zero in on MOE , what happen to the others ??  how about to be Prezi , an individual elected using the MARXIST system .

Bhai, me sign up pun the Academia edu website ,getting reminders to check out nuff..nuff..papers.

Here is wan quote, from a paper i am reading , have to dig in more on the second paragraph.

https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Found-c1.PDF

Historically,Marxists have generally been reluctant to systematically argue for these moral commitments.

Marx himself felt that talk about “justice” and “morality” was unnecessary and perhaps even pernicious, believing that ideas about morality really just reflected material conditions and interests of actors.

Rather than defend socialism on grounds of social justice or other normative principles, Marx preferred to simply argue that socialism was in the interests of the working class.

Django posted:

Labba posted:

 Now dem learn dat yuh doan do like dem hustlers and pushers and buy yuh degree, fake it, call yuhself doctor scholar like abie Minista of Education, and fake degree and tek nuff, nuff kickback foh build big mansion after yuh get minista wuk 2 years.

You zero in on MOE , what happen to the others ??  how about to be Prezi , an individual elected using the MARXIST system .

Bhai, me sign up pun the Academia edu website ,getting reminders to check out nuff..nuff..papers.

Here is wan quote, from a paper i am reading , have to dig in more on the second paragraph.

https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Found-c1.PDF

Historically,Marxists have generally been reluctant to systematically argue for these moral commitments.

Marx himself felt that talk about “justice” and “morality” was unnecessary and perhaps even pernicious, believing that ideas about morality really just reflected material conditions and interests of actors.

Rather than defend socialism on grounds of social justice or other normative principles, Marx preferred to simply argue that socialism was in the interests of the working class.

Hey hey hey...