Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
Home > TOP STORY > Preliminary census results show population figure at 747,884 in 2012
Preliminary census results show population figure at 747,884 in 2012

Preliminary census results show population figure at 747,884 in 2012

 

…a marginal reduction of 3,339 in 2002

THE population of Guyana, counted on September 15, 2012, Census Day, was recorded at 747,884, according to a preliminary report of the Guyana Population and Housing Census, 2012, released yesterday morning at the Guyana Convention Centre, Liliendaal, Greater Georgetown. This data shows that there has been a marginal reduction of 3,339 persons from the population count of 751,223 that was recorded in 2002.
According to census 2012, Guyana’s coastland population stands at 666,261 persons. This count reflects the reality of the greatest concentration of Guyana’s population living within the coastland regions.
Although, the Coastal Plain represents the smallest physical geographic area of Guyana, it includes six of the ten administrative regions. The heavily populated zone boasts the majority of commercial activities being conducted in the country.
Both previous and current censuses have revealed that Demerara-Mahaica (Region 4), among the six administrative regions of the coastal bloc, holds the largest proportion of the population. This was closely followed by Region 6 (East Berbice- Corentyne) and Region 3 (Essequibo Islands-West Demerara). Region 10 (Upper Demerara-Upper Berbice) was recorded as the least populated area of the regions within the coastal bloc.

Hinterland Population
The population in the hinterland regions at present stands at 81,623 persons, which represent 10.9 percent of the total population.
In absolute terms, the population of the hinterland bloc has increased significantly. This increase was recorded possibly because of the increase in mining activities, to which migrant workers from other regions in Guyana have relocated for economic gains.
The hinterland regions of Guyana are recorded as comprising approximately two-thirds (approximately 145,353km2) of the land area of Guyana. They include Region 1 (Barima-Waini), Region 7 (Cuyuni-Mazaruni), Region 8 (Potaro-Siparuni), and Region 9 (Upper Takutu-Upper Essequibo).
Urban-Rural Distribution
Generally, the population has declined in the urban areas and continues to do so. Urban distribution refers to segments of the population that are found within the urban centres and settlements. The difference in the figures reflects a decrease in the urban population to 26.4 percent, when compared to the 2002 census of 28.4 percent.
According to reports, 202,992 urban dwellers were recorded in 2002, compared to 191,810 in 2012. Of the total number of rural settlers in 2002 and 2012, there was a record of 528,323 rural dwellers in 2002 and 535,193 in 2012.
On the whole, the report indicated a recorded decline in the urban population. This decline seems to be the main reason behind the overall population decline. The urban population comprised 28.4 percent of the total population in 2002, which has reduced to 26.4 percent of the total population in 2012.
Urban townships/city
The urban townships including the capital City of Georgetown recorded a population reduction of 18,182, with a total population of 191,810 at Census 2012, down from 209,992 in the 2002 census.
This number implies that 191,810 of the total enumerated household population, reported in 2012, live in urban areas as compared to 535,193 rural resident dwellers.
The overall reduction has obviously been influenced by the outward shift of the population of Georgetown, which comprises about two-thirds of the urban population to new housing schemes established, outside the city limits during the census period.
Linden in Region 10 (Upper Demerara- Upper Berbice) was recorded with a size of 27,277 currently, down from 29,232 in 2002. The township of Rose Hall accounted for the least, with a population of 5,662.

Household Size
For the 2012 census, the number of households recorded was 210,124 – this figure included 732 households which were not available for interview. With the exception of Region 6, the other regions had recorded significant increases in the number of households.
The subsequent increase in the number of the households along with the decline in the population had resulted in the decrease of the average household size.
Household is a basic residential unit in which economic production and consumption, inheritance, child rearing, and shelter are organised and carried out.

Dwelling Units
The number of dwellings was reported as 221,741 in the 2012 census. This figure has increased by 16,624, when compared to the 2002 census figure of 205,117 dwelling units. Of the total dwelling units, 214,999 were occupied, while the combination of vacant and closed dwellings totalled 6,742.
Gender/Sex Ratio
Females slightly outnumbered males in the 2012 census. There were 372,547 males and 375,337 females, thus giving an estimated sex ratio of 99 males per every 100 females in the 2012 census as compared to almost equal number of males and females (100.2) recorded in the 2002 results.
At the regional level, hinterland regions (Regions 1, 7, 8 and 9) showed high sex ratios, that is, more males than females when compared to the coastland regions. Particularly, Regions 7 and 8 reported extremely high sex ratios throughout the census periods.
Region 4 demonstrated the lowest gender ratio, ranging from as low as 93 males in 1991 and gradually increasing to 96 males per 100 females in 2012. The report noted that the disparities could be due to male migration or other associated population factors, but an independent study would be need to conclude this.

National Building Stocks
The national building stocks, measured as the total number of buildings regardless of the use, stands at present at 219,509. This reflects an increase from 187,696 in 2002. These figures represent an increase of 16.9 percent or by an absolute of 31,813 buildings, when compared to the number of buildings in the country ten years ago.
Government policy of making land available for home construction as well as increase in the development of both government and private housing schemes was seen as the main reason for the growth. The impact of this policy has been observed in the last five to six years prior to the census.
One of the key indicators often used in the assessment of the national economy performance is the Construction Sector. The primary focus of this sector is the construction of buildings for both private and commercial uses in the local economy.
The least number of buildings are reported in the hinterland regions (Regions 1, 7, 8 and 9). However, temporary camp dwellings were recorded as buildings since census surveys were also administered in logging and mining camps.
The Preliminary Results of the 2012 Guyana Population & Housing Census provide both a summary and profile of the population by regions.
Information contained in the report is further broken down and classified by coastland and hinterland regions, as well as urban and rural areas.
The report provides comprehensive information on population size (coastland and hinterland), urban and rural population distributions, the size of the capital city and urban townships, the size of dwelling units, gender/sex ratio, and national building stocks.
The “total population size” includes the number of persons who were contacted at their places of residence. According to the report, 727,003 persons were counted as being part of the “enumerated household population” as those persons directly accounted for by the enumerators.
The remaining 6,872 persons were counted as forming the institutional population. These include those who were stationed in retirement homes, school dormitories, as well as the homeless and incarcerated. A figure of 14,009 was estimated to be the number of persons who were not contacted.

(Derwayne Wills)

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

And some  PNC supporters ate grass and walked around with tear clothes but always voted for Burnham and Hoyte. 

You know this for a fact. According to the census how many are still doing this?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

And some  PNC supporters ate grass and walked around with tear clothes but always voted for Burnham and Hoyte. 

You know this for a fact. According to the census how many are still doing this?

 

Mits

 

PNC supporters did so during Dictators Burnham and Hoyte's days. Census does not provide results on voting patterns.

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

And some  PNC supporters ate grass and walked around with tear clothes but always voted for Burnham and Hoyte. 

You know this for a fact. According to the census how many are still doing this?

asK cARUIBJ.   He will have no problem confirming dat.

Nehru
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

And some  PNC supporters ate grass and walked around with tear clothes but always voted for Burnham and Hoyte. 

You know this for a fact. According to the census how many are still doing this?

 

Mits

 

PNC supporters did so during Dictators Burnham and Hoyte's days. Census does not provide results on voting patterns.

These supporters are primarily black folks. I thought you were wheening yourself from this kind of racists remarks. I have never seen black people eating grass. Many bought food on credit from us. None ever robbed us.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

And some  PNC supporters ate grass and walked around with tear clothes but always voted for Burnham and Hoyte. 

You know this for a fact. According to the census how many are still doing this?

asK cARUIBJ.   He will have no problem confirming dat.

you fellas need to start freeing yourselves from racists slavery. Is the PPP/C only for the East Indians?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

And some  PNC supporters ate grass and walked around with tear clothes but always voted for Burnham and Hoyte. 

You know this for a fact. According to the census how many are still doing this?

 

Mits

 

PNC supporters did so during Dictators Burnham and Hoyte's days. Census does not provide results on voting patterns.

It take a racial mine like Mr Kishan B, Mr Teekah, Mr Rev and Mr Jalil to make a statement like that. Only last week Rodney commision show that many black people fight mr Burnham. Some get jail, beat up and kill. Some in army ready to take on Mr Burnham. Rodney enquiry show WPA get support in army. You sick Mr Yuji. 

FM

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Mr Teekah is a scamp man but he say true about census. SN report that Region 6 population drop 14,264. You want bet 10000 is Indos? They scampishness against the Indos coming back to bite them. Good for them. That is 2 seat PPP lost right there. 

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. Under this dictator everything was rigged. How about the thousands who fled his dictatorship era ?

 

Mits, you are now defending the PNC ?

 

Guyana's population shrunk by a whopping 3,300 from 2002 to 2012. Canada depends on immigrants for population growth. No big news here.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. Under this dictator everything was rigged. How about the thousands who fled his dictatorship era.

 

Mits, you are now defending the PNC ?

Mr Yuji that is not true. Mr do the census. How you think we know Indos was 50% in 1992? 

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. Under this dictator everything was rigged. How about the thousands who fled his dictatorship era.

 

Mits, you are now defending the PNC ?

No. This census is comparing 2002 to 2012. Why is the population shrinking under the PPP regime? You cannot fix it if you do not know what is bruck in the system.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. Under this dictator everything was rigged. How about the thousands who fled his dictatorship era.

 

Mits, you are now defending the PNC ?

Mr Yuji that is not true. Mr do the census. How you think we know Indos was 50% in 1992? 

 

TK/Jumbie

 

Yuji will not waste his time responding to your PNC nonsense.

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. Under this dictator everything was rigged. How about the thousands who fled his dictatorship era.

 

Mits, you are now defending the PNC ?

No. This census is comparing 2002 to 2012. Why is the population shrinking under the PPP regime? You cannot fix it if you do not know what is bruck in the system.

 

Big news, the population shrunk by 3,300. Mits, it would serve you better if you actually took some time to read the report.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. Under this dictator everything was rigged. How about the thousands who fled his dictatorship era.

 

Mits, you are now defending the PNC ?

Mr Yuji that is not true. Mr do the census. How you think we know Indos was 50% in 1992? 

 

TK/Jumbie

 

Yuji will not waste his time responding to your PNC nonsense.

You cant win me. So you like imagine I am Mr TK. Me can stan on me own. Try debate me if you is a man. 

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Please do try to derail this thread. It is about Brian Teekha misleading posters about the census results.

 

Voting patterns based on race is a political reality in Guyana, it is no secret.

 

I do not have answer when it it will end. I can say this, the current politicians in Guyana will not solve this problem and it includes the PPP, AFC and PNC.

Why did the population shrink under the PPP/C regime?

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. Under this dictator everything was rigged. How about the thousands who fled his dictatorship era ?

 

Mits, you are now defending the PNC ?

 

Guyana's population shrunk by a whopping 3,300 from 2002 to 2012. Canada depends on immigrants for population growth. No big news here.

Unlike USA, Canada is opening its door primarily to the educated. Family unit sponsoring takes a back seat. This is seen by lack of embassies in certain parts of the world.

Why did you making statement the black people were eating grass? Black people grow food in the upper Canje Creek and sold to my parents who would supply them in turn with ration and clothes. 

Mitwah

Mits, it appears that you are fine with Carib attacking Indos. Read the original post. 

 

This thread is about the misleading post that Brian Teekha posted about the population. This census spells bad news for the Useless opposition who can talk all day long. I live by one standard, Talk is Cheap.

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

14,000 were not contacted. It is all a wash when we take all factors into consideration.

How many were not contacted in 2002? It's not a wash. More than 10K was not accounted for in a PPP stronghold. That means an automatic loss of 1 seat. I guess it's indifferent to you. Did black people really eat grass?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Mits, it appears that you are fine with Carib attacking Indos. Read the original post. 

 

This thread is about the misleading post that Brian Teekha posted about the population. This census spells bad news for the Useless opposition who can talk all day long. I live by one standard, Talk is Cheap.

 

 

 Don't you find it strange that a census completed in 2012 can't to this date give results on employment, unemployment and the racial breakdown of the population? Why is the PPP not releasing this info? Do you now see why they don't want Local Government Elections?

 

 

Mitwah

Mits

 

To be realistic, the AFC will not make any significant inroads for the Local Elections. They will be embarrassed at Local Elections. I am putting forward an honest assessment.

 

It may appear that the PPP is buying time so that they win the Local Elections. Interesting times ahead.

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

Mits

 

To be realistic, the AFC will not make any significant inroads for the Local Elections. They will be embarrassed at Local Elections. I am putting forward an honest assessment.

 

It may appear that the PPP is buying time so that they win the Local Elections. Interesting times ahead.

 

 

Berbicans are fed up with the empty promises from the PPP. Look at Edinburgh. Apart from the shrinking Indo population, who are the main supporters of the PPP, many Berbicians will stay away from the polls in protest. Jagdeo used the commissioning of the roads leading to the bridge to win votes. Berbicians were not aware of the high tolls to line the pockets of his friends. The Berbice bridge would come back to bite the PPP in the butt.

Mitwah

We will have to wait for the election results.

 

Gerhard's departure from the AFC is another major blow combined with allegations of lack of accountability for funds will hurt the AFC.

 

As usual, it will be a horse race between the PPP and PNC. The AFC made too many blunders to recover, their support is dwindling. As usual, I will continue to provide an honest assessment that may cause pain to some but the truth must be told.

 

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

We will have to wait for the election results.

 

Gerhard's departure from the AFC is another major blow combined with allegations of lack of accountability for funds will hurt the AFC.

 

As usual, it will be a horse race between the PPP and PNC. The AFC made too many blunders to recover, their support is dwindling. As usual, I will continue to provide an honest assessment that may cause pain to some but the truth must be told.

 

Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
.

 

 I will say this again, the opposition is useless. I predict a PPP majority. They (opposition) can talk and talk is cheap. 

 

The opposition lacks cohesive leadership and direction. My only fear is that the AFC will be wiped off the political map. I still want to see a third party in place. I spoke to someone in Berbice last night and they told me that the the PPP has been working 24/7 in East Berbice, Corentyne.

 

I am deeply disappointed in the useless opposition. Where is the no confidence vote ? 

 

 

Ramotar has the charisma of a crapaud.  People see the PPP as corrupt.  I will argue that NONE of the parties, inclusive of the PPP, enjoys enthusiastic support from most Guyanese.

 

What is noteworthy is that prior to the 2011 the PPP maniacs screamed a 60% victory.  Now they babble 55%.  Even they know that the PPP has lost support, even as the opposition parties remain inept.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by yuji22:

14,000 were not contacted. It is all a wash when we take all factors into consideration.

What this shows is that Berbice is hell and Berbicians will prefer to live near G/town, or better yet, not in Guyana at all.

 

Guyana's population is moving to the greater G/town area and to the interior.  This because the agricultural economy can no longer sustain its people.

 

For those who think that they can extrapolate ethnic numbers based on population changes in regions, there is a possibility that Indians might have over taken Africans in Region 4 if many of these Berbicians left Region 6 for that region.

 

Similarly Region 7 might have become more African as some left Region 10 to live there.

 

The sharp improvement in Region 3 does suggest that there are now more Africans and mixed people living there, maybe from G/town.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

14,000 were not contacted. It is all a wash when we take all factors into consideration.

What this shows is that Berbice is hell and Berbicians will prefer to live near G/town, or better yet, not in Guyana at all.

 

Guyana's population is moving to the greater G/town area and to the interior.  This because the agricultural economy can no longer sustain its people.

 

For those who think that they can extrapolate ethnic numbers based on population changes in regions, there is a possibility that Indians might have over taken Africans in Region 4 if many of these Berbicians left Region 6 for that region.

 

Similarly Region 7 might have become more African as some left Region 10 to live there.

 

The sharp improvement in Region 3 does suggest that there are now more Africans and mixed people living there, maybe from G/town.

Carib with his usual if, but and maybe.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

14,000 were not contacted. It is all a wash when we take all factors into consideration.

What this shows is that Berbice is hell and Berbicians will prefer to live near G/town, or better yet, not in Guyana at all.

 

Guyana's population is moving to the greater G/town area and to the interior.  This because the agricultural economy can no longer sustain its people.

 

For those who think that they can extrapolate ethnic numbers based on population changes in regions, there is a possibility that Indians might have over taken Africans in Region 4 if many of these Berbicians left Region 6 for that region.

 

Similarly Region 7 might have become more African as some left Region 10 to live there.

 

The sharp improvement in Region 3 does suggest that there are now more Africans and mixed people living there, maybe from G/town.

Carib with his usual if, but and maybe.

I agree with his assessment.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

14,000 were not contacted. It is all a wash when we take all factors into consideration.

What this shows is that Berbice is hell and Berbicians will prefer to live near G/town, or better yet, not in Guyana at all.

 

Guyana's population is moving to the greater G/town area and to the interior.  This because the agricultural economy can no longer sustain its people.

 

For those who think that they can extrapolate ethnic numbers based on population changes in regions, there is a possibility that Indians might have over taken Africans in Region 4 if many of these Berbicians left Region 6 for that region.

 

Similarly Region 7 might have become more African as some left Region 10 to live there.

 

The sharp improvement in Region 3 does suggest that there are now more Africans and mixed people living there, maybe from G/town.

Carib with his usual if, but and maybe.

So yuji any comments.  You seem to know a lot.

 

Or is it that you can only scream what FreeDUMB house tells you to wail?

 

All the chatter about housing and they cant even tell us how many Guyanese have access to modern plumbing, this being a major problem 10 years ago when the majority of Guyanese didn't.

 

I would think that this would be more important than telling us what the density of Region 4 is.  We all know that it is the most dense region in the country, so what use is that?

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
 

I agree with his assessment.

Yuji is in deep depression that Guyana is evolving away from a rural peasant based society.  This doesn't bode well for the PPP.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 

Burnham did not provide us with census results. 

 

yuji, please do your research before making a false statement like this.

Burnham's PNC ruled Guyana from 1964 to 1992.

During the PNC regime, national census was taken 3 times as follows:

1970: population 701,718

1980: population 759,567

1991: population 723,673

You will notice that the 1970 and 1980 census occurred during Burnham's rule and the 1991 census occurred during Hoyte's rule.

Source: Statistical Bureau, Guyana

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×