Skip to main content

Late Guyanese President Forbes Burnham is to be honoured by the South African government with the Oliver Tambo Award

The award, established in 2002, is conferred on foreign nationals (Heads of State and Government) and other foreign dignitaries for friendship shown to South Africa. During the 1970s and 1980s, under Burnham’s leadership Guyana played a leading role among third world countries in opposing apartheid in South Africa and helping liberation movements in southern Africa.

The following press release was today issued on behalf of his family:
“Ms. Roxane Van West Charles will be traveling to Johannesburg, South Africa to accept the Oliver Tambo Award (Gold), which was conferred on her father, the late President L F S Burnham by President Zuma. She will be accompanied by her sister, Dr. Francesca Onu, and her husband, Dr. Richard Van West Charles. The award ceremony will take place on the 27th April.

“The Order of the Companion of OR Tambo is a South African honour which was established on the 6th December 2002 and is granted by the President of South Africa to foreign citizens who have “promoted South African interests and aspirations through cooperation, solidarity, and support.” In the letter from the South African government dated the 12th March and addressed to Ms. Roxane Van West Charles, it is stated that the award was conferred on Mr. Burnham “…. for his integral part in sport boycott against South Africa during the apartheid regime and support for the liberation movement and freedom fighters in South Africa.”

“In the meantime, a spokesman for the Burnham family has pointed out that the success of Mr. Burnham’s policies on the Liberation of Southern Afirca in general, and South Africa in particular, is a matter of public record. For this reason, among others, he expressed the view that his political, diplomatic and material contribution to the struggle for the termination of colonialism in Africa and the liberation of the states in the southern part of the continent is unarguable. As a student in London, Mr. Burnham embraced the idea that the African continent must be liberated and worked along with his fellow West Indians and African students and intellectuals towards this goal. On his return to Guyana, Mr. Burnham made this an essential platform of his Party, the People’s National Congress, which was formed in 1957. Symbolic of his commitment to the liberation of the African continent, Mr Burnham and his political colleagues decided to celebrate “Ghana Day” in commemoration of the independence of Ghana, the first African country to win its independence after the end of the Second World War. Relatedly, there was a programmatic and sustained effort to educate the Guyanese public about the evolution events in Southern Africa.

“And in this very period, Mr. Burnham delivered what some consider his best speech to local legislature when he spoke for several days to support the argument for the isolation of the apartheid regime in South Africa. He also signaled the unrelenting opposition of himself and his Party to the apartheid regime and all of its works.

“As Prime Minister and later President of Guyana the policy of opposition to colonialism and oppression in Southern Africa and the liberation of their peoples was firmly maintained and sustained. This was given expression at the nonaligned Summit in Lusaka Zambia, in 1970, when Mr. Burnham announced that Guyana would make an annual contribution to the fight for the liberation of Southern Africa. On World Solidarity day on May 25, 1975, Mr. Burnham explained the policy of offering material assistance to the liberation movements in Southern Africa:

“`We give because we considered it our duty to give. We gave not only because to some of us, the Africans are blood brothers, but also because we were convinced, and still are convinced, that so long as imperialism wonders abroad in any part of the world, our own hard-won freedom is at stake.’
“This was complemented by the award of scholarships to African students to educational institutions in Guyana and an active foreign policy, carried out in concert with other like-minded states, which was geared towards isolating the apartheid regime in South Africa, particularly in sports, and the sustaining political support for the liberation movements. The family spokesman also indicated that Mr. Burnham, in carrying out his policies in Southern Africa and elsewhere on the continent was ably assisted by his then Foreign Minister, Mr. Rashleigh Jackson, his Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Mr. Noel Sinclair, and several others, too numerous to mention. In particular, the policies were executed by an efficient Foreign Ministry which possessed at this time some of the finest diplomatic offices the country has known.

“But it was the decision to allow Cuban planes to land in Guyana in 1975 which demonstrated Mr. Burnham’s exceptional courage and support for the liberation of the Southern Africa. The presence of Cuban troops in Angola not only tilted the balance of forces in favour of the true fighters for freedom but also changed the strategic equation in Southern and hastened the liberation of several states in that part of the continent. The liberation of Angola and Mozambique, among other factors, were consequential in the eventual birth of freedom in South Africa itself.”

http://www.stabroeknews.com/20...-oliver-tambo-award/

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by raymond:

Congrats to the late great LFSB...one of the sons of Guyana


That is exactly like a Jew saying CONGRATS to Hitler, one of the sons of Germany.

I can't dismiss your analogy Pavi, but the South Africans look only at who contributed to their liberation from apartheid (both Burnham and Jagan were active in this area), and would only devalue this with obvious undemocratic actions at home. Would they count Burnham's rule as like Hitler or Pol Pot? Stretching it anotheer way, would the Palestinian Authority, say after Statehood, be blamed for giving the Jordanian King Abdullah a high honor and award even though he maintains relations with Israel? My point is look at things in context and not be persuaded by dislike for Burnham. This fight is not worth it.

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by raymond:

Congrats to the late great LFSB...one of the sons of Guyana


That is exactly like a Jew saying CONGRATS to Hitler, one of the sons of Germany.

I can't dismiss your analogy Pavi, but the South Africans look only at who contributed to their liberation from apartheid (both Burnham and Jagan were active in this area), and would only devalue this with obvious undemocratic actions at home. Would they count Burnham's rule as like Hitler or Pol Pot? Stretching it anotheer way, would the Palestinian Authority, say after Statehood, be blamed for giving the Jordanian King Abdullah a high honor and award even though he maintains relations with Israel? My point is look at things in context and not be persuaded by dislike for Burnham. This fight is not worth it.

I am not fighting Bhai. It is indeed an anology. Robin Hood was a Thief, I would rather Honor him.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by raymond:

Congrats to the late great LFSB...one of the sons of Guyana


That is exactly like a Jew saying CONGRATS to Hitler, one of the sons of Germany.

I can't dismiss your analogy Pavi, but the South Africans look only at who contributed to their liberation from apartheid (both Burnham and Jagan were active in this area), and would only devalue this with obvious undemocratic actions at home. Would they count Burnham's rule as like Hitler or Pol Pot? Stretching it anotheer way, would the Palestinian Authority, say after Statehood, be blamed for giving the Jordanian King Abdullah a high honor and award even though he maintains relations with Israel? My point is look at things in context and not be persuaded by dislike for Burnham. This fight is not worth it.

De fella was in the bowels of the Jagans-he full of shyte.

S
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by raymond:

Congrats to the late great LFSB...one of the sons of Guyana


That is exactly like a Jew saying CONGRATS to Hitler, one of the sons of Germany.

dude...if he was like Hitler, you would not be around

FM

He did play a positive role in in SA and other areas in Africa.

 

If they feel he deserved to be recognized then let it be so known.

 

He was a High Profiled Guyanese.

 

One more for Fat-Boy

Vish M
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by raymond:

Congrats to the late great LFSB...one of the sons of Guyana


That is exactly like a Jew saying CONGRATS to Hitler, one of the sons of Germany.

Hitler was not German. And Burnham did not murder any PPP supporter.

Mr.T

Burnham, like many leaders on the African continent demanded one man one vote in South Africa while denying their own people that same right in their respective nations. This is what made Burnham's anti-apartheid rhetoric hypocritical.

 

Billy Ram Balgobin

One man one vote in Guyana has thrown up an anomaly. The indians in Guyana are breeding as fast as rabbits, which means that the country is now awash with thieving PPP indians who don't care about anyone else. A perfect storm in which Hitler managed to find a way to cull the jews. It is not difficult to see that if the PPP continues on its racial hatred path, the local indian population are crating a slaughter house situation for themselves. The blacks won't rest till they have culled the indian population in order to restore their chances to win a race based election process.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Mr.T:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by raymond:

Congrats to the late great LFSB...one of the sons of Guyana


That is exactly like a Jew saying CONGRATS to Hitler, one of the sons of Germany.

Hitler was not German. And Burnham did not murder any PPP supporter.

Hitler was born in Austria.

 

While the noted political killings under the Burnham regime were mostly people sympathetic to the WPA, I wonder which party the two who were killed in 1973 at the Corentyne toll-booth belonged to?

Kari
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

We don't have such questions with regards to the slaying of Sawh. The PPP complicity in taking out one of its own requires no further acknowledgement.

T.....I was only addressing the two things you said - Hitler was not a German - true; and Burnham did not murder any PPP supporter - which is a questionable "truth". Whey de backside Sawh's killing come into this discussion? Oh, yyes, I see, as a deflection of the error that Burnham did not kill any PPP supporter.

Kari

Kari you always full of excuses. When you gonna man up that the current ill health that is sweeping across most of Guyana, but has passed the PPP croonies is entirely the making of the PPP. Twenty years of terror rule has cowed blacks and bucks into retreat. Not even during the darkest days under Burnham were citizens so afraid of their lives. Where cutlass was once used to settle scores, the PPP has managed to replace it with AK-47 military assault weapons. Burnham was bad. But Jagdeo under the PPP became evil. And that evil streak has now installed a sense of invincibility and a disregard for the law into every PPP regime member.

Mr.T

Nobody claiming it is bad to clean out filth. But Sawh was a good man.

jagdeo imported hard core criminals from the US to then place Guyana on the map as a drugs outlet. He sold out RK to the US when it was clear that RK was getting bigger than him.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Cobra:

As much as we may dislike Burnham, he's a historic figure in his own right in Guyana, and the role he played in South Africa. Let the man receive his award.  

On this one I have to agree with you.

Chief
Originally Posted by Billy Ram Balgobin:

Burnham, like many leaders on the African continent demanded one man one vote in South Africa while denying their own people that same right in their respective nations. This is what made Burnham's anti-apartheid rhetoric hypocritical.

 

Well said!!

Chief
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

Kari you always full of excuses. .

Excuses for what?

 

I'll repeat and will do so in a crystal-clear manner.

 

  • Hitler was born in Austria, so he was not a German - you are correct.
  • Under Burnham those toll-both people who were killed were PPP supporters. So you were wrong to say that no PPP supporters were killed under Burnham.

What in the world the above has to do with me making excuses? Where did I ever say I will address what went on under Jagdeo? So what is this about me not man-ing up?

 

Can you for once respond to what I replied to? You can then engage me on killings under Jagdeo's rule. Fair enough?

Kari

None of the current crop of PNC leaders have ever acknowledged the wrong deeds of LFS Burnham. They continue to brainwash their supporters that he was a flawless human being who governed democratically.

Billy Ram Balgobin
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

Burnham allowed at least one vote per man. He did not deny any men a vote.

Boy, you are so naive. Go suck on an awara

Those are the facts of the matter. Only a fool like you would dare deny that Burnham did not use multiple vote registration for many of his supporters. This technique was hastily adapted by the PPP in recent elections.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Billy Ram Balgobin:

None of the current crop of PNC leaders have ever acknowledged the wrong deeds of LFS Burnham. They continue to brainwash their supporters that he was a flawless human being who governed democratically.

You can't even get the PPP supporters to do like wise. So what's your point?

Mr.T

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×