Skip to main content

http://www.stabroeknews.com/20...ections-legislation/

 

Candidates Ramotar and Anthony violated an express provision of the elections legislation

 

May 5, 2015

 

Dear Editor,

Section 67 of the Representation of the People Act provides that the election agent of each group of candidates may appoint one of the candidates as its duly appointed candidate to attend the poll at a polling place. The election agent must do so in writing and deliver it to the returning officer of the district not later than seven days before the election day. Only one person may be so appointed for any one polling place.

The presence of candidates Mr. Donald Ramotar and Dr. Frank Anthony of the PPP/C at Camp Ayanganna on May 2, 2015, reportedly observing the voting of the army personnel, is a violation of the Act. As if that was not bad enough, Mr. Ramotar’s attendance in his Party colours was naked electioneering at a place of polling, which is also forbidden. And then to top it all here, candidate Ramotar is permitted to handle and examine what looks suspiciously like the voters list for that polling place.

GECOM, unreasonably in my view, last week decided to deny citizens the right to vote if they choose to do a conflicting duty to assist the elections process as party agents. Yet is it willing to tolerate and close its eyes to the picture of candidates Ramotar and Anthony violating an express provision of the elections legislation and engaging in politicking at a place of poll. The presiding officer should have excluded at least one, if not both candidates and advised them that they had no lawful business there.

I hope that this will not be repeated come May 11.

 

Yours faithfully, 
Christopher Ram

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

Ram must be wan rale fuss year law student mekkin rookie mistakes otherwise he would know that Section 67 contemplates Election Day poll sites not the sites utilized by the Disciplined Forces to cast their ballots.

 

For the purposes of the law, "poll sites" means poll sites on Election Day.

Do you have a copy of the aforementioned Section 67 that you can post? I'd like to read it for myself and see what it says. Thanks.

Mars
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

Ram must be wan rale fuss year law student mekkin rookie mistakes otherwise he would know that Section 67 contemplates Election Day poll sites not the sites utilized by the Disciplined Forces to cast their ballots.

 

For the purposes of the law, "poll sites" means poll sites on Election Day.

Do you have a copy of the aforementioned Section 67 that you can post? I'd like to read it for myself and see what it says. Thanks.

 

I know it's impossible fuh wan Putagee/third class white to believe wan coolie man can read hinglish lil good and to boot wan big big law at dat but lemme assure yuh that it is possible. Abbe ah haccomplish dis feat hevery day chap.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×