Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

CANU says wrongfully named in gold seizure, detention of NY-bound passenger

 

The Customs Anti Narcotics Unit (CANU) Friday night refuted claims in a High Court action filed by an outgoing Guyanese passenger to New York that its agents seized jewellery and detained him for four hours resulting in him missing his flight.

CANU Head, James Singh said none of his anti-drug agents was involved in the seizure of jewellery from Richard Ramjit at the Cheddi Jagan International Airport on January 19, 2016. “This has nothing to do with CANU. This is a police matter, not my unit. We had nothing to do with it,” he told Demerara Waves Online News.

He said the law enforcement agent, Travis Leitch, is instead a member of the Guyana Police Force’s Criminal Investigations Department (CID). “I don’t have anybody by the name of Leitch working at my agency. Leitch is police,” he said. “In no way was CANU involved in this matter nor did any CANU rank seize any jewellery, detain any individual or anything like that whatsoever,” said Singh.

“CANU would like to state that the officers who identified themselves as CANU officers, are not members the unit, nor were they ever members of the unit. Furthermore, no CANU Officer was involved in that operation at any time. CANU officers on duty are uniformed and display their issued Identification card with their names,” he said.

But the passenger’s lawyer, Anil Nandlall, insisted that the agent who conducted the seizure is a CANU officer.

“A CANU officer seized the man’s thing and handed it over to SOCU (Special Organised Crime Unit). We now understand that the jewellery is kept at SOCU so I don’t know what a CANU officer was doing checking for smuggled gold or trying to enforce the AML/CFT (Anti Money Laundering and Countering of Financing Terrorism) Act,” he said. Nandlall said Ramjit asked the agent his name and he told him that he was Leitch and that he was a CANU officer, a portfolio he confirmed with CID.

Demerara Waves Online News was told that the jewellery was worth US$15,000, above the US$10,000 ceiling at which police and customs could seize and probe under Guyana’s revised financial crimes law.

Nandlall said Leitch took his client on the CJIA tarmac and used a sniffer dog to sniff his client.

Ramjit’s lawyers said the seizure of the jewellery violates Ramjit’s fundamental right and freedom not to have his property compulsorily taken possession of without the prompt payment of adequate compensation as is guaranteed to him by Article 142 of the Constitution of Guyana.

Ramjit says his arrest and detention for more than four hours at the Cheddie Jagan International Airport, Timehri contravened his fundamental right to personal liberty which is guaranteed to him by Article 139 of the Constitution of Guyana and that such detention was unlawful and contrary to the his right to leave Guyana which is guaranteed to him by Article 148 of the Constitution of Guyana.

He also wants the High Court to find that his detention and and seizure of his property and the failure refusal and/or omission of the said officers of the Customs Anti-Narcotics Unit to extend the same treatment to other passengers who wore similar and larger quantity of jewellery  and who were on the same flight or on different flights at or about the same time at the Cheddie Jagan International Airport, Timehri, constitutes a violation of the protection against discriminatory treatment which is guaranteed to the Applicant by Article 149 of the Constitution of Guyana.

The Constitutional Motion was filed on the 21st day of January, 2016, and is fixed for hearing in the constitutional court on the 15th day of February, 2016.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

No CANU officer was involved – James Singh

CJIA detention, gold seizure

Head of the Customs Anti-Narcotics Unit (CANU) James Singh said none of the ranks of his unit were

Head of CANU James Singh

Head of CANU James Singh

involved in the operation in which a local businessman was detained and jewellery confiscated at the Cheddi Jagan International Airport (CJIA) last week.
Businessman Richard Ramjit, a goldsmith of Better Hope, East Coast Demerara, claimed he was detained four hours at the airport and two pieces of his gold and silver jewellery, a necklace and a band valued some $4 million, were seized by CANU.
The businessman said that on Tuesday as he was checking-in at the airline counter for his flight to New York, a person in civilian clothes approached him indicating that he is a CANU officer and wanted to search his suitcases. The officer also questioned him, the businessman said.
Ramjit added that after being questioned by two officers in a room, he was allowed to proceed to the Departure Longue but shortly after, he was detained again and accused of trying to smuggle gold, which he denied. The man said he was then taken on the tarmac where his checked-in suitcase was opened in the presence of the other passengers.
“This officer then demanded that I hand over to him the said neckwear and wrist band; I did so and I have not seen either pieces of jewellery since. This officer also requested that I report the following morning to the Special Organized Crime Unit (SOCU) at Camp Street, Georgetown.”
However, Singh in a statement Saturday categorically denied that any of his officers were involved in the operation.
“CANU would like to state that the officers who identified themselves as CANU officers, are not members of the unit, nor were they ever members of the unit. Furthermore, no CANU Officer was involved in that operation at any time,” CANU head declared.
Singh went on to outline that while CANU officers on duty are indeed “uniformed”, they however have on display their issued Identification Card from the Unit with their names.
Following Tuesday’s incident, the businessman filed a $10 million lawsuit against government since the officers would have acted under the new Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Amendment passed by the David Granger-led administration last year.
This incident has brought to the fore concerns about how potential travellers will be affected by this new legislation, which allows designated officers to seize cash and jewellery in excess of US$10,000.
Former Legal Affairs Minister cum Attorney General, Anil Nandlall, who is representing the businessman, said he had pointed this out in Parliament during debate on the amendments but was ignored.
The Notice of Motion filed on Thursday is scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2016.
According to Ramjit in the legal documents, when he was eventually released the flight had already left, causing him a loss of US$750 for his ticket and a further G$400,000 for items he was supposed to buy and resell to make a profit.
In addition to asking the court to grant an order for his jewellery to be returned, the businessman is also asking for “damages in excess of $10,000,000 for breach of his fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of Guyana”.

FM

This is very troubling as the airport continues to be a place where afc/apnu supporters in customs/police can steal from citizens.  Over the years even under the PPP this practice of stealing from travelers was common place. It is no different now under the afc/apnu as they are even bolder now that their leader Granger is in office. 

FM

The passenger is not complaining that his jewellery was stolen. He complaining that it was seized, even though he was trying to take out more than is allowed. So he is guilty. What's the issue?

Mr.T
Mr.T posted:

The passenger is not complaining that his jewellery was stolen. He complaining that it was seized, even though he was trying to take out more than is allowed. So he is guilty. What's the issue?

Seized/stolen, the same thing. His property will end up in Granger's pockets to sport his supporters. The clear redistribution of wealth from Indians to Afro supporters of the afc/apnu.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×