Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Coalition has restored public systems’ functionality - Minister Bulkan

Written by  , Published in Ministry of Communities, A GINA Feature, May 17, 2016, http://www.gina.gov.gy/home/in...lity-minister-bulkan

Minister of Communities, Ronald Bulkan has stated that meaningful efforts and strides have been made under his ministry, but acknowledged that more needs to be done to improve the services offered to citizens.
Speaking with the Government Information Agency (GINA) on the challenges and achievements of the Ministry over the past year, and the objectives set for the next year, the Minister rationalised the move to establish the Ministry of Communities.
One year ago
A year ago, the A Partnership for National Unity + Alliance For Change (APNU+AFC) Government, amalgamated four sectors; local government, regional development, and housing and water into the Ministry of Communities. Minister Bulkan recalled that it was a signal to the “citizens that the focus of the administration would be on addressing the conditions under which our people live.”
Minister Bulkan noted, the APNU+AFC administration, inherited a “dangerously dysfunctional system of local government. It is no secret that local government election was long overdue…so we had councils in place that had outlived their democratic mandate by almost two decades.”
President David Granger, Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo and Minister of Communities Ronald Bulkan with the new mayors and deputy mayorsPresident David Granger, Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo and Minister of Communities Ronald Bulkan with the new mayors and deputy mayors
 
He also noted that in addition to the non-renewal of the councils, what obtained was a central government that “did not recognise the authority of our local councils nor the role that was prescribed for local government organs as part of public administration.”
He recalled that the central government essentially sought to manage and administer the country from the centre, a move that is in conflict with the country’s constitution. The country was too large, as well, to be effectively managed from the centre.
Minister Bulkan recalled that the coalition came into government with a ‘fundamentally diametrically opposed’ approach to local government than its predecessor.  “When in opposition, we outlined clearly that our constitutional provisions in relation to local democracy, local government and the role of local democratic organs must be respected,” Minister Bulkan noted.
He observed that at its core, the APNU+AFC administration subscribed to those constitutional provisions, which provide for “decentralisation of authority, as well as devolution of power”. That is the programme that the administration has sought to pursue from the beginning of its assumption to office.
One year later
Reflecting on the work of the administration, through his Ministry, one year after assuming office, Minister Bulkan noted that the administration has “restored functionality to the country’s system of public administration, allowing for the effective discharge of the role and the authority of the local government organs.”
The first step in this ‘repair’ process was to ensure the renewal of lives of the local government councils. He noted that this was done by way of the Local Government Elections, which was held on March 18, and which resulted in new councils coming into being with ‘new blood, vitality and energy.”
The expertise that may be lacking among this new core of councillors is where the responsibility of the Ministry comes in, Minister Bulkan explained. This includes providing meaningful support as part of equipping and empowering these new councils to properly enable them to discharge on their responsibilities. He said that the Ministry has quite an aggressive programme of support for the new councils, with a very active programme to provide specific training as it relates to managing and developing  communities.
Therefore, a key aspect of the ministry’s work was to clearly identify the local government organs, (regional, municipal and neighbourhood), that they are the ones which have the constitutional authority to manage and develop their areas.
The ministry’s role is merely to be able to identify the gaps, the weaknesses, and the challenges that are inherent within these organs, and provide the support. Minister Bulkan explained that this is the programme the Ministry is now actively engaged in.
The Ministry also began work on setting-up the autonomous body that will provide oversight for these new councils. Minister Bulkan recalled that the legislation for the Local Government Commission came into being late in 2013, but the body’s operationalisation required a commencement order which was not given, up until the end of the last Parliament.  
The Communities Minister inherited this undertaking, and subsequently provided funding for the Commission’s start-up in the 2016 budget. He explained that the ministry will soon wrap-up the last stage of the process and the commission could become operational by next month.
The Local Government Commission, a constitutional body, will have eight members. It will also be responsible for regulation and staffing, and will oversee, investigate and examine the actions of the councils as stated in the Local Government Commission Act.
Empowerment of the local government organs has also seen focus on the regional and municipal officials. Minister Bulkan recalled that that regional officials were specifically asked by President David Granger to create Plans of Action for Regional Developments (PARDs) for their respective regions. The Minister noted that the Ministry of Communities has played a leading role in supporting the Regional Democratic Councils (RDCs) which have stepped forward to provide the technical and financial resources in the creation of those plans.
He explained that Region Ten has completed its plan and that the “quite ambitious document” is being reviewed by government to determine “how much of it will be adopted and within what timeframe.”
He also pointed out that funding was allocated in the 2016 budget for two other RDCs to complete their PARDs, before the end of the year.
With regards the municipal councils, Minister Bulkan revealed that five of the town councils have already completed their action plan, with the support of the Ministry, working in conjunction with the Caribbean Local Economic Development (CARILED) project.
He explained that as a result of the lack of political will “to allow our local councils to have that responsibility, for managing their respective areas,” those plans were never operationalised.
What the Ministry and CARILED did was to retrieve those plans, and revise them. Minister Bulkan explained that now that the new councils have come into being “they are in the process of doing their own review of these plans because they are the ones who have to take ownership and execute these plans.”
Going forward
Looking forward to the next 12 months, Minister Bulkan said in going forward, there is no room for complacency, and that “we have to try and learn from the mistakes that would have been made in the first year.”
He added that now that “we would have had a firm understanding, and a better working relationship, between and among the new personnel and these new local government organs, I think that our work in the next year ahead would be equally challenging, but I have no doubt that it will be equally rewarding and satisfying,” he said.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Minister of Community, Ronald Bulkan (centre), Minister in the Ministry, Dawn Hastings-Williams (right) and Minister in the Ministry of Social Protection, Keith Scott at an RDC Leadership Forum

FM

"He observed that at its core, the APNU+AFC administration subscribed to those constitutional provisions, which provide for “decentralisation of authority, as well as devolution of power”. That is the programme that the administration has sought to pursue from the beginning of its assumption to office."

If Bulkan really believes in this statement he made, then he never heard of a guy named Harmon.  While I do give credit to them for holding Local Government Elections, I do not believe there has been any “decentralisation of authority, as well as devolution of power”.

In fact, the exact opposite has happened.  The locally elected citizens are powerless, the central government comprising of primarily ex-GDF personnel are moving the country towards a military dictatorship.  And Bulkan knows that!!!!

Bibi Haniffa
Bibi Haniffa posted:

"He observed that at its core, the APNU+AFC administration subscribed to those constitutional provisions, which provide for “decentralisation of authority, as well as devolution of power”. That is the programme that the administration has sought to pursue from the beginning of its assumption to office."

If Bulkan really believes in this statement he made, then he never heard of a guy named Harmon.  While I do give credit to them for holding Local Government Elections, I do not believe there has been any “decentralisation of authority, as well as devolution of power”.

In fact, the exact opposite has happened.  The locally elected citizens are powerless, the central government comprising of primarily ex-GDF personnel are moving the country towards a military dictatorship.  And Bulkan knows that!!!!

Your inherent racism makes you stupid.  Cannot think beyond supporting the "coolie people party, whose only goal is to mobilize its East Indian support base". 

If they tell you jumping is good, you jump.  When you jump they then tell that you should have been kneeling instead, you will do so without even asking why.

What is the number one complaint from the rural communities? 

That too much decision making occurs in G/T and therefore is unresponsive to the needs of these areas.  Corriverton is almost 200 miles away from G/T. Why should basic resource allocation decisions be made by people who know nothing and don't care the slightest about this town?

Why is democracy a failure in Guyana?  Because the average person sees it as irrelevant to their lives, and also lack a chain of command to forward their concerns.

What is the solution?  Stronger local gov't which brings micro level decision making closer to the individual.  It also allows more people to get experience in governance issues, and therefore means that we will be less reliant on old party faithfuls, who answer only to the party leadership.

What is the best way to get central gov't to respond to the local communities?  By electing people, who answer to the community, and NOT to the political establishment.

Those communities, which have independent representatives (Kwakawani, and G/T to a lesser extent), will get better representation than those who voted for Jagdeo's slaves. Why?  Because if these independent reps don't perform that they will be voted out next time. No party hierarchy to protect them.

But you are too dumb to understand this, because this isn't what you are instructed to parrot by FreeDUMB House.

 

FM
Demerara_Guy posted:

Ronald Bulkan is simply blowing hot air and unaware of basic issues.

The independent reps, who are located exclusively in PNC strongholds, in fact even controlling one of them, will make him aware. Kwakwani, is controlled by these folks.

Stop being a Guyanese with these backwards "wha we gun do?" mentality.  If Guyanese want effective leadership, their best opportunity is at the local gov't level, because it is at that level (in the PNC strongholds) where they can vote in, and vote out people.

PPP supporters are slaves, who stupidly vote for Jagdeo slaves.  These slaves will ignore them, and will only respond to Jagdeo.  That is what they voted for.

FM
Demerara_Guy posted:
caribny posted:

PPP supporters are slaves, who stupidly vote for Jagdeo slaves.  

PNC/AFC supporters are .... ????

Intelligent and have good morals.

cain
Last edited by cain
Demerara_Guy posted:
caribny posted:

PPP supporters are slaves, who stupidly vote for Jagdeo slaves.  

PNC/AFC supporters are .... ????

Screaming and cussing down Granger and others for taking away their stalls, and their minibus parking.

FM
skeldon_man posted:
Demerara_Guy posted:
caribny posted:

PPP supporters are slaves, who stupidly vote for Jagdeo slaves.  

PNC/AFC supporters are .... ????

TAKERS..not MAKERS.

Yes, that is why the PPP lost in 2015, was driven out of G/T, Linden, Bartica, Kwakwani, and New Amsterdam in 2016.  In fact even the Amerindians in Lethem are tired of you lot.

FM

You must come to the realization that Forbes Burnman encouraged and supported the lazy negroes to be MAKERS. They bluntly refused thinking that PNC would rule Guyana forever. They burnt the boards from their govt. subsidized houses to cook(Scottsburg). They did not want to make anything. They were convinced then and now that they should only be TAKERS. They knew they did not have to make anything for they are ENTITLED everything for free during that period. If they did not get their way, they commit acts of violence and robbery against the makers(coolies). Don't worry why the PPP lost in the negro areas. It's all racism which you vehemently deny. Black people are not racists; they are supporters of the PNC. Coolies are racists because they support the PPP. Clear your head here Mr. Coolie Hater. There are a few coolie haters here including some coolies.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×