- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I watching the live stream,video high quality,
the area look clean,damn i did not visit that
place almost 2 decades.
I had occasion to be at Brickdam last year and the state of the Public Buildings was disgraceful. Garbage and homeless people everywhere.
I had occasion to be at Brickdam last year and the state of the Public Buildings was disgraceful. Garbage and homeless people everywhere.
I know that area always had homeless people,it used
to be clean well up to 96,video can be deceieving.
Good to see that our Afro people feel close to Granger and are falling over themselves to help clean up.
Don't know why they did not have such sentiments towards the Head of the Awards List, our Independence Fighter and Freedom Fighter, Bilal Ato, and cleaned up since he is our Mayor.
Is this some kind of racism?
They need to also move all those illegal vendors who set up stalls right in front of the doors of the Regent Street stores. When the past govt wanted to move the vendors, Green would tell them not to move. What a crook?
Guyana lacks professionalism in video broadcasting a national event. Even minor things seems difficult.
The equipment seems to be of good quality, but its location and movement was poor.
The audio was very poor and not acceptable, for a national event honouring a new government.
While trouble shooting the audio grounding hum during the show, channels could be heard being switched degrading the audio quality. It was tinny during the entire ceremony and the audio during President Granger's speech could have been much better.
But one compliment, during the loud hum, they allowed the audio to continue uninterrupted.
Its better to have bad audio or none at all.
But this problem could have been found with proper testing prior to this national event. The result sees to indicate this might not have been done.
The entire event lacks proper planning.
The parliament building is not a new place for video broadest, but it seems to be a difficult experience every time.
It took two hours to identify and resolve the loud grounding hum. There was no microphone outside to hear the soldier's command. A single camera microphone could have done this.
The outside camera on the balcony should envision people standing in front of it and should have been originally position close to the railing, or higher.
Sometimes using conduit pipes to elevate a tripod another four feet, to shoot above heads in a large gathering, while standing on a ladder.
This is an unnerving problem in Guyana, people don't seem to recognize a camera and not only walk in front of it, but they also stand right in front.
In most other countries, people will bend down while walking in front of camera to avoid detection, but not in Guyana, they don't seem to care.
The entire video shoots lack proper planning and coordination.
If video broadcast in Guyana is to get even close to becoming professional, these people needs a lot of training.
The video of Cheddi jagan's funeral was so poor, its seems that a six year old with a home quality camera recorded it.