Attorney General, Anil Nandlall on Tuesday told the High Court that nothing was wrong with one arm of the State taking another arm to court, as he sought to justify why the judiciary could enquire into decisions made by Parliament.
At issue is whether the National Assembly violated the principle of proportionality in deciding on the composition of the Committee of Selection. The one-seat opposition majority controlled House has decided that the committee should be made up of four from the governing Peoples Progressive Party Civic (PPPC), four from A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and one from the Alliance For Change (AFC).
The government had preferred a 10-seat Committee with five from the PPPC, four from APNU and one from AFC to reflect what it says is the 32-seat PPPC, 26-seat APNU and seven-seat AFC in the House. The High Court, according to government, should also declare that all Standing Committees and Special Select Committees be constituted in proportion to the number of seats each political party was allocated based on the results of the November 28 general election.
Excerpts from Demwaves