Govt unclear about vision for Guyana – Hinds

why on earth is David Hinds giving interviews to Guyana Times?

smfh

Why on earth shouldn't he?  Maybe the Chronicle doesn't allow him to express his views.

I don't see anything that he said which is inaccurate.  In fact his behavior shows up the fact that PPP supporters dare not be so bold about their party.

And also that Guyana Times will never allow those who are to be allowed to make their views known.

Don't always agree with hinds .. but I'd agree in his observations at this point 

caribny posted:

Why on earth shouldn't he?  Maybe the Chronicle doesn't allow him to express his views.

I don't see anything that he said which is inaccurate.  In fact his behavior shows up the fact that PPP supporters dare not be so bold about their party.

And also that Guyana Times will never allow those who are to be allowed to make their views known.

i can only shake my head at u (and David) in y'all pitch perfect dance of the political naifs

it boggles the mind that i have to give a tutorial on why rat's race paper is no ordinary opposition media . . . a nefarious enterprise that should be boycotted and refused legitimacy beyond pool coverage

reminds me of Winnie Mandela seeking a sympathetic ear from VS Naipaul and his wife at the height of her travails with South African Justice, and then recoiling at the result and the using

alyuh ego will be alyuh downfall

redux posted:

 

i can only shake my head at u (and David) in y'all pitch perfect dance of the political naifs

it boggles the mind that i have to give a tutorial on why rat's race paper is no ordinary opposition media . . . a nefarious enterprise that should be boycotted and refused legitimacy beyond pool coverage

reminds me of Winnie Mandela seeking a sympathetic ear from VS Naipaul and his wife at the height of her travails with South African Justice, and then recoiling at the result and the using

alyuh ego will be alyuh downfall

So do you think that the PPP shouldn't interact with KN, SN, or the Chronicle, all of which they consider to be hostile media?   They certainly isolated and tried to destroy KN and SN, and we all condemned it.

So if David Hinds says the SAMETHING in the Guyana Times, as he has already said in KN, and SN.  And wanted to say in the Chronicle, but Nagamoootoo barred him from doing so (free press?), then he has every right to.

caribny posted:

redux posted:

 

i can only shake my head at u (and David) in y'all pitch perfect dance of the political naifs

it boggles the mind that i have to give a tutorial on why rat's race paper is no ordinary opposition media . . . a nefarious enterprise that should be boycotted and refused legitimacy beyond pool coverage

reminds me of Winnie Mandela seeking a sympathetic ear from VS Naipaul and his wife at the height of her travails with South African Justice, and then recoiling at the result and the using

alyuh ego will be alyuh downfall

So do you think that the PPP shouldn't interact with KN, SN, or the Chronicle, all of which they consider to be hostile media?   They certainly isolated and tried to destroy KN and SN, and we all condemned it.

So if David Hinds says the SAMETHING in the Guyana Times, as he has already said in KN, and SN.  And wanted to say in the Chronicle, but Nagamoootoo barred him from doing so (free press?), then he has every right to.

pay careful attention to what i am actually saying

NO EXCLUSIVES!!!! . . . their currency is distortion and race propaganda

why serve up wicked opportunity to these vipers on a platter?

when they call, u decline . . . they are free to attend press conferences along with other outlets or function as member of a pool

what's so freakin hard to understand?

redux posted:

 

NO EXCLUSIVES!!!! . . . their currency is distortion and race propaganda

why serve up wicked opportunity to these vipers on a platter?

 

David Hinds told them nothing that he didn't tell SN, or KN.

Shows that he is the bigger man.

In fact the coalition should take note of the fact that they don't own their base.  Complacent disregard might have deadly consequences come 2020.

So David has a right to speak to whoever he wishes, provided that they don't distort what he said.

caribny posted:

redux posted:

NO EXCLUSIVES!!!! . . . their currency is distortion and race propaganda

why serve up wicked opportunity to these vipers on a platter?

David Hinds told them nothing that he didn't tell SN, or KN.

Shows that he is the bigger man.

In fact the coalition should take note of the fact that they don't own their base.  Complacent disregard might have deadly consequences come 2020.

So David has a right to speak to whoever he wishes, provided that they don't distort what he said.

caribny, your 1st sentence (assertion) is a non sequitur. . . or, perhaps you simply fail to understand what "wicked opportunity" means

and sir, no one is questioning David Hinds' right to speak to whomever he wishes . . . what the hell are u pulling out of your arse here?

straw men all over the place

smfh

redux posted:

 

and sir, no one is questioning David Hinds' right to speak to whomever he wishes . . .

So what is your problem?  He had a right to speak to GT, and decided to do so. 

Quite likely because he understand that Guyanese are polarized, so wants to broaden the reach of his message.

His comments were not distorted, so I see nothing wrong with this.

If his comments are used by GT to attack the coalition, well the coalition shouldn't have childishly banished him from the Chronicle.

In fact the coalition on so many occasions have played into the PPPs attempt to discredit them. Starting with increasing ministers' salaries, when they simultaneously claimed that the country was broke.  Many other actions since then give the PPP opportunities, like Joe Harmon's out of order behavior.

So chatting with GT is not the problem.

caribny posted:

redux posted:

 

and sir, no one is questioning David Hinds' right to speak to whomever he wishes . . .

So what is your problem?  He had a right to speak to GT, and decided to do so. 

Quite likely because he understand that Guyanese are polarized, so wants to broaden the reach of his message.

His comments were not distorted, so I see nothing wrong with this.

If his comments are used by GT to attack the coalition, well the coalition shouldn't have childishly banished him from the Chronicle.

In fact the coalition on so many occasions have played into the PPPs attempt to discredit them. Starting with increasing ministers' salaries, when they simultaneously claimed that the country was broke.  Many other actions since then give the PPP opportunities, like Joe Harmon's out of order behavior.

So chatting with GT is not the problem.

your flailing, disjointed, inapposite stream of consciousness rambling is amusing

perhaps later, in your quiet time, when there is no need to save face, u will re-read my posts and learn something

redux posted:

 

your stream of consciousness rambling is amusing

perhaps later, in your quiet time, when there is no need to save face, u will re-read my posts and learn something

I made comments about my prior interactions with you, which you found insulting.

The coalition has made many mistakes, which have played into the hands of the PPP. David Hinds makes mention of many of these.

The GT will make hay of these comments no doubt. But then the Chronicle shouldn't have prevented Hinds from making comments in a paper which is supported by Guyanese taxpayers.

You ought to be disturbed by the fact that the coalition is resorting to PPP type behavior in how it treats the Chronicle, that they now even attempt to silence one of their most ardent supporters!

caribny posted:

I made comments about my prior interactions with you, which you found insulting.

oh yes, your LIES . . . about me calling you a "traitor"

you have no bloody shame!

caribny posted:

redux posted:

and sir, no one is questioning David Hinds' right to speak to whomever he wishes . . .

So what is your problem?  He had a right to speak to GT, and decided to do so. 

 

Just more signs of Redux' confusion.

ksazma posted:

 Just more signs of Redux' confusion.

banna, i understand u tekkin blows and sucking wind

but looking for 'support' with one liners and smiley faces on all the wrong threads only brings out the antiman in u for all to see

check yourself